Williamstown Fire District Considering Town's Overtures

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Williamstown Fire Chief Craig Pedercini, left, and Prudential Committee member Ed McGowan.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The committee that oversees the Williamstown Fire District on Wednesday discussed a couple of opportunities to work with the town's government.
 
Recently, town officials have suggested that the two municipal bodies could align their annual meetings and partner to use solar renewable energy credits that are generated from a proposed solar array on the town's capped landfill.
 
On Wednesday, Fire Chief Craig Pedercini told the Prudential Committee that he had been approached by a town employee about the possibility the district may be able to use some of the energy credits.
 
The district's clerk/treasurer, Corydon Thurston, said he was not sure whether the credits would help defray the cost of the district's largest electrical expense: the town's street lamps.
 
"Street lights are charged a flat rate," Thurston said. "They're not metered."
 
But the committee agreed that the prospect was worth looking into and discussing with the electric company.
 
The committee also did not reject out of hand a proposal to move the district's annual meeting to the same date and location as annual town meeting, but the Prudential Committee didn't express any particular urgency to do so, either.
 
It has been suggested that holding the two meetings on the same date would increase voters' participation in and awareness of the district, which is a completely independent municipal entity outside town government with its own taxing authority. Traditionally, the district holds its annual meeting and election of Prudential Committee members one week after annual town meeting.
 
Prudential Committee Chairman John Notsley said he had begun some research to see how other fire districts in the commonwealth schedule their annual meetings.
 
He found that in the town of Barnstable on Cape Cod, which has 8,000 voters and a fire district budget of about $10 million, 67 voters participated in the district's annual meeting.
 
Prudential Committee member Ed McGowan noted that Williamstown's participation rate is comparable if not higher. In 2013, 42 residents turned out for the district's election; the Williamstown Fire District has a budget of about $470,000 and about 4,600 voters.
 
Notsley said that while he discussed with one member of the Board of Selectmen the possibility of aligning the district's annual meeting with the town's, he was waiting for a more formal approach from the chairman of the Board of Selectmen. In the meantime, Notsley indicated the issue is not pressing.
 
"I've always been of the opinion the reason we don't get high attendance is ... people are very satisfied with the job being done, and the [annual budget] expense is minimal," Notsley said.
 
Speaking of that budget, Thurston told the Prudential Committee on Wednesday the district is on track to finish fiscal 2014 in the black.
 
"We haven't been audited yet, but even with some unexpected expenses, it turns out we came in fine," Thurston said. "Looking at Article V, which is the omnibus budget, there's $4,000 to spare. ... We didn't tap the reserve fund."
 
The district's stabilization fund, which is used to replace capital equipment (trucks) stands at $411,700 and is fully funded, Thurston said.
 
Thurston credited Pedercini with helping the district come in on budget despite the unexpected expenses. The district's audit is scheduled to begin on Aug. 21.
 
In other business on Wednesday night, the Prudential Committee heard a request from Church Street resident Shira Wohlberg to look into excessive lighting from street lamps in her neighborhood.
 
McGowan, who checked out the neighborhood, said he agreed with Wohlberg. The committee decided to investigate the problem further and consider either putting a hood on one of the lamps, having a lower wattage bulb installed or removing one of the lamps from the street altogether.

Tags: alternative energy,   prudential committee,   solar,   town meeting,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Affordable Housing Trust Hears Objections to Summer Street Proposal

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Neighbors concerned about a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week raised the specter of a lawsuit against the town and/or Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity.
 
"If I'm not mistaken, I think this is kind of a new thing for Williamstown, an affordable housing subdivision of this size that's plunked down in the middle, or the midst of houses in a mature neighborhood," Summer Street resident Christopher Bolton told the Affordable Housing Trust board, reading from a prepared statement, last Wednesday. "I think all of us, the Trust, Habitat, the community, have a vested interest in giving this project the best chance of success that it can have. We all remember subdivisions that have been blocked by neighbors who have become frustrated with the developers and resorted to adversarial legal processes.
 
"But most of us in the neighborhood would welcome this at the right scale if the Trust and Northern Berkshire Habitat would communicate with us and compromise with us and try to address some of our concerns."
 
Bolton and other residents of the neighborhood were invited to speak to the board of the trust, which in 2015 purchased the Summer Street lot along with a parcel at the corner of Cole Avenue and Maple Street with the intent of developing new affordable housing on the vacant lots.
 
Currently, Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity, which built two homes at the Cole/Maple property, is developing plans to build up to five single-family homes on the 1.75-acre Summer Street lot. Earlier this month, many of the same would-be neighbors raised objections to the scale of the proposed subdivision and its impact on the neighborhood in front of the Planning Board.
 
The Affordable Housing Trust board heard many of the same arguments at its meeting. It also heard from some voices not heard at the Planning Board session.
 
And the trustees agreed that the developer needs to engage in a three-way conversation with the abutters and the trust, which still owns the land, to develop a plan that is more acceptable to all parties.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories