WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Educators in the newly expanded Mount Greylock Regional School District are taking their contract grievances to the state, saying school officials have been negotiating in bad faith.
Teachers in the Lanesborough and Williamstown elementary schools and at Mount Greylock Regional School have filed a series of unfair labor practice complaints with the state Department of Labor Relations, according to a statement released on Monday.
A group representing the three former bargaining committees — one for each school — started negotiating a unified contract with the newly formed preK-12 school district in January. The Transition Committee, temporarily in charge until a new school committee for the expanded district can be elected, hoped to get that done by July but negotiations are still under way.
The teachers say their salaries have been unjustly frozen and have asked that the prior contractual increases and other provisions be honored since a new contract is not in force. That would be in line with past practice, according to the Lanesborough and Williamstown education associations and Mount Greylock Educators Association.
The teachers' unions went public with their complaints last month. The negotiations are headed for mediation and the three current contracts are set to expire over the next two years, with Williamstown Elementary coming up first at the end of this August.
Transition Committee Chairman Joe Bergeron declined to comment on Monday afternoon.
Bergeron said his committee decided during an executive session on June 14 not to issue a response to the union's initial public airing of the grievance. And the committee likewise did not vote to authorize Bergeron or a member of its negotiation subcommittee to speak publicly on behalf of the district.
The three associations also accuse the committee of trying to "run the clock out" with its refusal to respond to 36 proposals regarding the new unified contract before the committee's self-imposed July 1 deadline.
The three associations say they fully support the regionalizing effort but maintain that the window for negotiating and ratifying a new unified contract was unrealistic.
The Transition Committee has a meeting scheduled for Wednesday afternoon, but Bergeron learned of the union's latest press release on Monday too late to call an executive session for the July 18 meeting where the committee could deliberate on a public response.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Summer Street Residents Make Case to Williamstown Planning Board
By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Neighbors of a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week asked the Planning Board to take a critical look at the project, which the residents say is out of scale to the neighborhood.
Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity was at Town Hall last Tuesday to present to the planners a preliminary plan to build five houses on a 1.75 acre lot currently owned by town's Affordable Housing Trust.
The subdivision includes the construction of a road from Summer Street onto the property to provide access to five new building lots of about a quarter-acre apiece.
Several residents addressed the board from the floor of the meeting to share their objections to the proposed subdivision.
"I support the mission of Habitat," Summer Street resident Christopher Bolton told the board. "There's been a lot of concern in the neighborhood. We had a neighborhood meeting [Monday] night, and about half the houses were represented.
"I'm impressed with the generosity of my neighbors wanting to contribute to help with the housing crisis in the town and enthusiastic about a Habitat house on that property or maybe two or even three, if that's the plan. … What I've heard is a lot of concern in the neighborhood about the scale of the development, that in a very small neighborhood of 23 houses, five houses, close together on a plot like this will change the character of the neighborhood dramatically."
Last week's presentation from NBHFH was just the beginning of a process that ultimately would include a definitive subdivision plan for an up or down vote from the board.
Neighbors of a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week asked the Planning Board to take a critical look at the project, which the residents say is out of scale to the neighborhood. click for more
The Select Board and Planning Board this week clashed over a proposal that would add to the town charter a mechanism to ensure compliance with the foundation of town government. click for more
The Select Board has agreed to remove the town flag a year after town meeting established a bylaw restricting the use of flags on public property.
click for more
Drainage was the chief concern of the residents who turned out for Wednesday's informational meeting about a planned five-home development off Summer Street. click for more