image description
Gov. Charlie Baker and Lt. Gov. Karyn Polito at Wednesday's briefing in Boston.

Officials Optimistic Efforts May Be 'Flattening Curve' of COVID-19 Cases

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

BOSTON — State officials are "cautiously optimistic" that efforts to test and social distance may be flattening the curve even as cases of COVID-19 continue to rise. 

"We're continually reviewing the modeling, but right now we see evidence that we're still on the upward slope of this pandemic," said Gov. Charlie Baker at Wednesday's daily briefing on the COVID-19 outbreak. "For example, the average new coronavirus test in Massachusetts has been rising steadily for three weeks, the percent of people testing positive continues to rise and reach the new high on Monday. ...
 
"At the same time we've not seen the same steep acceleration seen in either Wuhan (China), New York or other places."
 
The state has tested 87,511 people and confirmed 16,790 cases of COVID-19; at least 433 people have died from complications of the novel coronavirus.
 
Baker said the increases positive cases are expected as testing continues to ramp up across the state. There are some 25 labs now processing testing and the Department of Public Health is collaborating with Partners in Health to deploy some 1,000 medical students and volunteers to work on tracing where outbreaks are occurring. 
 
The twin goals of testing and tracing, which has been used successfully in places such as South Korea, it geared to containing the novel coronavirus by alerting those who may have been exposed to the contagious disease. The effort was handicapped in the early going because of the lack of testing equipment from the federal  government and is still limited to those who might have been exposed or who are showing symptoms -- even though it COVID-19 is being found in people without symptoms. 
 
However, Massachusetts continues to be a top tester per capita in the United States and more testing facilities are being established, including one at the Big E in West Springfield that will be able to test 200 first-responders a day. 
 
A number of other measures were also announced on Wednesday including updated standards of care for health-care facilities to promote consistency and transparency in care and allocation of resources. 
 
Legislation has been filed to protect health-care workers, volunteers and facilities from liability during the pandemic. 
 
"We're in unprecedented times where providers may be forced to make difficult choices, and we're asking them to operate in conditions that they've never planned for," said the governor. "We need to make sure that fear of getting sued doesn't prevent them from being able to do what they need to do to treat as many people as possible."
 
Grocery stores are also now limited to 40 percent of their maximum occupancy unless that is less than 25 people and reiterates the need for having cleaning wipes and hand sanitizers on hand for customers and staff. 
 
As he has daily, the governor urged residents to continue sanitary habits, social distance at least 6 feet and stay home as much as possible. There has been a 60 percent reduction in retail and recreation since March 8, a 75 percent reduction in  mobility related to public transit and 63 percent reduction in park activity. 
 
All these efforts may be paying out with the gradual curve in positive cases that may flatten a surge of cases ranging from 47,000 to 172,000 over the next couple weeks.
 
"But it means we're cautiously optimistic that our social distancing, essential services orders, and other measures that we and others have put in place, are helping to flatten the curve," Baker said. "We are entering a period of time where we could be putting serious strain on our health-care system."

Tags: COVID-19,   


More Coronavirus Updates

Keep up to date on the latest COVID-19 news:


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Be careful when naming beneficiaries

You might not have thought much about beneficiary designations — but they can play a big role in your estate planning.
 
When you purchase insurance policies and open investment accounts, such as your IRA, you'll be asked to name a beneficiary, and, in some cases, more than one. This might seem easy, especially if you have a spouse and children, but if you experience a major life event, such as a divorce or a death in the family, you may need to make some changes — because beneficiary designations carry a lot of weight under the law.
 
In fact, these designations can supersede the instructions you may have written in your will or living trust, so everyone in your family should know who is expected to get which assets. One significant benefit of having proper beneficiary designations in place is that they may enable beneficiaries to avoid the time-consuming — and possibly expensive — probate process.
 
The beneficiary issue can become complex because not everyone reacts the same way to events such as divorce — some people want their ex-spouses to still receive assets while others don't. Furthermore, not all the states have the same rules about how beneficiary designations are treated after a divorce. And some financial assets are treated differently than others.
 
Here's the big picture: If you've named your spouse as a beneficiary of an IRA, bank or brokerage account, insurance policy, will or trust, this beneficiary designation will automatically be revoked upon divorce in about half the states. So, if you still want your ex-spouse to get these assets, you will need to name them as a non-spouse beneficiary after the divorce. But if you've named your spouse as beneficiary for a 401(k) plan or pension, the designation will remain intact until and unless you change it, regardless of where you live.
 
However, in community property states, couples are generally required to split equally all assets they acquired during their marriage. When couples divorce, the community property laws require they split their assets 50/50, but only those assets they obtained while they lived in that state. If you were to stay in the same community property state throughout your marriage and divorce, the ownership issue is generally straightforward, but if you were to move to or from one of these states, it might change the joint ownership picture.
 
Thus far, we've only talked about beneficiary designation issues surrounding divorce. But if an ex-spouse — or any beneficiary — passes away, the assets will generally pass to a contingent beneficiary — which is why it's important that you name one at the same time you designate the primary beneficiary. Also, it may be appropriate to name a special needs trust as beneficiary for a family member who has special needs or becomes disabled. If this individual were to be the direct beneficiary, any assets passing directly into their hands could affect their eligibility for certain programs.
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories