Independent Investor: Set It and Forget It

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
Remember Ron Popeil and his set-it-and-forget-it Rotisserie Oven? Now you can do the same with your retirement savings. 
 
Life-cycle funds, sometimes called target–date or age-based funds, offer investors a simple path through the complexity of investing. All you need do is make two decisions.

The first is easy: pick your retirement date. Most life-cycle funds are targeted and identified by a specific retirement year, like the 2050 fund or 2020 fund. Next, pick your risk-tolerance level. Are you a conservative, moderate or aggressive investor?  That's it; the fund takes care of the rest.

Life-cycle funds got started after studies revealed that many investors do a poor job diversifying and rebalancing their portfolios as they approach retirement. So Wall Street stepped in with a maintenance-free alternative to the do-it-yourself approach.

Normally, these funds are structured with an aggressive mix of bonds and stocks in the early years. The fund mangers determine how much to invest in cash, bonds, stocks and where (domestic versus international) based on your risk-tolerance level. As the fund and you grow older the investment mix grows progressively more conservative until your retirement date.

Let's take my friend Scott, for example. He is 40 years old, with a moderate risk tolerance (which means he is willing to take some risks to see his retirement fund grow but he's not going to bet the farm on it) and plans to retire in 2033.

He selects a fund close to his retirement target. We'll call it "Fund 2035" offered in three categories: aggressive, moderate and conservative. The fund's present investment allocation for a moderate investor is 60 percent stocks, 30 percent bonds and 10 percent cash.

The portfolio is also designed to rebalance and reallocate continuously all the time, as Scott grows older. Fast forward 10 years, the portfolio allocation has changed.  It is now 55 percent stocks, 35 percent bonds and 10 percent cash. By the year 2035, the allocation may be invested mostly in bonds and cash with just a small proportion in equity. Of course, the old trade-off between risk and return still applies. The more conservative (less risk) the fund incurs the less return one can expect.


There's more. Let's say stocks perform really well next year. By the end of 2008 they have grown from 60 percent to 70 percent of the portfolio while bonds and cash have slipped lower. The fund manger will automatically rebalance, selling stocks and buying bonds until the portfolio is back to its proper allocation. If you decide at some point that you want to adjust your risk-level higher or lower you can always do that by simply switching to another fund.

Assets under management have almost tripled over the past few years. All the big boys like Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard, etc. offer these age-based funds so it is a good idea to shop around since there may be a big difference in the fees one fund charges over another.

A few caveats are in order as well. This is one investment where you should "put all your eggs in one basket" since you are hiring a life-cycle fund to diversify your money so you don’t have to do it.

One draw back to purchasing a life-cycle fund from a family of funds is that the manager will limit his selection of funds to only his company's offerings, which may not be the optimal choice.

Since the fund is set on autopilot; as you grow older, more of your money will be invested in bonds. That poses its own risks. What if, for example, the world enters a ten-year bear market in bonds as you turn 55 or inflation returns to double digits as it did back in the late 70s?

So maybe you do have to pay some attention to long-term economic trends, but my take is that life-cycle funds are both sensible and simple and offer peace of mind to the retail investor bewildered by the number of investment options today.

Bill Schmick is a licensed investment adviser representative and portfolio strategist with Berkshire-based Dion Money Management, managing more than $800 million for middle class Americans from coast to coast. Direct your inquires to Bill at 1-877-850-7942, Ext. 146 (toll free) or e-mail him at wschmick@dionmm.com. You can also visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill's insight.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Town Meeting to Vote Budget, Bylaws & Vehicle Purchases

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Tuesday's annual town meeting includes a $14 million operating budget, new short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units and sign bylaws, and free cash article appropriations.

Voters will gather at Lanesborough Elementary School on June 9 at 6 p.m. to decide on 20 warrant articles.

The fiscal 2027 budget is up a little over 10 percent. Some of the main increases are the Mount Greylock Regional School District and McCann Technical School: the McCann assessment is up more than 30 percent based on factors including enrollment and the school renovation project, and Mount Greylock's is up 11 percent.

Article 11 is for the town to vote to approve from free cash the sum of $16,298.48 for the McCann Technical School roof and window replacement project so as not to impact the budget. Article 3 is  appropriate $7,586,284 for Mount Greylock Regional School assessment.

Another notable increase was in life and health insurance, showing an increase of about 26 percent.

Ambulance Director Jen Weber is planning 24-hour coverage, which means more staff and a hike in her budget. One of the articles asks the town to appropriate $234,100 to operate the Ambulance Enterprise Fund for salaries and expenses.

Many town departments are looking for new vehicles. The Fire Department is looking to replace its outdated 1996 fire engine. There are two articles related to the truck at a total of $813,366. Article 12 would transfer $225,000 from free cash into the Fire Truck Stabilization Fund; Article 13 would transfer $605,000 from the fund and authorize the borrowing of $208,366.08.

The total includes a $100,000 contingency cost to cover any additional costs if a 2026 model-year chassis cannot be secured before new emissions standards go into effect in 2027.

The board at its last meeting moved the $225,000 transfer to come before the borrowing article, changing the stabilization number. If the $225,000 is not voted on, then they will amend the next article's number on the floor, subtracting the $225,000. This shows the borrowing number significantly lower.

Article 17 asks for the transfer of $80,000 from free cash to replace a police cruiser.

Police Chief Rob Derksen's aim is to replace one vehicle every other year, meaning the oldest vehicle gets replaced about every 10 years. 

He stressed that if delayed this year, the town may have to double up in a future year to get back on schedule, and that paying later usually costs more. The article will ask for $80,000 from free cash, the vehicles used to be funded by the BHRD.

Lastly, the Highway Department is looking to replace a 2014 International dump truck that will be a total of $330,000 and will take two to three years to receive.

Money will be used from last year's approval of $250,000 from free cash for the replacement of a 2012 highway front-end loader that was underspent $49,261. Town meeting is being asked to approve  a transfer of $53,274.85 from free cash and the use of $227,464 from funds from the Sale of Town Real Estate to fund the balance.

Other free cash proposals include $1,200 to purchase software to support tracking and ongoing maintenance schedules of town-owned vehicles; $42,000 for the replacement of the Highway Department's storage shed roof, $200,000 to reduce the tax levy.

View Full Story

More Stories