Letters: Lowry Property Should Be Preserved

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I'm sorry to ask for space in the media again so soon, but I feel I must  respond to Charleen Blood's letter. It was full of misinformation.

I am 88 years old and blessed with a good memory. The land which we purchased on Stratton Road in the late 1940s was not farmland. We bought the land from Stuart and Gertrude Graham. He was a town assessor, and she was a beloved music teacher in the Williamstown Public Schools. As I recall, it was previously owned by at least one other person who intended to build a home. Just below us, Charlie and Alice Foist built a home on a strip of land given to them by his employer, Floyd Lowry. Below us on either side of the street, were older houses belonging to the Bates, Halfacre, Cummings, Jacks, and Rudman families. All of them still stand.

Just across the street lived Tom Fowler, a farmer who sold vegetables at a stand on his property. He lived in a small one-room house and loved the land, a sunny day, a blue sky, or a blue bird. He married late in life, and he and his wife built a home on part of his property. He also owned acres of land above him. It was not farmland but open space. He always said he would not sell any of it as long as he lived. He did not. After he died, his wife sold the house, and I believe her daughter later sold the land.


I don't know from whom the Stratton Development Co. purchased their property, but I'm pretty sure that it was not farmland. As far back as I can remember, the working farms, the Galusha Farm and one owned by the Leland Towne family, have been in an area at the end of the road, on or near Blair Road.

I'd also like to add that the residents of the Stratton Road area have been very much aware that the Lowry Property is in conservation. A friend told me very recently that he remembers my impassioned plea at a town meeting many years ago. I am still passionate about the fact that the amazingly beautiful Lowry Property should be preserved.

Naturally, all of us have been very concerned about the people of the Spruces and others who need housing, but I can attest to the fact that an apartment is a very happy and comfortable home, especially for older folks. Here at Meadowvale, we have flower boxes on the porches, some tomato plants, lettuce, and herbs. I have wonderful neighbors, and we watch out for each other.

Priscilla M. Northup
Williamstown
March 22, 2013


Tags: conserved land,   letters to the editor,   lowry property,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories