The Board of Health upheld its order to demolish on a property owned by Raymond Supranowicz on John Street. The property has been in code enforcement for years.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Board of Health upheld both a demolition order on a multi-unit building on John Street and a suspension of Thing or Two's tobacco license.
Thing or Two Variety on Francis Avenue will have its tobacco licenses suspended for seven days following a number of violations.
Health Director Gina Armstrong said on May 10, inspectors from the Tri-Town Health Department found flavored tobacco products in stock. Such products were banned dating back to sweeping new tobacco regulations crafted in 2014.
Armstrong said that fine still hasn't been paid. On Aug. 2, Tri-Town Health performed a second inspection to ensure compliance and found three more violations -- state and city licenses were not properly displayed, signage required by the state Department of Public Health was not displayed, and the clerk sold products to two customers without verifying age.
That is the second violation within a 24-month period, which calls for an additional $350 fine and a seven-day suspension. Armstrong said that in total, owner Saurin Shah owes $700 in fines and he had called to establish a payment plan and then missed the first payment.
Shah recognized he "messed up" when it came to hanging the license. He said all of his licenses had been paid in full but just never got around to printing them out from the online permitting program.
"I just forgot to print them and put them on the wall," Shah said.
He contested the allegation that he was selling flavored products and said the inspector found an unopened package of flavored cigars under the register that he was sending back to the vendor, adding that he doesn't sell in any of the three stores he manages. To the sales of tobacco allegation, he said he terminated the employee who sold tobacco without asking the customers for identification.
Armstrong, however, said it had been nearly a month since the citation for not displaying the licenses and the Department of Public Health required signage and when inspectors were there on Tuesday, they still weren't displayed. Shah said he did it last night after the inspectors had left.
"There is an apparent disregard for the requirements of the Board of Health to maintain a tobacco sales permit," Armstrong said.
Shah recognized where he had gone wrong on some of the violations and said he'd correct it. He said he'd pay the fines but he asked that the board overturn the suspension. He cited his record of managing multiple stores in the city for years without much for violations - though Armstrong contended there had been violations at other stores in the past.
"I messed up and I hope not to have a suspension for it," Shah said.
Shah added that during a suspension not only will he lose money but, being a neighborhood store, his customers' needs would be affected.
Board of Health member Alan Kulberg responded that his customer's convenience isn't the board's concern -- public health is. And Kulberg hasn't seen a strong effort to comply with the city's tobacco requirements aimed to ensure public health.
"You have not shown good faith. There is a repeated pattern of disregard for the code," Kulberg said.
In other business, the board upheld its order to tear down a blighted property on John Street.
In June, the board issued an order that the building at 49-55 John St. be razed. The owner would either have to pay for it or the city would and bill the owner and place a lien on the property. Owner Raymond Supranowicz asked for another six months to find a buyer.
"I stopped working on it because it was broken into and they stole all of the copper," Supranowicz said, adding that he is hoping for somebody to purchase it and rehab it.
He said the roof is nine years old and that there have been some leads on potential purchasers. Code Enforcement Inspector Mark Blaisdell, however, said the property has been in code enforcement since 2016 and has been in disrepair for years before that.
He said the property doesn't have proper lighting at night or security to keep people out of it, there is a lack of utilities, and fire alarms are not connected to alert the Fire Department. It has sat vacant for a number of years and has substantial structural issues.
Armstrong added that she had spoken with Supranowicz when he contacted the city asking for an appeal and stressed the importance of at least maintaining the exterior. She said as of Tuesday, even the lawn hadn't been mowed.
"During this period of time there has been no maintenance on the property," Blaisdell said. "This house has been dilapidated and a blight to the neighborhood."
Supranowicz contested that he had hired somebody to take care of the exterior but it either hadn't been done well enough or at all.
"I hired a kid to do this stuff and I get a bill and it is not done," he said of the exterior maintenance.
Supranowicz had also missed two prior appeal hearings the Board of Health scheduled since the June 6 order. Supranowicz said he was out of town dealing with family issues much of the year and was unable to make it to those two hearings.
"Nobody is looking at this property saying 'I want this property,'" Blaisdell said, pointing out that the leads for a sale Supranowicz presented were places the city referred him to.
The Board of Health felt Blaisdell had long documentation of the issue and made a clear case as to why the building should be torn down and upheld its previous decision. Supranowicz now has the option of appealing the order in court.
"This board is about ensuring public health," Chairman Stephen Smith said.
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue; please keep comments focused on the issues and not on personalities. Profanity, obscenity, racist language and harassment are not allowed. iBerkshires reserves the right to ban commenters or remove commenting on any article at any time. Concerns may be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com
Pittsfield School Officials Affirm Decision on Braves' Replacement
By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Committee affirmed its decision to replace the Taconic mascot on Wednesday.
"I think we are wading here into a parliamentary morass," committee member William Cameron said. "The point of the vote has been lost sight of as we struggle to find words to satisfy those people who won't be satisfied by anything but rescinding the vote."
School officials voted in August to eliminate the name, but the item was placed on the agenda again in September after a group of alumni and residents communicated that they were unclear that a vote would take place. They wanted a chance to speak to the matter.
click for more
McCandless said he took issue with some of the comments made and noted the administration made sure cafeteria employees were kept working through the outset of the pandemic and the summer.
click for more
A collaboration of the Berkshire District attorney's office and the Pittsfield Public Schools is using $25,000 in seed money in hopes of growing a sustainable program for social emotional learning in the schools. click for more
The council accepted an order from the mayor Tuesday to borrow an aggregate a sum not exceeding $8,470,000 for General Fund Capital Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2021 to address various city projects.
click for more
The city announced Tuesday that the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, or MassDOT, approved and funded the City of Pittsfield's grant application for the Shared Streets and Spaces Program in the amount of $238,826. click for more
Berkshire United Way and Miraval Berkshires have teamed up to honor an essential worker or first responder on the front lines of relief efforts in Berkshire County during the COVID-19 pandemic.
click for more