Ephs Lose Playoff to Place Second at Leaman Invite

By Emily WickstromWilliams Sports Info
Print Story | Email Story

SOUTH HADLEY, Mass. — The Williams women's golf team made a comeback attempt on Day Two of the Jack Leaman Invitational, but fell short of a victory.

After a Sunday team score of 320, the Ephs 324-320 (644) made up a six shot deficit to tie with Ithaca College's 318-326 (644). The tiebreaker went to Ithaca College because their fifth player's Day Two score of 84 bested Williams' fifth player score of 87.

Senior Georgiana Salant 72-77 (149) held her individual lead from Day One, shooting the only two-day score below 150. Second place individually went to Sharon Li from Ithaca College 76-77 (153).

Freshman Tracey Kim 79-81 (160) played a solid weekend and tied for sixth individually. Junior Shelby Shote and Senior Emily Wickstrom also shot 81 on Day Two, to shoot 167 and 168 overall respectively. Freshman Sarah Hasselman 87-87 (174) rounded out the team. Junior Paige Whidbee played as an individual and shot a solid 82-84 (166).


Irrigation holes on the greens at The Orchards made putting difficult, but the weather held up well. The scores overall were higher at The Orchards, but it seemed to play easier than Hickory Ridge on Day One.

Head Coach Erika DeSanty said, "for our team it was a disappointing weekend overall, but our hope is that it will focus us for a great week of practice."

The Ephs will play the Williams College Northeast Elite Invitational at Taconic next weekend.

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories