Letter: Negative Campaigning Is Not a Treat

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Last week, in Williamstown and surrounding areas, Halloween became political.

When one of the authors of this letter went to a friend's party after trick-or-treating, he found a pack of M&Ms in his candy bag with a little note that stated: "Hillary for Prison 2016." It was outrageous. Halloween is for kids, not for campaigning. We feel that expressing your views about the election through children is inappropriate; if you want to express your feelings you should find a more reasonable way. The person was irresponsible when they did that.

The next day, in our fifth-grade class, we learned we weren't the only ones to get this "treat." There was a range of feelings. A few were unbothered by the note; many others were offended and some even felt that the statement is predatory. If our younger siblings got this message, they would feel terrified and scared. They might even cry. One of our friends got this note and he felt indignant and bewildered.

Hillary wasn't the only target of negative campaigning.

We heard of another house in our county that had a spinning wheel that decided what kind of candy you got. If you landed on Trump, you got Dum-Dums. If you landed on Clinton, you got Smarties. In school, we work hard to end bullying. Yes, Dum-Dums are candy, but it is essentially calling Trump dumb and Clinton smart. This is a great example of what we are trying to stop.



Both of these "treats" are bad role models for kids. They show us that you don't need to take responsibility for your actions or your political views. The people behind these acts are not articulating their political views in a productive way. They are using kids as tools in their campaign.

This is NOT OK.

Signed,
 

Concerned 5th graders
Williamstown, Mass.
 

We have been informed that this letter was composed by a group of fifth-graders who worked hard and used a thesaurus to make their point heard. We applaud their efforts. 

 

 


Tags: election 2016,   letters to the editor,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Summer Street Residents Make Case to Williamstown Planning Board

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Neighbors of a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week asked the Planning Board to take a critical look at the project, which the residents say is out of scale to the neighborhood.
 
Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity was at Town Hall last Tuesday to present to the planners a preliminary plan to build five houses on a 1.75 acre lot currently owned by town's Affordable Housing Trust.
 
The subdivision includes the construction of a road from Summer Street onto the property to provide access to five new building lots of about a quarter-acre apiece.
 
Several residents addressed the board from the floor of the meeting to share their objections to the proposed subdivision.
 
"I support the mission of Habitat," Summer Street resident Christopher Bolton told the board. "There's been a lot of concern in the neighborhood. We had a neighborhood meeting [Monday] night, and about half the houses were represented.
 
"I'm impressed with the generosity of my neighbors wanting to contribute to help with the housing crisis in the town and enthusiastic about a Habitat house on that property or maybe two or even three, if that's the plan. … What I've heard is a lot of concern in the neighborhood about the scale of the development, that in a very small neighborhood of 23 houses, five houses, close together on a plot like this will change the character of the neighborhood dramatically."
 
Last week's presentation from NBHFH was just the beginning of a process that ultimately would include a definitive subdivision plan for an up or down vote from the board.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories