Amherst Defeats Ephs to Earn NESCAC Title

By Andree HellerWilliams Sports Info
Print Story | Email Story

BRUNSWICK, Maine — The women's tennis team (19-2/7-2 NESCAC) fell just short of claiming a NESCAC Championship title, losing to rival Amherst 5-1. Amherst'S (19-3/9-0 NESCAC) win marked the eighth time in the last 10 years that they have won the conference title. The only two loses the Ephs have had this year have come at the hands of the Jeffs.

Williams initially jumped out to an early lead, with Kathleen Elkins and Maria Pylypiv winning their doubles match 8-2. Amherst responded though, claiming the rest of the matches on the day. A few matches had to be left unfinished, with Williams ahead in two of the three, however it would not be enough to catch up.

Amherst earns an automatic bid to the NCAA Division III Championship, while Williams must wait for an at-large bid when selections are announced on Monday. That being said, the Ephs are virtually guaranteed a spot given that they have won a record six straight NCAA titles. They expect to be named a regional host for the opening rounds of play this coming week.

Singles competition

1. Jordan Brewer (AMH) def. Kara Shoemaker (WIL) 6-2, 7-6

2. Gabby Devlin (AMH) def. Kathleen Elkins (WIL) 6-1, 6-1

3. Jen Newman (AMH) vs. Linda Shin (WIL) 4-6, 6-4, 2-3, unfinished


4. Sue Ghosh (AMH) def. Maria Pylpiv (WIL) 6-3, 6-1

5. Zoe Pangalos (AMH) vs. Rebecca Curran (WIL) 6-7, 0-1, unfinished

6. Sarah Monteagudo (AMH) vs. Monica Pastor (WIL) 6-7, 1-2, unfinished

Doubles competition

1. Gabby Devlin/Jordan Brewer (AMH) def. Kara Shoemaker/Rebecca Curran (WIL) 8-4

2. Kathleen Elkins/Maria Pylpiv (WIL) def. Jen Newman/Zoe Pangalos (AMH) 8-2

3. Sarah Monteagudo/Safi Aly (AMH) def. Linda Shin/Hannah Atkinson (WIL) 8-5

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories