@theMarket: Trick or Treat?

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
The markets had pulled back about 5 percent by Thursday. Technically, stocks were oversold; we were due for a bounce. "Buy the dip" was on everyone's lips and then on Thursday morning, GDP for the third quarter came in at 3.5 percent — an upside surprise. Stocks exploded. Sounds easy, right? Think again.

Friday the markets took it all back and then some.

"What happened?" asked a client, who returned from lunch in South County and was totally baffled by Friday's sell-off, "we wait for good news on the economy for months. We get it and bam, the market sells off."

Go figure.

In last week's column, "Sell on the News," I explained that markets tend to discount news announcements before they happen and sell when the event occurs. This week we had a belated bout of this same kind of selling on Friday.

Now, there is no question that 3.5 percent growth in the economy, after four straight quarters of declines, was great news, but at least 3.3 percent of that growth was anticipated and priced into the markets. Maybe the extra .02 percent in growth represented an upside surprise, which could account for the 2 percent plus move in the averages on Thursday but by Friday investors were ready to sell.

I'm sure the market pundits will try to explain this behavior by telling you that a rising dollar was the culprit (maybe) or that consumer sentiment numbers fell in October (true) or that Goldman Sachs is forecasting that Santa Claus has H1N1 (a scurrilous rumor). Forget that stuff. The markets have been dominated by traders since the beginning of this rally.

If you doubt that, just look at the anemic volume over the last eight months. Traders tend to rely less on fundamentals like GDP numbers, earnings and the like and more on momentum and technical indicators. They saw a big move up on low volume and decided it was time to take profits. Like it or not, that is the kind of markets we are dealing with today.

So are we facing the long-awaited 10-15 percent correction everyone has been predicting and waiting for? The bears say yes and argue that 1) the S&P 500 Index has broken technical support at the 200-day moving average at 1042. I have written about the importance of the 200 DMA in past columns but don't worry — all you need to know is breaking support is a bad sign. 2) Volume also seems to pick up whenever the markets decline and taper off when they move up, another ill omen. It means there is less conviction among investors as the markets move higher. And less and less stocks and sectors are participating in the upside. Finally, bears say we are long overdue for this kind of correction because stocks, bonds and commodities are all overvalued.

However, before we weep for the ghosts of profits lost, lets look at the plus side. We have had bigger pullbacks then this since March. In fact, one was almost 7 percent. As of Friday, the S& P is down almost 6 percent from its intraday high of 1101 reached on Oct. 21. So we could just as easily turn around early next week and regain these losses. Bulls so far have been right. Every time the markets have dipped since March, it has been a buying opportunity. 

I do think this pullback is another opportunity to buy stocks. I'm just not sure if I should buy them here. So I am going to take a cautious route and wait for evidence of further downside before committing capital.

Bill Schmick is registered as an investment adviser representative and portfolio manager with Berkshire Money Management (BMM), managing more than $200 million for investors in the Berkshires. Bill’s forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of BMM. None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-888-232-6072 (toll free) or e-mail him at wschmick@fairpoint.net Visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill’s insights.

You can also tune in to Bill's "@theMarket" show on Vox radio every Friday morning at 8:35, 9:35 and 11:05 or on WBRK at 4:05 every weekday afternoon.

Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of BMM or a solicitation to become a client of BMM. The reader should not assume that any strategies, or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold or held by BMM.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Town Meeting to Vote Budget, Bylaws & Vehicle Purchases

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Tuesday's annual town meeting includes a $14 million operating budget, new short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units and sign bylaws, and free cash article appropriations.

Voters will gather at Lanesborough Elementary School on June 9 at 6 p.m. to decide on 20 warrant articles.

The fiscal 2027 budget is up a little over 10 percent. Some of the main increases are the Mount Greylock Regional School District and McCann Technical School: the McCann assessment is up more than 30 percent based on factors including enrollment and the school renovation project, and Mount Greylock's is up 11 percent.

Article 11 is for the town to vote to approve from free cash the sum of $16,298.48 for the McCann Technical School roof and window replacement project so as not to impact the budget. Article 3 is  appropriate $7,586,284 for Mount Greylock Regional School assessment.

Another notable increase was in life and health insurance, showing an increase of about 26 percent.

Ambulance Director Jen Weber is planning 24-hour coverage, which means more staff and a hike in her budget. One of the articles asks the town to appropriate $234,100 to operate the Ambulance Enterprise Fund for salaries and expenses.

Many town departments are looking for new vehicles. The Fire Department is looking to replace its outdated 1996 fire engine. There are two articles related to the truck at a total of $813,366. Article 12 would transfer $225,000 from free cash into the Fire Truck Stabilization Fund; Article 13 would transfer $605,000 from the fund and authorize the borrowing of $208,366.08.

The total includes a $100,000 contingency cost to cover any additional costs if a 2026 model-year chassis cannot be secured before new emissions standards go into effect in 2027.

The board at its last meeting moved the $225,000 transfer to come before the borrowing article, changing the stabilization number. If the $225,000 is not voted on, then they will amend the next article's number on the floor, subtracting the $225,000. This shows the borrowing number significantly lower.

Article 17 asks for the transfer of $80,000 from free cash to replace a police cruiser.

Police Chief Rob Derksen's aim is to replace one vehicle every other year, meaning the oldest vehicle gets replaced about every 10 years. 

He stressed that if delayed this year, the town may have to double up in a future year to get back on schedule, and that paying later usually costs more. The article will ask for $80,000 from free cash, the vehicles used to be funded by the BHRD.

Lastly, the Highway Department is looking to replace a 2014 International dump truck that will be a total of $330,000 and will take two to three years to receive.

Money will be used from last year's approval of $250,000 from free cash for the replacement of a 2012 highway front-end loader that was underspent $49,261. Town meeting is being asked to approve  a transfer of $53,274.85 from free cash and the use of $227,464 from funds from the Sale of Town Real Estate to fund the balance.

Other free cash proposals include $1,200 to purchase software to support tracking and ongoing maintenance schedules of town-owned vehicles; $42,000 for the replacement of the Highway Department's storage shed roof, $200,000 to reduce the tax levy.

View Full Story

More Stories