Letter: Gardner Saddened by Failure to Reach Waubeeka Compromise

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I was saddened that the Williamstown Planning Board, of which I am a member, could not reach consensus on the language for a commercial overlay district at Waubeeka Golf Links at the May 4 meeting.

I am further saddened that Mr. Deep's attorney has indicated that he will not accept the amendment I drafted because it places a square-footage limit on the development. The amendment borrowed from multiple iterations from the last several weeks but it was met with hostility from two fellow board members and it was labeled as a crushing blow to economic development.

This is unfortunate because the Planning Board has worked for nine months to accommodate the development of a country inn and resort at Waubeeka, and I had hoped that we could reach a consensus that all of us could support on the floor of town meeting. After the meeting I was accused by one of our local reporters of having a secret agenda to kill development at Waubeeka. Nothing could be further from the truth. I had hoped we could arrive at a total square footage for the development that would satisfy both Mike Deep's development needs as well as the concerns of Williamstown citizens who oppose development of uncertain scale.

This has been a painful debate — I believe in careful planning — and I support an inn and resort at Waubeeka. But I want to know the scale.

Sarah Gardner
Gardner is a member of the
Williamstown, Mass., Planning Board

 

 

 


Tags: waubeeka,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories