Williams Men's Cross Country Second at Purple Valley Classic

Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. -- Twenty-six teams from across the Northeast traveled to Williamstown for the annual Purple Valley Classic
 
Among the field were nationally ranked squads from Williams (sixth), MIT (eighth), Colby (17th), Amherst (21st), Middlebury (29th), and Tufts (30th).
 
The 8-kilometer course at Mount Greylock Regional  School is traditionally challenging, often producing results a full minute slower than expected. The high temperature of 78 degrees made for a beautiful day but a tough race. Many of these teams will expect to be back in Williamstown for the NCAA DIII New England Regional Championship on Nov. 15.
 
Sophomore David Chelimo of Colby College won the men’s 8k in a time of 25 minutes, 42 seconds and led his team to victory over several NESCAC rivals
 
Williams senior Colin Cotton and junior Bijan Mazaheri were the second and third finishers, in 25:45 and 26:15, respectively. Freshman Mohamed Hussein of Amherst finished fourth in a time of 26:25 and junior Spencer Wenck of MIT finished fifth in 26:27.
 
Colby packed its top five runners among the top 20 finishers for a team score of 55 points. Not far behind was Williams with 63 points and MIT with 72 points. Amherst was fourth with 89 points, while Tufts was fifth with 120 points.
 
Williams' women finished fourth in the varsity 6K behind MIT, Middlebury and Tufts.
 
MIT ran away with the team title with four runners in the top 10 and 36 points, well ahead of Middelbury's 65 points.
 
MIT's Sarah Quinn won the inidividual title with a time of 22:24. Williams junior Lacey Serletti was fifth, in 22:48.
 
Williams runs in the Paul Short Invitational next week at Lehigh University.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories