Mount Greylock Seeks to Avoid Costly Building Upgrades

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

iBerkshires file
Replacement of the regional school's 40-year-old heating system may have to be cut back to avoid invoking a costly state law.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — A drop in the value of Mount Greylock Regional High School could mean cutting back on the number of new boilers for the revamped heating system.

School Committee member Robert Ericson, who's taken on the task of project manager for the replacement of the boiler system and reconstruction of two locker rooms, said Tuesday night that the total $2.4 million project appears to exceed to 30 percent of the building's value.

That could invoke a state law requiring the district to bring the entire 50-year-old building up to current code at a cost of millions more.

Ericson said the town's building inspector assessed the value at $7.7 million, nearly $1 million below the last valuation done for a feasibility study in 2006. That puts the project about $100,000 over the 30 percent mark.

"I went and spoke to the assessor about it ... and the philosophical answer was school buildings have no real value and don't sell well," he said. "His opinion was the school building is worth no more than the cost of tearing it down and getting rid of it."

Any new construction or remodeling in Massachusetts must be up to current code, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, according to 521 CMR 3.3.

"When the work performed on a building is divided into separate phases or projects or is under separate building permits, the total cost of such work in any 36-month period shall be added together in applying 521 CMR 3.3, Existing Buildings."


That would require installing a sprinkler system that would require a 2.5 million gallon water tank, among other costly projects in the 183,000 square-foot building.

Committee members questioned whether the five boilers for the heating system could be combined with the $1.3 million project to fix the collapsing ceilings in two locker rooms.


"It seems like the boilers are movable assets while the ceilings are structural repairs," said committee member Carrie Green. "We're not sinking money into the building the same way."

Committee member Jack Hickey said the use of "fair cash value" takes into account the replacement value, which for Mount Greylock would mean $50 million "give or take a million." Less a 40 percent depreciation, the value should be far more than $7.7 million.

"I really think we ought to question the number that the assesor has done and I think we also need to question the logic that's being put forth," he said, noting the funds were being used to keep the building functioning and useful for years to come.

An independent appraisal was authorized earlier by the board but has not yet taken place. Ericson said the assessors' view was that it may not be credible. Committee member Ronald Tinkham disputed that, saying the district had both a local option to request abatement and the mechanism at the state level to call in a mediator.


Committee member Robert Ericson speaks with SBA Executive Director Katherine Craven last year about the collapsed ceilings.
Since applying for building permits at this point would kick in the 30 percent rule, bumping the project far above what the school district can afford, Ericson said it would behoove the the board to adjust the contracts below the limit to get the work going in time for the locker rooms to be used in the fall.

"Right now, I'm struggling to find the scope that can be taken out of these projects," said Ericson, adding the easiest way would be to eliminate the fifth boiler, leaving the school with four. Two boilers have been installed and are operating.

The board referred the matter to the school district's counsel and will move forward with the independent appraisal. Chairman David Archibald and other committee members will meet with the town's assessors.

The school district will take out $1.2 million bond toward the work. The School Building Authority is expected to cover more than half the cost.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories