image description
Councilors Donna Todd Rivers and Peter White both supported the petition.

Pittsfield Council Asks Mayor For Independent Review of Budgets

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Councilors Anthony Simonelli, Lisa Tully and Nicholas Caccamo.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council asked former Mayor Daniel Bianchi a little over a year ago to bring in an outside consultant to review the city budget to look for reductions.

That didn't happen.

Now the council is hoping new Mayor Linda Tyer will do so.
 
"I see a lot of departments working as a silo. Our taxes have increased and they will again. I think we need to do our due-diligence and look at all of the city budgets," said Councilor at-Large Kathleen Amuso, who filed a petition asking the mayor hire a Six Sigma or a Lean consultant.
 
"Are there things we are duplicating on the city side and on the school side? I think there are savings out there if we focus."
 
Lean and Six Sigma are both data-driven processes aimed for businesses to streamline systems, reduce waste, eliminate duplication, and review purchasing while improving customer service.
 
Amuso says bringing in an outside consultant to review the city's operations through one of the processes could yield plenty of long-term savings. 
 
"We need to look at all kinds of ways to consolidate and get the best bang for our buck out there," said Ward 2 Councilor Kevin Morandi.
 
Ward 4 Councilor Christopher Connell says he agrees with the concept, but doesn't know if the city should pay for a consultant. Ward 5 Councilor Donna Todd Rivers suggested creating a task force of residents to handle the reviews. 
 
"I do believe there needs to be an independent review of the budget," Rivers said, adding that there are people in the community with experience in the two types of processes. She said a "well-appointed and thought-out task force should be able to do this."
 
Councilor at Large Peter White supported asking the mayor to do cost analyses of city departments to make sure the city isn't spending more on a consultant than the amount of savings found. Further, he added that while there could be some savings by changing vendors for products, the city should still buy locally to support businesses operating here. 
 
The council sent the petition to Tyer's office with a unanimous vote. The petition is the same one that went to Bianchi in December 2014. 
 
In other business, the City Council accepted a number of grants including $350,000 for the Pittsfield Community Connection program, $95,000 for the senior center, $9,000 traffic enforcement, $4,980 for bicycle and pedestrian safety, $3,500 for trees at Wellesley Park. 
 
The council was unsupportive of a motion from Amuso to start meetings at 6:30 instead of 7 p.m. and to allow subcommittees the ability to change start times on occasion. 
 
"People want to get in here, do their business, and get home to their families," Amuso said of starting the meetings earlier.
 
In some cases, subcommittee member schedules could conflict and she asked for the ability to hold meetings at times other than 7 p.m. That, too, was rejected by the council, with many members saying it would through a monkey wrench into scheduling access to meeting rooms.
 
"It creates too much of a nightmare to start scheduling around other meetings," White said.
 
Others said in the rare occasion a special meeting is needed, the ability to change times could make the subcommittees more efficient in operations. But the motion failed 6-5 with White, Morandi, Melissa Mazzeo, Lisa Tully, and Nicholas Caccamo voting against the flexibility. 

Tags: cost savings,   financial consultant,   financial planning,   fiscal 2017,   Pittsfield city council ,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Rejects 5-Minute Public Comments

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Public comment will remain limited to three minutes.

The City Council on Tuesday rejected Daniel Miraglia's request to change the open-mic public comment period at council meetings from three to five minutes when 20 or fewer speakers sign up.

It failed 0-8, with two councilors absent and one who left before the vote. The councilors urged constituents to contact them instead so that matters could be dealt with outside of the podium in council chambers, where conversation is one-sided.

"I think it's a much better way to communicate with us through a phone call or an email or even if you see us out somewhere to talk about an issue on a deeper level than just the three minutes at open mic, or even if it were five," Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi said.

"There's a lot of supporting information that is often missed in those discussions, one-sided discussions, and for me, I just, I can't support it."

Councilor at Large Alisa Costa was glad Miraglia brought the petition forward because it is a healthy discussion when thinking about engaging with residents. Still, she didn't believe it was the correct path forward.

"Sometimes it's easier to get us all at once here but that's not a discussion. You're making a declaration there and we're not even allowed to respond in the middle of that and have any kind of discussion about it so it's not really helpful to lengthen it," she said.

"If you want to impact my decision or share information with me, I encourage you to reach out to me. Mr. Miraglia did not do that on this issue either. So if we're going to have a discussion and debate that's how we can have it and there's less pressure. You're not up in front of a mic and on TV. So I really hope we continue to think about how we can make open mic better or how we can engage residents better in government but I don't think that's the way to do it."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories