Williams Track & Field Comes Up Short Against MIT

By Andy MorgoshWilliams Sports Info
Print Story | Email Story
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The Ephs came up short on Saturday against Division III rival MIT, finishing second in a three-team meet hosted by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Both the Ephs (136.5 points), and Coast Guard (47) finished behind MIT's impressive team score of 192.5 points.

While the scoring discrepancy seems significant, it is important to note that tri-meets have that effect on scoring; subtle differences in performances often manifest large gaps in team score. While Saturday's meet remains disappointing in that it was the first meet the team truly tried to win, the Ephs remain confident in themselves with their eyes still affixed on repeating as New England Division III Champions.

The Ephs got a boost going into the weekend on Friday when junior Isaac Nicholson finished first of 11 competitors at the Tufts Pentathlon. Nicholson scored big in the 60-meter hurdles (8.97 sec, 752 points), the high jump (1.89m, 705 points), and the 1000m race (2:46.29, 805 points). His combined score of 3,409 points easily topped second-place Matthew Blazon of the University of Massachusetts at Lowell.

Freshman Jabs Blyden competed in an unlikely combination of events, the 55m hurdles and the 800. Even more impressively, he finished second in the 55 (8.05 seconds) and won the 800 (1:58.89). To score in both disciplines demonstrates a remarkable amount of talent and event range. Blyden is perhaps the first runner in Williams history to earn D-III qualifiers for the 55m hurdles and the 800 on the same day. Junior Taylor Fitzgerald was also impressive, winning the 400m for the first time this year in 50.86 seconds, a solid time for the indoor track. The effort earned "Fitz" an ECAC qualifier. He also finished second in the 200m dash, thereby scoring an important 12 points on the day. Don Polite Jr., freshman, scored for the first time in his Williams career, running the 55m dash in 6.97 seconds.

In longer distances, senior Edgar Kosgey and freshman Tommy Gaidus finished first and third, respectively, in the 1000m. Although not exceptionally fast, Kosgey's 2:33.31 constituted a more than one-second victory over the second place runner Bill Phipps of M.I.T. Sophomore Josephat Koima and senior Cullen Roberts were second and third in the 1 mile. The Ephs' best event of the day was undoubtedly the 3000, where the team finished first, second, third, fifth, and sixth, scoring 19 of their 136.5 points in that one event. Senior Connor Kamm led the way in 8:37.90 (an ECAC qualifier), followed by sophomore Anthony Raduazo and freshman Brandon Abasolo.  Finally, senior Corey Watts came up victorious in the 5000m, with his 15:08 time earning an ECAC qualifier and beating second place by almost seven seconds.

Rusty Cowher's name is becoming synonymous with strong Eph performances in the throwing events; Saturday was no exception. Cowher finished second in the weight throw and fifth in the shot put, with the former deserving of an ECAC qualifier. Johnny Ray Hinojosa grabbed a pair of points in an event typically dominated by M.I.T., the pole vault.

Sophomore Tomas Kearney was up to his scoring ways once again with a second place in both the long and triple jump. Both times he was bested solely by M.I.T. athlete Stephen Morton. He completed the jumping trifecta by winning the high jump (thank goodness Morton was not competing), totalling an impressive 17 points for the Ephs. Junior Steve Rubin nabbed a pair of fifth-place finishes in the same events as Kearney, scoring four points for the team.

Fletcher Brooks offered these comments about the team's second-place finish:

"I was proud of both the men and women. The men did better than we expected given that we did not try to stretch some of our athletes as much as they are capable of. We gave MIT a good fight and in two weeks expect to fight even stronger and battle them even harder."

He concluded an e-mail sent to the team with this brief by telling line: "Two weeks: New England Division III Championships."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Planning Board Narrowing in on Subdivision Bylaw Changes

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Planning Board late last month discussed specific features of what it plans to pass as a new subdivision control bylaw this year.
 
The board long has discussed the complex set of regulations as being out of date and cumbersome to both potential developers and the board itself, which has needed to hear requests for waivers of outdated rules for the handful of residential subdivisions that have been proposed in town in recent years.
 
This spring, the town engaged consultants from Northampton's Dodson and Flinker Landscape Architecture and Planning to go through the existing bylaw, compare it to more contemporary regulations in other communities and help craft a revised bylaw.
 
Unlike the zoning bylaw, where amendments require approval of town meeting, the subdivision control bylaw is a creation of the Planning Board, which can make changes on its own after a public hearing process it hopes to complete this year.
 
At a special Planning Board meeting on May 26, Dillon Sussman of Dodson and Flinker and his colleagues walked the board through a dozen different decision points that the board must resolve — either by leaving the bylaw as is or making a change — and offered suggestions based on best practices.
 
All of the issues are technical and ranged from the fundamental, like how the bylaw will define types of subdivisions, to the highly specific, like what turning radii will be required in new streets that are constructed to serve planned developments.
 
One example of a topic that came up in the recent approval of a four-home subdivision off Summer Street is stormwater management.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories