STOCKBRIDGE, Mass. — The buzz after Tuesday afternoon's district attorney debate centers on a last-second comment from candidate Judith Knight.
"Andrea, you have so little experience that you don't even know what you don't know," Knight said in her closing remarks.
Andrea Harrington attempted to chime in, objecting to Knight's statement. The two talked over each other as Harrington claimed Knight's comment was a "misrepresentation" of her experience and that she wouldn't stand for it, as Knight continued on. WAMC News Director Ian Pickus put a halt to Harrington's rebuttal and brought the debate to a close.
That was the second time during the hourlong debate that Knight, a former prosecutor, had taken a hard swipe at defense attorney Harrington, and the second time Pickus refused Harrington a chance for rebuttal. When discussing the role of politics in the district attorney's office, Knight hinted that Harrington was not ready when she said the office "needs an adult" in charge.
The attacks played well for incumbent Paul Caccaviello, who got to be the good cop to Knight's bad cop. He kept his message fairly free of attacks, though he did sneak in a jab or two about Harrington's experience as well. The longtime prosecutor claimed Harrington has only litigated eight trials in an attempt to show a contrast in experience.
As the primary election is just a week away, he has intensely focused on pushing his experience in the office.
"That is what my campaign is based on, experience, over 5,000 cases, over 15 murder cases," said Caccaviello, who's spent nearly 30 years in the Berkshire district attorney's office.
While Harrington found herself on the receiving end of attacks, she didn't hold back on her criticism of Caccaviello. She said the office failed under former District Attorney David Capeless, who handpicked Caccaviello as his successor in March, to embrace concepts of a drug court and diversion programs, had focused too much time on "low-level" drug cases and hadn't put in resources to address sexual assault cases.
Because of that, Berkshire County is getting hit harder than elsewhere by public safety issues, she said.
"They really have continued to wage the failed war on drugs," Harrington said.
Harrington has cast herself as the reformer. She has consistently refuted claims of inexperience by citing 15 years as an attorney -- from death-row appeals to civil cases to criminal defense. She said she brings a different experience than Caccaviello -- and many of the attorneys in the office -- who have been solely local prosecutors.
"We get people who are in an office for a long time. It can create calcification. I think that is what we are seeing in criminal justice in Berkshire County," Harrington said.
That is something Knight agrees with.
Knight again cited the decade-old Great Barrington case of young men who were arrested on drug charges, many of them teenagers. She said all of them were brought up on serious charges despite many of sales being for marijuana. She said the community had called on Capeless not to use the mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana sales in a school zone but that Capeless "dug in his heels."
Those weren't handled on a case-by-case basis, she said, as Caccaviello has routinely said he'd do, but lumped into the same court to go after all of them.
"It has been a dark time under former district attorney Capeless," Knight said. "He would not take in information from other people as to how things could be different."
Caccaviello refuted that claim, saying 10 of the 12 individuals charged with just marijuana had the charges dismissed. He said the other cases involved cocaine, heroin, and ketamine -- not just marijuana in a school zone. He further said that the entire investigation was launched at the request of the community.
Caccaviello called Capeless' 14 years in office as "principled and unafraid."
A similar alignment of the candidates was had on a question relating to illegal firearms. Knight and Harrington both went after Caccaviello's record saying the office hadn't handled those cases aggressively enough.
"I have seen this district attorney's office drop gun charges rather than drop drug charges," Knight said. "I think the guns are much more dangerous than drugs."
Harrington said it is the job of the district attorney's office to enforce strict gun laws and her office would be much more serious about it -- particularly when it comes to safe storage.
Caccaviello, however, said not all gun charges are equal. He said sometimes the violation is just paperwork. He doesn't believe that is a jailable offense and that it can be handled with community service, probation, or a fine. He said there are times the office has to drop gun cases because it is a case it can't win.
But when there are serious firearm charges, Caccaviello said the offenders are "diligently prosecuted."
When it comes to politics, Harrington found herself the odd person out. She sees politics as a way to bring change and she feels it is important for Democrats to win races all over the ballot.
But despite competing for a political party nomination, Knight and Caccaviello said there is no room for politics in the district attorney's office.
"It has to be absolutely free of the political noise, local politics, and the bigger picture. It is about doing what is right for this county and being neutral and objective," Knight said.
Caccaviello said when a case needs to be handled, politics shouldn't play any role in it. He said politics is an "ill fit" for the office.
Harrington, however, also took a swipe at Caccaviello saying politics are already in the office as shown when Capeless resigned early and worked behind the scenes to get the governor's office to appoint Caccaviello, thus giving him the advantage of incumbency prior to the election.
Overall, Tuesday's debate revealed little new about the candidates who will compete for the Democratic nomination on Tuesday, an election that will essentially determine the new district attorney. The majority of the topics discussed had been asked during previous debates and the candidates stood firm in the positions they've taken throughout the campaign.
Caccaviello has positioned himself as the most experienced prosecutor. Harrington is the candidate positioning herself to bring change to an ineffective office through her diverse set of experiences and vision for new ideas. Knight is finding a niche in the middle, leaning on five years of experience as a prosecutor and 25 years as a defense attorney as the one to bring progressive ideas to the office.
If you want things to change, you need something different. That's Andrea Harrington's view when it comes to reforming the criminal justice system. And now, she wants to be that change. She is seeking election as the next district attorney following the retirement of David Capeless.
For Paul Caccaviello, the district attorney's job is a call to service. After 14 years as the first assistant district attorney, Caccaviello is looking to fill the shoes being left by David Capeless, who retired. With some 30 years as a prosecutor, Caccaviello said he has the most experience and qualifications to take over the office.
Judith Knight isn't a natural politician. She's an attorney. She's a defense attorney who has spent years on the other side of a courtroom from a district attorney's office that operated in a way that she doesn't think is for the best. Back in 2006, her frustration boiled over when she watched the district attorney's office prosecute a teenager over minor drug charges and she launched a campaign to take over the office.
Andrea Harrington said some 95 percent of criminal cases end with plea deals crafted behind closed doors. When one person gets probation after being caught with pounds of marijuana and guns, while another person is given a two-year mandatory minimum sentence for selling a joint worth of marijuana, it certainly gives people pause. They wonder, is the justice system fair?
Judith Knight says she has "shown you what I am." On Wednesday night, the candidate for district attorney boasted of some 30 years of work in the community. She stood as a defense attorney up for teenagers for whom she believed were inappropriately getting the book thrown at them from former District Attorney David Capeless for selling marijuana.
The aspirants for Berkshire district attorney fielded some two dozen questions and were given only a minute each to respond. There was no debate between the candidates but Caccaviello, the incumbent, and challenger Harrington had a few sharp words.torium on the Williams College campus. The public is invited to attend and participate.
Paul Caccaviello had a domestic homicide case while working in the district attorney's office and he said he brought in behavioral experts to help teach and understand the issues of domestic abuse. He said he's taken steps to create a sub-unit to focus directly on domestic abuse cases and to understand the best ways to become proactive in domestic abuse cases to halt things from getting worse. And that's what he says he'll do if elected as the new district attorney this fall.
Paul Caccaviello, Andrea Harrington and Judith Knight are vying for the nomination that will essentially determine the winner in the race since there is no other candidate on the general election ballot.
District Attorney Candidates Paul Caccaviello and Andrea Harrington have taken aim at each other over the last few weeks. Caccaviello first challenged Harrington's fitness for office, saying she doesn't have the "basic qualifications" needed.
Back on May 11, the owner of Otto's took to Facebook in criticizing the way the district attorney got the job. David Capeless in March stepped down from the position early after working for months with the governor's office to get Paul Caccaviello appointed to the job. Capeless made no bones about it saying, "I am taking this step now because I want Paul to run for election as the district attorney as I did 14 years ago."
Andrea Harrington says the "status quo" in the district attorney's office is not working for Berkshire County. "It is time to have a district attorney with integrity and who is accountable to this community," Harrington said
Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com
Narcan: A HOPE to Save Lives
By Rep. William "Smitty" PignatelliGuest Column
At the tail end of last year, I heard a story about a young man who had passed away of an opioid overdose. This story hit many nerves for me, in particular, because it involved a first responder who arrived on the scene while the young man was still alive, but was unable to take action to save his life because he was not carrying an opioid antagonist.
Opioid antagonists work by blocking receptors in the brain interacting with opioids causing the overdose and preventing the body from responding to them. The most common and easily accessible antagonist at this time is naloxone, usually referred to by its brand name, Narcan. We know that Narcan works and we credit it with saving hundreds of Massachusetts lives a year.
In fact, Massachusetts issued a Narcan standing order for all pharmacies across the state through last year's CARE Act, allowing it to be readily available to anyone who has a need for it; we as a state created the Department of Public Health's Overdoes Education and Naloxone Distribution Program (OEND) to better understand how to make the medicine more easily accessible; and we created the Municipal Naloxone Bulk Purchase Trust Fund (BPTF) through legislation in 2015 to help make the substance more affordable for communities to provide to their first responders.
For these reasons and more, I was floored to learn that first responders in Massachusetts are not required to carry Narcan on their persons or in their vehicles while they are on duty. Knowing full well that we are in the midst of an opioid epidemic that is gripping the entire nation, knowing that any call coming in through an emergency line could be reporting an overdose situation, and realizing that the lack of an opioid antagonist by the responder who was the first professional to arrive on the scene is why that young man is not here with us today all prompted me to take legislative action on this dire issue. After months of research and discussion with public safety officers, legislators, healthcare advocates and providers, my office introduced H.1747, An Act helping overdosing persons in emergencies, otherwise known as the HOPE Act.
Madison Ross took home a gold medal and two second-place finishes, and her Mount Greylock teammates won the mile relay to close the meet as the Mounties placed second at the Central/Western Massachusetts Division 2 Championships at Westfield State University. click for more