image description
Councilor at Large Melissa Mazzeo is pushing for single-use biodegradable bags to be available.

Plastic Bag Ban One Step Closer to Passing

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council's Ordinance and Rules Committee finally came to an agreement on a plastic bag ban.
 
A proposal to ban thin, single-use plastic bags, which are primarily used to bag groceries at the supermarket, has been working its way through the legislative process for nearly six years. It was proposed by attorney Rinaldo Del Gallo as a measure to reduce the amount of plastic bags causing damage to the environment.
 
On Monday, the Ordinance and Rules Committee finally agreed to the language of the ordinance and it will now go to the full council.
 
"The whole ordinance is banning the traditional single-use plastic bag," said Ward 3 Councilor Nicholas Caccamo who had gone through an effort to mesh language from two separate ordinances in hopes to craft one that matched the concerns councilors have raised through the process. 
 
"I did my best to blend them into something where we could start and achieves a lot of our goals."
 
Caccamo's version of an ordinance served as the basis for Monday's discussion, a day the committee had previously voted to set as a hard deadline for voting on the ordinance.
 
Councilor at Large Melissa Mazzeo had the floor for over an hour as she talked her way through the draft ordinance and proposed a number of amendments. All of her amendments were easily approved by the rest of the group.
 
However, one point of contention came between Mazzeo and Ward 6 Councilor John Krol over biodegradable plastic bags.
 
Mazzeo focused on allowing stores to switch to the biodegradable plastic bags, saying most retailers will turn to paper bags that come with a number of environmental concerns as well. She hoped to allow room in the provision for retailers to switch to bags that make look, feel, and act like the traditional plastic bags but could also be better for the environment. 
 
"We clearly know a paper bag costs more and is more harmful to the environment than a plastic bag," Mazzeo said, saying she doesn't want to contribute to one problem while trying to address another one.
 
The council had been given a presentation by such a company making those biodegradable bags. Mazzeo believes those can take the place of plastic and crafted the language to allow that.
 
Krol, however, said those bags aren't as nice as the company that manufacturers them say. He said the bags will biodegrade but only in certain conditions, conditions that aren't often met. He said allowing stores to move to those types of bags goes against the point of the ban.
 
"These compostable plastic bags are simply not biodegradable like paper is," Krol said, calling the company's labeling of the products as being biodegradable a "marketing scheme." 
 
Councilor at Large Peter White agreed, saying he has a concern about opening the door for micro-plastics. White and Krol, however, couldn't sway the other three members of the committee to join their side and  Krol's motion to eliminate language allowing those bags failed.
 
Krol did get support for an amendment to have stores charge customers at least 5 cents for those type of bags. He said that would provide a disincentive for people to want to use them. 
 
White was able to convince enough of his colleagues to fast forward the implementation date. The proposal originally called for an effective date one year after passage but White amended that to go into effect on Sept. 1, 2019. White said the ban given to the committee from the Green Commission last year called for a September start and this would follow that intention.
 
He added that the discussion has been ongoing in Pittsfield for a long time while other towns have been passing bans, and the state is considering one. He believes most in the industry will be able to make a fairly quick transition and if not, there is an option of filing for a hardship.
 
"Big Y has already done this. The state Legislature could have something voted on by September this year," White said.
 
The push to ban plastic bags has been growing and maybe the biggest shoe dropped late last year when Boston's ban went into effect. Earlier this year, Big Y had opted to voluntarily switch away from plastic bags across the chain because of the number of bans.
 
"Our customers and the communities we serve have made it quite clear that they prefer more environmentally friendly alternatives. We look forward to implementing this new program in all of our retail locations," Richard D. Bossie, Big Y vice president of store operations, said in the statement at the time. 
 
But not all retailers had been so supportive of it. Representatives from Stop & Shop previously opposed the city's ban and said it would cost the store some $120,000 more per year because of the increased cost for paper bags. They opposed being forced to switch out 3.3 million plastic bags per year for the more expensive paper bags.
 
Most of the grocery stores in Berkshire County operate in towns with a ban in place, however, there are a few left in Pittsfield. That could change by the fall if the full City Council approves the ordinance. 
 
"I just want something passed," Del Gallo said of the lengthy six-year road to get to that point.

Tags: bag ban,   ordinance & rules ,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield CPA Committee Funds Half of FY24 Requests

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A few projects are not getting funded by the Community Preservation Committee because of a tight budget.

The projects not making the cut were in the historic preservation and open space and recreation categories and though they were seen as interesting and valuable projects, the urgency was not prevalent enough for this cycle.

"It's a tough year," Chair Danielle Steinmann said.

The panel made its recommendations on Monday after several meetings of presentations from applications. They will advance to the City Council for final approval.  

Two cemetery projects were scored low by the committee and not funded: A $9,500 request from the city for fencing at the West Part Cemetery as outlined in a preservation plan created in 2021 and a $39,500 request from the St. Joseph Cemetery Commission for tombstone restorations.

"I feel personally that they could be pushed back a year," Elizabeth Herland said. "And I think they're both good projects but they don't have the urgency."

It was also decided that George B. Crane Memorial Center's $73,465 application for the creation of a recreational space would not be funded. Herland said the main reason she scored the project low was because it didn't appear to benefit the larger community as much as other projects do.

There was conversation about not funding The Christian Center's $34,100 request for heating system repairs but the committee ended up voting to give it $21,341 when monies were left over.

The total funding request was more than $1.6 million for FY24 and with a budget of $808,547, only about half could be funded. The panel allocated all of the available monies, breaking down into $107,206 for open space and recreation, $276,341 for historic preservation, and $425,000 for community housing.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories