| TOP STORIES AROUND THE COUNTY |
Solicitor's Opinion Sought on Package Store PermitBy Tammy Daniels iBerkshires Staff 09:27AM / Tuesday, February 09, 2010
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — A disagreement over whether a liquor license change constituted a change in use was referred to the city solicitor's office on Monday.
Stephen Pagnotta, attorney for Joseph Lora, argued that his client's application to switch from sales of beer and wine to an all-alcoholic license for River Street Package Store should not trigger the need for a special permit under the city's ordinances.
"There are no proposed changes to the outside of building ... no substantial changes to practice or to traffic are anticipated," he told the board.
That prompted to Planner Paul Hopkins to query if anything was going to be done to the building, which still sports a temporary plywood cover over a hole caused by an errant police cruiser nearly two years ago.
"I cannot imagine approving this," he said. Pagnotta responded that the change in license wouldn't require a change in the building — not that the building may not change. The delay in fixing the damaged wall was caused by an insurance dispute, he added.
Planners, however, expressed concern that the hole remained along with numerous other code violations despite conditions set on the owners 2 1/2 years ago.
Administrative Officer Jay Green said Lora had moved forward with some of the conditions on the building but others remained.
A garage had been taken down and paint applied, said Building Inspector William Meranti, but there was rotted wood, missing screens and windows, main windows that were unsupported, excess signage and missing siding along with the damage by the cruiser.
"The Board of Health has had issues with the rest of the building," he said. "It's the owner's responsibility to deal with it.
"The code is the code and those issues need to be taken care of."
Pagnotta said Lora was willing to work with the city on what needed to be done but the permit should not get hung up on aesthetic issues since it did not relate to the liquor license.
"I'd go one step further," said Chairman Michael Leary. "My concern is this board issuing a permit to a building that's not even up to code."
But, said Pagnotta, "there's nothing in that bylaw that provides that the change of a liquor license is a change in use."
Leary countered that he would recommend the board refer it to the city solicitor, "which is the opinion that I would be listening to."
The hearing was continued until March.
In other business:
â–º The board approved sign changes and related updating of the Getty gas station at 148 Eagle St. into a BP station. The application was filed some months ago by Core States Group, an architectural firm, but has been continued since October. The application was approved with the condition that the existing fence be updated or removed and the area landscaped and the project be completed by Sept. 1.
â–º Approved Monk Transport's move to 578 Curran Highway, the site of an old foundry behind Mr. Tire. The company collects and transports rubber (tires) and plastic for recycling and had previously operated for four years at the Cariddi Sales building. The application was approved on condition that the city receive a letter from the state Department of Environmental Protection, that all materials be stored within trailers and that the number of trailers be limited to four.
â–º Approved the new signage and the request by the Elf Parlor on Ashland Street to add beer and wine to its menu, dependent on Licensing Commission approval. The board voted 8-1 with Wayne Wilkinson voting against because of the proximity of the college.
â–º Approved a request from Mary Giannaris to add beer and wine to the menu of Christo's Famous Pizza on Holden Street, dependent upon approval by the Licensing Commission.
â–º Reviewed a report from the Traffic Commission recommending the no parking along Canal Street with the exception of a 15-minute limit for off-loading supplies at the Crystal Hard Hat. The board had referred the matter to the Traffic Commission over concerns that the bar's relocation to the former Quinn's Paint & Wallpaper building would cause congestion. The board voted to recommend the City Council adopt the Traffic Commission plan.
â–º The hearing on the proposed Walmart Super Center was continued to next month at the request of the company's representatives. Detailed plans the board had asked for at the last meeting were ready in time for Monday's meeting. |
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary. Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com |
I find it interesting that Monk Transport didn't need to go before the Planning Board when it was located in Councilor Cariddi's building.
Editor: Are you sure of that? | | from: Greased Wheels | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
does the city just issue beer and wine permits to anyone that asks?
Editor: No. They have to go before the Licensing Commission and also have to be approved by the state Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission. | | from: elf man | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Nice to know that of all of the info in this story, you pick out an obscure mention of Monk's trucking, which has been in Carridi's building for seven years, but you seem fine with the fact that a liquor store can continue to stay open despite not being up to safety code. There should be a statute that says any business that fails to meet code should be shuttered until it does. Lora owns some of the worst properties in this city and never puts a dime into them. And by the way, how the heck do you even know the board didn't have Monk come before it seven years ago? Other businesses in Carridi's building have come before them. | | from: blinders on | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I wish the city would make the Lora's clean up both the River St property and the former Dairy Queen building that they operate. Both buildings are disgusting and just b/c you own something doesn't mean you shouldn't take care of it. I mean come a little paint,flowers, fix the whole that was created 2 yrs ago on River St. Okay so it was an insurance dispute holding up so you take $ out of your own pocket and fix it and when it's resolved reimburse yourself. Take pride in your business and pride in our city and clean up your buildings! | | from: CONCERNED | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| the elf parlor was opened as a internet coffee house, thats all we need is another bar in town | | from: elf man | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Getting a beer and wine license hardly makes the Elf Parlor a bar. Come on, folks, let's be real -- almost any place that serves adults these days needs to at least be able to serve a glass of wine with a meal. If they can't, the customers go somewhere else ... and you have to close up shop. Let them compete. | | from: relax | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| And ditto re: Mr. Lora cleaning up the River Street Package Store building. It's a disgrace. Why has this been allowed? | | from: relax | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Go Elf Parlor! | | from: Bailey's and Coffee | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| The Elf Parlor is not a bar. Just because it will serve beer and wine doesn't make it a bar. Papa Gino's sells beer and wine. Red Sauce sells it. Boston Seafood has a full liquor permit. Are any of those places bars? No, they're restaurants. They sell food. The Hot Dog Ranch sells food, but anyone who goes in there knows it's much more like a bar than a restaurant. Elf Parlor has always been a nice place to go, clean, well run, friendly owners. | | from: not a bar | on: 02-09-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| all great comments, which i agree with...why did the elf parlor not apply for a beer and wine liscense when it first opened?... | | from: elf man | on: 02-10-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| tell you what ,i can,t believe the city lets this guys sell anything out of this dump on river st . you tore down better homes than this building .rip it down and make that intersection better .what dump ! only thing i would give this guy is a permint to rip it down .if the city lets this go on looking the way it is than they should never look at any more buildings in this city .come on councilers lets move on this,it long over due. he can,t even clean the windows for god sake never mine fix the hole in the side or the windows up stairs .clean it up or rip it down . | | from: dan | on: 02-11-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
I find it interesting that Monk Transport didn't need to go before the Planning Board when it was located in Councilor Cariddi's building.
Editor: Are you sure of that?
from: Greased Wheels
I am 100 percent sure Monk Transport did NOT go to the Planning Board in 2002 when they went into the Cariddi Mill. | | from: My City | on: 02-13-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
When is the opinion expected?
Editor: Presumably by the next meeting, March 8. | | from: interested | on: 02-17-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
|
Advertise on iBerkshires.com

|