image description
More than a half-dozen neighbors testified against dogs owned by Chestnut Street resident Donna Mason claiming the dogs are often off-leashes, barking excessively and threatening the neighbors.

Williamstown Exiles Three Unruly Dogs

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Maggie Adler said the dogs broke into her home and killed her cat.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Three pooches were exiled from the Village Beautiful on Monday night.

The Board of Selectmen heard hours of testimony from neighbors who said three dogs owned by Donna Mason of Chestnut Street are a nuisance and ordered that the dogs be removed from town within 30 days.

"It's not just the incidents that have been testified about tonight," Selectmen Chairman Thomas Sheldon said. "We also have an extensive written record over six years."

The town has compiled more than 100 pages of complaints and testimony against the dogs for being off leash, excessive barking and being vicious.

The last straw came on July 4 when two of the dogs broke through a screen door and into neighbor Margaret "Maggie" Adler's house. The dogs caused more than $10,000 in damages and killed a pet cat while Adler was out of town.

"I don't exactly feel comfortable in my own house anymore," Adler told the board."There was significant damage to my home as well as the loss of a cat."

Adler said her home was filled with urine and feces — including on her carpets and her bed — and massive property damage. More than $10,000 was spent on professional cleaners, repairs and new items, which was paid by her homeowners insurance, she said.

Mason admitted it was her dogs that caused the damage and killed the cat but said it was a one-time occurrence because the dogs had gotten away from her during a walk. The dogs had run away while still on a leash; Mason said she was searching for them for two days.

"Yes, he got away from me. I'm not as strong as I used to be," Mason said. "I feel really bad."

But despite Mason's insistence that it was an isolated incident, multiple neighbors testified that the dogs have been a nuisance for a long time. Ellen Bayliss recalled two incidents in which the dogs had chased her family members. On July 30, one of Mason's five dogs chased Bayliss' son while he was riding a bicycle down the street and the next day her daughter-in-law was chased while jogging.

"I'm never sure if they are safe," neighbor Sarah Madden said. "It's terrifying."

Neighbor Tony Menkal said his son and daughter were also chased by the dogs. All of the complainants, about seven neighbors, said the dogs are often roaming the streets freely.

"They didn't get bitten but they were scared," Menkal said. "They were really, really scared. It has gotten out of hand."



Donna Mason showed the Selectmen the thick leash that her dog was restrained with before he pulled away from her.
Mason contended that some of the complaints were about dogs that she no longer owns and that the five dogs she currently owns are not nuisances. She has owned a total of 17 different dogs.

Chuck, the dog that had killed the cat, has never had an incident nor had ever been off the property without being leashed before, she said. Another dog, Fooey, sometimes runs off the property but is gentle, she said.

"None of my dogs have ever bit anyone," Mason said. "Chucky has never been loose. He has never been an issue."

The board, however, said the description of each dog and the compiled reports from the animal control officer that cites the dogs by name was enough proof that three of the dogs were public nuisances.

"It's so far beyond reasonable that we have no choice," Selectman Thomas Costley said.

Mason will now have 30 days to find a new home for the pitbull Chucky, a mixed-breed pug Fooey and Princess, a mixed-breed shepherd. She will also have to report to the board about the relocation.

The decision was a blow to Mason, who emotionally responded to each allegation in defense of her dogs and left before the final decision but after each board member voiced favor of removing the dogs.

"My dogs are like my kids," Mason pleaded.







Tags: dogs,   domestic animals,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories