Pittsfield Demolition Delay Guidelines Reconsidered

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
The Historical Commission is considering whether old single-bay garages really need review before being razed.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Members of the city's Historical Commission are concerned that they are looking at too many garages, under the broad language of the city's ordinance on demolition permits.
 
A piece of local regulation designed to protect historically significant buildings may also be adding unnecessarily rigorous requirements for minor structures, like sheds and other small outbuildings of limited potential interest.
 
Since the city added a demolition delay provision to its ordinance in 2007, applications for demolition of structures more than 75 years old require review by the city's Historical Commission for a determination of their historic significance. If deemed important, the commission can recommend a six-month delay before demolition is approved, which must then be upheld by the Community Development Board.  
 
"This is really about trying to pull all these single-bay garages that are crumbling all around the city, out of this process," said City Planner Cornelius Hoss.
 
Initially, the commission was examining the possibility of recommending amending of the ordinance itself, but Hoss suggested the solution may lie in the commission adopting more detailed internal rules and guidelines determining how it evaluates demolition requests.
 
Hoss cited the similar effort by the Community Development Board in adopting rules and regulations for its operation last year.  
 
When establishing these guidelines, the Commission can decide ways of streamlining the application process for potential demolitions, which could include the sign-off of just one or two members on simple, non-historical outbuilding structures instead of needing to be vetted by the full commission.  
 
Commission member Kathleen Reilly also questioned the necessity of having applicants have to submit a Form B, the Massachusetts Historical Commission's building assessment form.
 
"It's a lot of work for them to do, and in many cases it's unnecessary," said Reilly "I think there should be some way to tell early on if it needs review."
 
Recent History of Historic Demolitions in Pittsfield:
 
Criteria would need to be established for determining what kind of structures would need more thorough examination, possibly based on the original usage. Spaces that had always been a shed or garage might have more lenient rules than former barns or carriage houses, which would necessarily need review by the Commission.
 
"I'd hate to miss something that was significant," said Todd Burdick. "What if it's your typical cinderblock 1930s garage, but something really amazing happened there?" 
 
Another issue the commission will consider is whether or not the six-month duration of the delay is sufficient. In a number of communities, said Hoss, six-month demolition restrictions have been increased to 12 or 18 months.
 
Since 2007, the commission has reviewed around a dozen demolition applications per year and has voted to recommend a demolition delay in only two cases before it. The first was two years ago for the historic former Plunkett Memorial school, which was finally purchased by Cafua Management despite denial by the City Council of a drive through permit for a proposed Dunkin Donuts. The second was in March 2013, for a former Crane & Company warehouse on Dalton Avenue.

Tags: demolition,   historical building,   historical commission,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Crosby/Conte Statement of Interest Gets OK From Council

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

Architect Carl Franceschi and Superintendent Joseph Curtis address the City Council on Tuesday.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — With the approval of all necessary bodies, the school district will submit a statement of interest for a combined build on the site of Crosby Elementary School.

The City Council on Tuesday unanimously gave Superintendent Joseph Curtis the green light for the SOI to the Massachusetts School Building Authority by April 12.

"The statement I would make is we should have learned by our mistakes in the past," Mayor Peter Marchetti said.

"Twenty years ago, we could have built a wastewater treatment plant a lot cheaper than we could a couple of years ago and we can wait 10 years and get in line to build a new school or we can start now and, hopefully, when we get into that process and be able to do it cheaper then we can do a decade from now."

The proposal rebuilds Conte Community School and Crosby on the West Street site with shared facilities, as both have outdated campuses, insufficient layouts, and need significant repair. A rough timeline shows a feasibility study in 2026 with design and construction ranging from 2027 to 2028.

Following the SOI, the next step would be a feasibility study to determine the specific needs and parameters of the project, costing about $1.5 million and partially covered by the state. There is a potential for 80 percent reimbursement through the MSBA, who will decide on the project by the end of the year.

Earlier this month, city officials took a tour of both schools — some were shocked at the conditions students are learning in.

Silvio O. Conte Community School, built in 1974, is a 69,500 square foot open-concept facility that was popular in the 1960s and 1970s but the quad classroom layout poses educational and security risks.  John C. Crosby Elementary School, built in 1962, is about 69,800 square feet and was built as a junior high school so several aspects had to be adapted for elementary use.

Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi said the walkthrough was "striking" at points, particularly at Conte, and had her thinking there was no way she would want her child educated there. She recognized that not everyone has the ability to choose where their child goes to school and "we need to do better."

"The two facilities that we are looking at I think are a great place to start," she said.

"As the Ward 6 councilor, this is where my residents and my students are going to school so selfishly yes, I want to see this project happen but looking at how we are educating Pittsfield students, this is going to give us a big bang for our buck and it's going to help improve the educational experience of a vast group of students in our city."

During the tour, Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey, saw where it could be difficult to pay attention in an open classroom with so much going on and imagined the struggle for students.

Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said, "we cannot afford not to do this" because the city needs schools that people want their children to attend.

"I know that every financial decision we make is tough but we have to figure this out. If the roof on your house were crumbling in, you'd have to figure it out and that's where we're at and we can't afford to wait any longer," she said.

"We can't afford for the sake of the children going to our schools, for the sake of our city that we want to see grow so we have to build a city where people want to go."

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso, who served on the School Building Needs Commission for about 18 years, pointed out that the panel identified a need to address Conte in 2008.

Curtis addressed questions about the fate of Conte if the build were to happen, explaining that it could be kept as an active space for community use, house the Eagle Academy or the Adult Learning Center, or house the central offices.

School attendance zones are a point of discussion for the entire school district and for this project.

"At one time I think we had 36 school buildings and now we have essentially 12 and then it would go down again but in a thoughtful way," Curtis said.

Currently, eight attendance zones designate where a student will go to elementary school. Part of the vision is to collapse those zones into three with hopes of building a plan that incorporates partner schools in each attendance zone.

"I think that going from eight schools to three would be easier to maintain and I think it would make more sense but in order to get there we will have to build these buildings and we will have to spend money," Kavey said, hoping that the city would receive the 80 percent reimbursement it is vying for.

This plan for West Street, which is subject to change, has the potential to house grades pre-kindergarten to first grade in one school and Grades 2 to 4 in another with both having their own identities and administrations. 

The districtwide vision for middle school students is to divide all students into a grade five and six school and a grade seven and eight school to ensure equity.

"The vagueness of what that looks like is worrisome to some folks that I have talked to," Lampiasi said.

Curtis emphasized that these changes would have to be voted on by the School Committee and include public input.

"We've talked about it conceptually just to illustrate a possible grade span allocation," he said. "No decisions have been made at all by the School Committee, even the grade-span proposals."

School Committee Chair William Cameron said it is civic duty of the committee and council to move forward with the SOI.
 
He explained that when seven of the city's schools were renovated in the late 1990s, the community schools were only 25 years old and Crosby was 35 years old.  The commonwealth did not deem them to be sorely in need of renovation or replacement.
 
"Now 25 years later, Crosby is physically decrepit and an eyesore. It houses students ages three to 11 in a facility meant for use by teenagers,"
 
"Conte and Morningside opened in the mid-1970s. They were built as then state-of-the-art schools featuring large elongated rectangles of open instructional space. Over almost half a century, these physical arrangements have proven to be inadequate for teaching core academic skills effectively to students, many of whom need extra services and a distraction-free environment if they are to realize their full academic potential."
 
He said  the proposal addresses a serious problem in the "economically poorest, most ethnically, culturally, and linguistically diverse area" of the city.
 
Cameron added that these facilities have been deemed unsatisfactory and need to be replaced as part of the project to reimagine how the city can best meet the educational needs of its students.  He said it is the local government's job to move this project forward to ensure that children learn in an environment that is conducive to their thriving academically.
 
"The process of meeting this responsibility needs to begin here tonight," he said.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories