Letter: Support Sarah Gardner for Williamstown Planning Board

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Last fall, the select board and the Planning Board jointly appointed Sarah Gardner to the vacant seat on the Planning Board, electing her from among a slate of strong candidates. I voted for Gardner then without hesitation, and I will do so again on Tuesday, when she goes up against another accomplished candidate for a five-year seat on the board.

Sarah Gardner stands out due to her in-depth knowledge and hands-on experience with planning, making her an invaluable asset to the board as it works toward ensuring our town’s vitality now and into the future. Her vision combines a desire for economic growth with a sensitivity to the distinctive, rural quality of our community. Gardner has demonstrated her willingness to balance a diversity of perspectives, most recently in her role as latecomer to the Waubeeka issue, which has been before the board since September.

Contrary to the accusations of some, she has worked to find compromise, believing that a well-planned development at Waubeeka golf course would be in the best interests of the town. She has striven to delineate a zoning change that would hew to the town’s goals under our Master Plan and recent EDC report, while also enabling a careful development to move forward at the site.

We rely on the Planning Board to judiciously serve the interests of the town in the near and distant future, through reasoned planning that supports smart growth. It is a balancing act where no single cause or player can call all the shots. As an example of the insight Sarah brings to the board is her recent suggestion that the town form an Economic Development Board whose role would be to actively recruit businesses that fit our existing human resources and building stock.

Sarah Gardner is ideally qualified to carry forward in her work on the board, and she deserves our vote.

Anne O'Connor
O'Connor is a member of the Williamstown Board of Selectmen.

 

 


Tags: election 2016,   endorsement,   town elections,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Affordable Housing Trust Hears Objections to Summer Street Proposal

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Neighbors concerned about a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week raised the specter of a lawsuit against the town and/or Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity.
 
"If I'm not mistaken, I think this is kind of a new thing for Williamstown, an affordable housing subdivision of this size that's plunked down in the middle, or the midst of houses in a mature neighborhood," Summer Street resident Christopher Bolton told the Affordable Housing Trust board, reading from a prepared statement, last Wednesday. "I think all of us, the Trust, Habitat, the community, have a vested interest in giving this project the best chance of success that it can have. We all remember subdivisions that have been blocked by neighbors who have become frustrated with the developers and resorted to adversarial legal processes.
 
"But most of us in the neighborhood would welcome this at the right scale if the Trust and Northern Berkshire Habitat would communicate with us and compromise with us and try to address some of our concerns."
 
Bolton and other residents of the neighborhood were invited to speak to the board of the trust, which in 2015 purchased the Summer Street lot along with a parcel at the corner of Cole Avenue and Maple Street with the intent of developing new affordable housing on the vacant lots.
 
Currently, Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity, which built two homes at the Cole/Maple property, is developing plans to build up to five single-family homes on the 1.75-acre Summer Street lot. Earlier this month, many of the same would-be neighbors raised objections to the scale of the proposed subdivision and its impact on the neighborhood in front of the Planning Board.
 
The Affordable Housing Trust board heard many of the same arguments at its meeting. It also heard from some voices not heard at the Planning Board session.
 
And the trustees agreed that the developer needs to engage in a three-way conversation with the abutters and the trust, which still owns the land, to develop a plan that is more acceptable to all parties.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories