Letter: Mount Greylock Educators Want Current Contracts Honored

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Educators from what will be a unified Mount Greylock Regional School District are demanding that the transition committee handling contract negotiations honor existing agreements until a new contract is settled, as well as establish a more realistic time frame for negotiating a regional agreement.

We are all in favor of creating a unified regional pre-K through-12 district, but not at the expense of cheating educators out of wages and benefits they have already negotiated. The transition committee’s tactics to expedite a complex process and deny educators what they are owed is clearly not in the spirit of regionalization.

In a show of solidarity, educators from Lanesborough, Williamstown and the regional high school will bring their concerns to the Mount Greylock Transition Committee when it meets at 6 p.m. Thursday night at the Mount Greylock Regional High School library.


Educators have made a good faith effort to fulfill the committee's plan to settle a new contract within six months of the start of bargaining, which began in January. Creating a whole new contract typically takes at least 12 months to 18 months. And until a new contract is in place, all existing contracts should stay in effect in their entirety.

And with dozens of their proposals having still gone unanswered by the committee, negotiators for the educators have agreed to enter into mediation with the school committee.

I am confident that we can come to an agreement that is fair and achieves the goals of creating a unified regional school district.

Marty Walter
Vice president of the Mount Greylock Educators Association

This was sent as a press release.

 

 

 


Tags: MGRSD,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories