Letters: NBH Board of Trustee Letter to Community

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The following is an open letter to the community received Friday afternoon from the Board of Trustees of Northern Berkshire Healthcare:

March 28, 2014

To the members of our community:

As trustees of Northern Berkshire Healthcare, we share your deep sense of sadness on this day.  We are an all-volunteer, local board; we live in this community and, like you, have depended on NARH and its affiliated practices for our medical care. We are heartbroken that so many of our friends and neighbors are losing their jobs, and that many more members of our community are facing disruptions in their medical care.

As a board, working together with our talented administrators and a team of expert advisers, we have pursued every avenue to stabilize NBH's finances. We have made difficult – and in some cases unpopular – decisions to reduce costs, including layoffs, consolidation of services, and closure of high-cost units.



But in recent years, and especially in recent months, declines in revenues have continued to accelerate. Cuts in state and federal reimbursements have had a particularly harsh effect on hospitals, like ours, that care for a high percentage of Medicare and Medicaid patients. Even reimbursements from private insurers have not kept pace with our costs.  For whatever reason, patient volumes in virtually all parts of our operations have declined, making our financial position still more precarious.

We are not alone: both nationally and in our state, a large number of hospitals – particularly small community hospitals – are in similarly difficult circumstances. Recognizing the long-term challenges, we have for more than five years been actively seeking affiliations with larger, more financially stable organizations. These efforts have been particularly intense in the past few months, and until earlier this week, we had reason to hope that such an arrangement would be possible.  When those efforts failed, our only remaining option was to close.

If, in the days ahead, members of our local and state communities can find other solutions and restore at least some of the services we are losing, we would be elated. But whatever happens, we want to say – plainly and sincerely – that we are profoundly grateful to everyone who has worked so hard and so effectively to support this organization's mission over the years, and we are particularly indebted to the hundreds of dedicated employees who – with remarkable skill and unflinching loyalty – have provided the highest quality health care to our community. You have every reason to be proud.

Yours sincerely,

The NBH Board of Trustees
Julia Bolton, Chair

The other trustees are Jane Allen, Ellen Bernstein, Dr. Chi Cheung, Dr. Jonathan Cluett, Stephen Fix, Bruce Grinnell, Richard Jette, Bryon Sherman, Dr. Susan Yates, Martha Storey, William F. Frado Jr., Dr. Jeffrey Bath, Bill Bowden and Tim Jones.

 


Tags: board of trustees,   letters to the editor,   NARH,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories