Mixed Reactions From Local Voters on Presidential Debate

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

Early arrivals and members of the press get settled in to watch the first presidential debate on Wednesday.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Despite the overall liberal orientation of the crowd, opinions were fairly diverse among debate watchers at Dottie's Coffee Lounge on Wednesday night over who "won" the night's verbal jousting match.

The debate is one of three presidential debates which the North Street eatery and downtown social hub will show projected on the big screen.

"Dottie's is a community that I feel like I belong to," said regular customer Eammon Barry on his reasoning for coming out to the cafe for this event. "So watching the debate here feels like I'm being responsible to that community, and my friends."

From the start, it was clear that the approximately 35 attendees, ranging from too-young-to-vote to middle-aged, contained no die-hard Mitt Romney supporters, though from the undertones of dissatisfaction with President Obama it was clear that this crowd could not be considered the core base of the Democratic campaign either.

Through the course of the 90-minute debate, it was Obama's quips and off-hand jibes that elicited more noise of approval from the room than any particular policy point or rebuttal. Meanwhile, Romney's remarks about his opponent drew less reaction than his references to economic mathematics, which tended to provoke a gradually louder laughter that began to turn more to occasional expletives in the final half hour.

After it was over, reactions were mixed on who had performed better. 

"I don't think there was any question about who won," said Justin Allen. "I think the president made Romney look dumb."

"Romney won. Obama let him slide on a lot," said active Democratic activist Timothy Kushi. "One is citing this study, one is citing that study, and the public isn't going to read those studies. It just looked like they were arguing two different sets of facts."

"It's just so frustrating," continued Kushi, "because there's so much that they discussed, and Obama let him get away with so much. I think Romney was clearly the winner."

"Mitt won, based on sheer time possession," said another man, who like many expressed displeasure with the loose moderation style of Jim Lehrer, executive editor of the PBS NewsHour.

Many felt that the former governor brought more passion and emotion to his side of the debate, though not all found it believable.

"The emotion almost seemed like part of him trying to hard," said Margaret, an Oregon resident who was just in the area for a few weeks.

Who lost the debate?
Obama
Romney
Lehrer
The American people
Big Bird
Who cares? Bobby V is gone!
In addition to members of the conventional press, local spoken word artist Jay Davis covered the event from a poetical approach, crafting a comedic three-page opus from his observations that lampooned some of the perceived frivolities of both candidates' performances, and asked such questions as whether Jim Lehrer equals Big Bird, and how the two candidates would come out on "Whose Line Is It, Anyway?"

Davis also conducted an informal exit poll of about half the crowd after the debate, resulting in a tally of seven who felt Obama won, four who said Romney won, two undecided and one who felt it was a draw.

"I'd call it a draw," said Davis. "I'd put these three [two undecided and one draw answer] under Romney, because it was such an Obama-heavy crowd to begin with."

On the overall event, Dottie's proprietor Jessica Lamb was pleased, and looks forward to hosting the next two on Oct. 16 and 22.

"I was really pleased with how it all came together," said Lamb. "I thought it was the perfect amount of people." 

"I thought there was a little less enthusiasm than I had anticipated," she told iBerkshires, conceding that the attendance was not particularly balanced by political persuasion. Both staff and patrons agreed: Subsequent debates could use more Republicans.

Tags: debate,   obama,   president,   Romney,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board of Health Approves Green Burial Verbiage

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — The Board of Health approved wording for the green burial guidelines during its meeting on Wednesday. 
 
The guideline stipulates that "Ebola or any other diseases that the CDC or Massachusetts Department of Public Health deem unsuitable for green burials can not be approved by the town Board of Health." 
 
The board has been navigating how to include communicable diseases in its guidelines to prevent them from spreading.  
 
Town Health Agent Agnes Witkowski has been working to clarify the state's guidelines regarding infectious diseases and green burials. 
 
She attended a presentation on green burials and consulted with people from various organizations, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where it was determined that the state is behind in developing guidelines for green burials.
 
Currently, the only disease that would prevent someone from being able to have a green burial is ebola, board member Amanda Staples-Opperman said. Bugs would take care of anything else. 
 
The town running into situations surrounding an unknown disease would be a very rare occurrence, board members said. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories