Letters: Board of Selectmen: A Promise Kept?

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

For the last 13 years, it is clear that at the regular town meeting, the Williamstown electorate rejects far more of the recommendations of the Board of Selectmen (BoS) than they accept. Carolyn Henderson's letter (The Advocate, July 18) points out correctly that the current complicated and confused drama with regard to affordable housing has taken this disjuncture to a new low.
 
The special town meeting in April, and its intended vote on the status of the Lowry/Burbank property, was aborted by the carefully prepared argument of the BoS that more information on the affordable housing issue was needed, and would be provided by Town Hall. Despite the appointment of several more committees, the information has not been forthcoming in any comprehensive way, and it must be said that many have the sense that a promise has been broken and a perceived earlier pattern of obfuscation and manipulation — coupled with a strange fixation on the Lowry and Burbank properties for affordable housing — continues.
 
This perception has been reinforced by the puzzling, and as yet incompletely explained current request to the Conservation Commission by the BoS and the Affordable Housing Committee and Trust, that these properties be declared "surplus."


Given the state Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Article 97 and the other barriers against taking out of conservation the Lowry and Burbank properties (and they are in use, so how can they be "surplus?"), not to mention the almost certain risk of litigation, it appears entirely dysfunctional to continue to keep them in focus for any alternative use, much less spending town funds to assess their potential for affordable housing. Critical time is being wasted in all the current maneuvering.
 
Given the urgency of increasing the stock of affordable housing in Williamstown, it would seem much more productive to focus (for now) on the Proprietor's Field opportunity created by the generous gift of Williams College to the Higher Ground group. Although based on limited evidence, there may be the opportunity to create perhaps as many as 75 units on that site, if the Higher Ground project is combined with College plans to expand their housing on the Proprietor's Field site.
 
Returning to the question of how we in the town are to become fully informed before the anticipated special town meeting this Fall, it is clear that attending or watching the Willinet coverage of all the various meetings is totally impractical, and also incomplete. Before respect for Town Hall sinks further, the town manager and the chair, BoS, might consider appearing before the public twice monthly for questions and answers. The session might best be run as an open press conference, with ample opportunity for the audience to ask follow-up questions. I would guess that the size of the conference room in Town Hall would not be adequate for this event, given the large number of people who are already concerned about the need for, and the best path to increase affordable housing in Williamstown.

Nicholas H.Wright
Williamstown
Aug. 4, 2013


Tags: affordable housing,   conserved land,   letters to the editor,   lowry property,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Summer Street Residents Make Case to Williamstown Planning Board

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Neighbors of a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week asked the Planning Board to take a critical look at the project, which the residents say is out of scale to the neighborhood.
 
Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity was at Town Hall last Tuesday to present to the planners a preliminary plan to build five houses on a 1.75 acre lot currently owned by town's Affordable Housing Trust.
 
The subdivision includes the construction of a road from Summer Street onto the property to provide access to five new building lots of about a quarter-acre apiece.
 
Several residents addressed the board from the floor of the meeting to share their objections to the proposed subdivision.
 
"I support the mission of Habitat," Summer Street resident Christopher Bolton told the board. "There's been a lot of concern in the neighborhood. We had a neighborhood meeting [Monday] night, and about half the houses were represented.
 
"I'm impressed with the generosity of my neighbors wanting to contribute to help with the housing crisis in the town and enthusiastic about a Habitat house on that property or maybe two or even three, if that's the plan. … What I've heard is a lot of concern in the neighborhood about the scale of the development, that in a very small neighborhood of 23 houses, five houses, close together on a plot like this will change the character of the neighborhood dramatically."
 
Last week's presentation from NBHFH was just the beginning of a process that ultimately would include a definitive subdivision plan for an up or down vote from the board.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories