The economy is slowing. Inflation is climbing. Investors are worried that these trends appear to be a recipe for the "S" word.

 

The economic concept of stagflation where the witches' brew of a faltering economy, aided and abetted by skyrocketing inflation, harkens back to the malaise of the late 1970s. At that time, interest rates rose to nearly 20 percent. Inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), reached an annual average of 13.5 percent by 1980. Oil prices (like today) surpassed $100 a barrel.

 

Blame for this period of stagflation fell squarely on OPEC, a newly formed energy cartel of oil producers, that decided to raise oil prices sharply after decades of artificially controlled suppressed prices by mostly Western nations and their energy producers.

 

Since energy is used in so many of the industrialized economies to produce just about everything, this oil shock reverberated throughout the economy. As costs rose, prices pushed higher causing more and more inflation (sound familiar). It didn't help that for the most part, monetary expansion was the name of the game throughout most of that decade.

 

Looking back, economic growth and unemployment in the 1970s was uneven at best with two recessions, one at the beginning of the decade, and another from 1973 through 1975.

 

It's not hard to point to the similarities between then and now.

 

Today, we are confronting similar supply shocks, which began during the pandemic and have since been amplified by the onset of the Ukrainian War. We have also been functioning under a highly expansionary monetary policy that has been in place since the financial crisis of 2008-2009. Where we differ today is in the areas of economic growth and employment. Neither qualify as coming even close to stagnation.

 

Proponents of stagflation would say that it is only a question of time before the economy slows and is in fact doing so as I write this. They would be right, at least in the short-term. Most economists expect this present quarter to register anemic growth. Yet, for the year 2022, the expected growth rate is still 3 percent and 2.3 percent for 2023.

 

However, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the resulting sanctions may trigger recessions in both warring countries. Theses actions will also spill over to the European Community (EU) and directly impact its economies. It will also create even further supply chain obstacles and higher inflation.

 

One would expect that the U.S. economy will feel these impacts as well. The Conference Board estimates that these headwinds could cut as much as half a point or more from our growth rate.  On the unemployment front, we are nowhere near where we were in the 1970s. Right now, unemployment is at a low of 3.8 percent. And readers must remember that global economies are less energy intensive than they were back then. In a research report, UBS Wealth Management USA argued that "oil intensity of global GDP has dropped by 25 percent since 1990 (and by more than 50 percent since the early 1970s when oil price shocks caused recessions)."

 

However, what we don't know is what economic impact the Fed's intention to tighten monetary policy will have on the economy. Investors point to what happened when Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker addressed inflation back then. He raised interest rates to double-digit levels, drove inflation down, but also sent the economy into a deep recession. Could the Fed do that again?

 

I doubt that today's Fed will ignore the past and simply "do another Volcker." But make no mistake, the Fed is going to raise interest rates next Wednesday, March 16 by 25 basis points and likely raise rates again at the next two meetings. How will the markets handle that?

 

We are the lower end of the box on the S&P 500 Index (the lower end of that box is 4,310, give or take 20 points). I believe markets will continue to move on every headline between now and the FOMC meeting next Wednesday.  If I were a betting man, I would say markets like what Chair Jerome Powell has to say. In the meantime, stocks are managing to hold up and will continue to do so, barring a game changer in the Ukraine conflict.

 

Commodity prices are flying. Nickel doubled in price in two days. Wheat is up 50 percent and has experienced trading halts for five straight days. Gold has breached $2,000 an ounce and we all know what has happened to the price of oil. How long can it last?

 

As longtime readers know, I formally recommended commodities as out-performers back in January 2021. At that time, I was bullish on oil, copper, and soft commodities like food and lumber. I also liked crypto currencies. As for precious metals like gold and silver, not so much.

 

Back then, most market participants had dumped gold and were piling into Bitcoin and the like. These digital currencies were touted as the "new gold" and precious metals were relegated to the sidelines.

 

It wasn’t until five months later (May 2021) that I began to warm up to precious metals as cryptos hit all-time highs. As I said back then, "I believe we may be on the cusp of a new move higher in this precious metal (and silver along with it)." But it wasn’t as if gold had gone nowhere in the meantime.

 

Gold made what I believe was a cycle low back in November 2020 at $1,767.20 an ounce and hit $1,882.70 by the time I recommended it. That amounted to a 6.5 percent gain from the cycle low. The gold price hit $2,082 this week before profit taking took it back down below $2,000 per ounce. Most of the other commodities on my list have done equally as well, or even better. Granted, the gains are good, but what do we do now?

 

Unlike many investments, the time to buy commodities is when prices continue to climb higher as they have been doing for the past year or so. Traditionally, as prices increase, experienced traders know to chase prices higher. A virtuous and somewhat vicious cycle of higher and higher prices erupts. That behavior has hit home to many investors during the past few weeks. Commodities are in a parabolic move higher.

 

Common sense would tell you that this phase of price gains, were it to continue, would cause severe dislocations in the economy. These stratospheric prices would boost the cost of manufacturing inputs to the point where production would begin to falter. Inflation would leap, and prices skyrocket for goods to the point that most global economies would fall into a recession, or a period of stagflation. As such, I believe it is time to take some profits.

 

The problem with calling a top in commodities in this environment is that their rise (and ultimate fall) depends on several geopolitical events that cannot be predicted. Take it from an old-time, commodity investor, the way to handle this rise is to begin selling into these price gains. I made my bones in the commodity market by buying and selling gold and silver, while working as a bunker oil salesman in New York Harbor. I made enough to pay my way through graduate school back in 1979 and I never looked back.

 

Since then, over the decades, I have seen several huge moves in commodity cycles. The most successful traders I know begin to sell (slowly) when there are a series of limit-up moves and/or trading halts. That is the environment we are in today.

 

 Another sell sign is when analysts and experts begin to increase their price targets for various commodities. Recently, I am beginning to see forecasts that gold prices could get above $3,000 per ounce, and oil prices as high as $200 per barrel. That should tell you to start profit-taking. My own view is that after the end of the present geopolitical turmoil, we could see gold down several hundred dollars by mid-year.

 

Commodities are soaring. Interest rates are falling. Stocks can't get out of their own way. All of this is occurring, while the first war in decades continues to rage in Ukraine. Seems to me that any gains in the market averages next week will remain dead cat bounces in this bear market.

 

Yes, I hate to be a squeaky wheel, but I've got to call it like I see it. We have a much greater chance of sliding lower from here than higher. Here's why.

 

Investors received a new lease on life this week when Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, testifying before the Senate banking Committee, triggered a market rise in the averages.  All he did was relieve a little market angst by stating that a 25 rather than a 50-basis point move should be expected later this month at the FOMC meeting. In that context, I would label the resulting short market bounce as simply a relief rally.

 

Initially, the markets rallied because the Fed is not raising rates as high as expected. That usually means higher stock prices, so the bounce was understandable. But the reason the Fed plans to raise rates in the first place is due to soaring inflation. What did investors do?

 

Prices of basic and precious metals, like aluminum, nickel, copper, gold, silver, and food commodities like wheat, corn, fertilizer, and of course, oil and gas were bid up leading the market gains.  The combination of these Russian fear trades, plus inflation plays, continued to lead gains throughout the week. Technology and speculative areas were largely left in the dust.

 

This action has only pushed up commodity prices even higher. Now what will that do to the inflation rate?  Push it even higher, and possibly make the Fed reconsider its plans. Those bond traders who were betting on a "one and done" interest rate hike have changed their forecast. The betting is that there will be at least two more hikes coming before June.

 

On Thursday night, March 4, the Russians attacked Ukraine's largest nuclear facility, which provides 20 percent of European electricity. Fortunately, there did not appear to be any leakage of radioactivity but that could have occurred. The U.S. dollar jumped more than 1 percent, an extraordinary event, indicating a "run for the hills" mentality overwhelming investors.

 

 Unfortunately, this is the kind of market where most market participants are headline driven. Given the circumstances, that is understandable. Algo traders are careening from buys to sells as news pops up on the terminals. Whether it is testimony from Powell, Russian cease fire rumors, oil embargo news, or new atrocities in Ukraine, stock prices either crater or explode hour to hour.

 

Few of these traders know or care about things like price/earnings ratios, balance sheets, corporate earnings or even macro data like the positive gains in employment we saw last month. Remember, most market participants have little to no experience in a higher interest rate environment nor how to invest in equities when inflation is rising. As for maneuvering world markets on a war footing, few have any experience at all.

 

It is obvious that just about everyone is focused on the oil price. The higher oil climbs, the greater the probability that inflation will continue higher, and the greater the chance that global economic growth slows.  Analysts at Bank of America, for example, have raised their forecast for oil to $120 per barrel by the middle of 2022.

 

At the present price of oil, the U. K's National Institute for Economic and Social Research estimates that the Russian-Ukraine conflict could hack $1 trillion off the value of the world economy. It could also add another 3% to the world's overall inflation rate. Predictably, Eastern Europe would get hurt the most. Those numbers worsen as the oil price rises.

 

There are all sorts of worst-case estimates as to where oil prices could go depending on whether there is an embargo on Russian oil, a reduction in exports due to war damage, or if Russia curtails energy supplies to Europe in response to sanctions.

 

It appears to me that the markets have settled on a worst-case price of between $120-$130-barrel oil at this time. If that were to happen, and remain at that level over several months, the impact on the U.S. economy would be to slow growth and bring on the specter of stagflation. I believe it is way too early to predict that outcome.  I did forecast back in December 2021, however, that this scenario would begin to make the rounds on Wall Street about now. In my opinion, the onset of stagflation would be a stretch, given the present robust growth rate of U.S. GDP and the Fed's intention of tightening monetary policy beginning in mid-March.

 

As for the future of the markets, I am sticking to my guns. Stocks will remain in a box until after the March 2022 meeting of the FOMC. That means we could easily test the lows of January 2022 again, either before or after the Fed hikes interest rates. 

 

Crude oil hit $110 a barrel this week. The price of natural gas rose in sympathy. In addition to the already announced economic sanctions, demands to add an embargo on Russian energy exports are increasing. Be careful what you wish for.

 

Most of the world governments have already instituted several hard-hitting sanctions against Russia. Financially, the harshest step so far has been barring Russia's central bank and several large Russian banks from using the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT) system. SWIFT is a messaging network used by almost all financial institutions to quickly and accurately receive information such as money transfer instructions. As such, the entire Russian financial system has been cut off from the international financial system. It was considered a "financial nuclear weapon" by most credit analysts.

 

Most bystanders neither understand, nor care about this action. That indifference may be a mistake. No one really knows the ramifications of such a move on the global financial system. While the financial isolation cripples Russia, it may also have unpredictable consequences for other financial institutions.

 

How many of our U.S. or European banks are exposed to Russian debt, for example? How will they receive payments from Russian debtors? Are there assets, holdings, or obligations that are now in jeopardy because of these sanctions? Could the blowback take down parts of our global financial system along with Russia? Global investors are not waiting around to find out. Prices of banks and other financial institutions in world markets have been a free fall.

 

As for the energy market, only Canada has said it was banning Russian oil imports. So far, no other nation has targeted Russia's energy complex directly. Several global oil companies have announced they will be pulling out of activities in Russia. In the private energy markets, there is a clear preference to avoid buying Russian crude, which constitutes a semi-embargo situation right now. But most of the nations opposed to Russia's aggression have kept silent on energy embargos.

 

The problem with an energy embargo is that, even before Russia's evasion of the Ukraine, oil supplies have been tight with supply constraints swamped by increasing global demand. Any additional reduction in supply could not only send the inflation rate much higher but might also plunge the world and the U.S. into a recession.  That said, could the worsening situation in Ukraine precipitate a Russian embargo despite the economic risks?

 

It could, which is why the International Energy Agency decided to hold an "emergency" meeting on Tuesday, March 1. They discussed what IEA members can do to stabilize energy markets and announced a 60-million barrel release from strategic reserves. The U.S. is providing half of that amount. Naturally, several other nations are planning to release energy supplies from their strategic stockpiles. That would amount to a drop in the bucket, however, since those emergency supplies would only cover energy demand for a week at most. A reduction in government taxes on gasoline might help, but not by much.

 

There are two other avenues that the world could use to limit the rise in energy prices. One would be a breakthrough in the Iran/U.S. nuclear negotiations. The 10-month talks have been difficult, since under the last administration, former president Donald Trump arbitrarily quit the negotiation process. The Biden administration revived the talks, but the wall of Iranian distrust has been difficult to climb.

 

The talks are dragging on over resolving questions over uranium traces found at several old but undeclared sites in Iran. "Significant differences" keep both sides from signing a pact. But as energy prices climb higher, the one million barrels of oil that Iran could sell on the open markets become increasingly attractive for a country suffering the impact of economic sanctions. From the U.S. side, those extra barrels could go a long way to corral rising oil prices, at least in the short term.

 

OPEC is also another wild card that could help increase supply somewhat. The oil producer's cartel met on Wednesday, March 2, but made no move to increase supply beyond their already announced program. Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE could increase production, but that would put them at odds with Russia, a member in good standing in OPEC-plus.

 

All of the above, I am afraid, might knock the price of oil down by $5 or so in the very short-term, but I suspect that given the ongoing risks of a war in Ukraine, oil will make higher highs in the weeks ahead.