WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Within 24 hours of the violence in Charlottesville, Va., more than 300 area residents circled Field Park to protest the actions of white supremacists.
The gathering swiftly organized by Greylock Together was one of nearly 800 known rallies against racism across the nation, including one at Park Square in Pittsfield by the Four Freedoms Coalition.
"A lot of people wanted to get to together and show support for our country against white nationalism, against domestic terrorism," Geraldine Shen said as a cacophony of horns blared in support as drivers entered the rotary. "I think people in our group are very action oriented and this was a good way to say this is an action that we could do."
Charlottesville was riven by protests as hundreds of neo-Nazis and white nationalist groups descended on the town over the weekend purportedly to protest the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee. There were small breakouts of violence between them and anti-racists and leftist groups; on Saturday, a 32-year-old woman was killed and more than two dozen injured when a car driven by an alleged white supremacist rammed through a march on a side street.
"We're just terrified at the state of the world right now," Christopher Thomas of North Adams, holding a Black Lives Matter sign, said.
He said the president hadn't seemed too concerned when David Duke, a member of the Ku Klux Klan, had endorsed him. Maybe that was just political ignorance at the time, Thomas said, but now someone has died and he felt the president had not taken a strong stand against racists but instead was talking about "many sides."
As 5 p.m. neared, the rally had dwindled to a few dozen people holding signs ranging from a simple "Love" to rainbows to "Change the system, save the world."
The local Greylock Together group formed in the wake of the last election to advocate for issues important to the community such as the environment, civil rights, health care and voting.
The group meets every other week and Sunday happened to be its regular meeting time.
"It was a natural extension to do something about what we saw happening in Virginia," Shen said. A notice and a Facebook post went out late Saturday afternoon, resulting in the high turnout on Sunday.
"It's important for people to feel like there is something they can physically do," she said. "Obviously this isn't solving the problem but it shows that our community is strong in our resolve."
Thomas was more direct in why he felt important to show up.
"I'm furious and I'm really mad and I don't know what to do and I'm trying to be peaceful," he said. "But I want to show I'm mad and I want to support the people who feel scared."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern
By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter. click for more
Developer David Traggorth asked the trustees to make the contribution from its coffers to help unlock an additional $5.4 million in state funds for the planned 54-unit apartment building at the south end of the Cable Mills site.
click for more
The donors, who wish to remain anonymous, say the gift reflects their desire to not only support Williams but also President Maud S. Mandel's strategic vision and plan for the college.
click for more
Neighbors of a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week asked the Planning Board to take a critical look at the project, which the residents say is out of scale to the neighborhood. click for more