Ephs Lose NESCAC Men's Tennis Semis to Amherst

By Scott SheltonWilliams Sports Info
Print Story | Email Story

BRUNSWICK, Maine — The dream of a repeat NESCAC Championship ended Saturday afternoon in the semifinals for the Ephs, as they were defeated by the Lord Jeffs of Amherst College by the margin of 5-1.

With the win, the Jeffs reach the 30-win milestone for their season, putting their record at 30-3, while the Ephs drop to 15-6.

Everything went the way of the Jeffs in doubles, as they managed to sweep the points on all three courts. The Jeff senior duo of Joey Fritz and Justin Reindel fended off a late surge by Eph senior Matt Micheli and freshman Conrad Harron at one-doubles to take their match 8-6, and the same score was repeated on the other two courts, as the Jeff sophomore combination of Andrew Yaraghi and Aaron Revzin saw off Eph freshman Rohan Shastri and sophomore Jose Raventos at two-doubles and the Jeff pairing of senior Chris Dale and sophomore Michael Solimano did the same on Court 3 to the Eph sophomore combo of Brian Astrachan and Alexander Schidlovsky.

The Ephs stared down the daunting 3-0 deficit, but weren’t entirely undone by it. Raventos came out firing on all cylinders at six-singles, as he quickly got the Ephs on the scoreboard by cruising past Jeff sophomore Ben Fife 6-1, 6-0.

That would be all the Ephs would get out of the match, however, as the Jeffs stepped up their game and closed out the match. First, it was Reindel at the number five position, who dismissed Eph sophomore Howard Weiss 6-1, 6-1, and to finish off the match, it was freshman Anton Zykov, who allowed Shastri little opportunity for a comeback at three-singles, clinching the match for the Jeffs with a 6-4, 6-2 win.

The Ephs now await the draw for the NCAA tournament.

Amherst 5, Williams 1

Joey Fritz (AMHERST) vs. Matt Micheli (WILLIAMS) 7-5, 5-2, DNF
Michael Solimano (AMHERST) vs. Conrad Harron (WILLIAMS) 5-7, 6-4 DNF


Anton Zykov (AMHERST) def. Rohan Shastri (WILLIAMS) 6-4, 6-2
Andrew Yaraghi (AMHERST) vs. Alexander Schidlovsky (WILLIAMS) 3-6, 6-2, 0-1 DNF
Justin Reindel (AMHERST) def. Howard Weiss (WILLIAMS) 6-1, 6-1
Jose Raventos (WILLIAMS) def. Ben Fife (AMHERST) 6-1, 6-0

Joey Fritz/Justin Reindel (AMHERST) def. Matt Micheli/Conrad Harron (WILLIAMS) 8-6
Andrew Yaraghi/Aaron Revzin (AMHERST) def. Rohan Shastri/Jose Raventos (WILLIAMS) 8-6
Michael Solimano/Chris Dale (AMHERST) def. Alexander Schidlovsky/Brian Astrachan (WILLIAMS) 8-6

Match Notes:
Williams 15-6, nationally ranked #11
Amherst 30-3, nationally ranked #4

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories