Letter: Question 1 Will Hurt Small Hospitals

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:
 

I work at Fairview Hospital as a critical care nurse. I have been with Berkshire Health Systems for 22 years and a registered nurse for 13 of those, I oppose Question 1.
 
In a small community hospital, we have the ability to utilize one another to accommodate our patients' needs. For example, The CCU may have three patients with low acuity but the emergency room (ER) is busy with patients, or possibly short a nurse. The three patients in CCU could be cared for by the second nurse so another nurse could be sent to the ER to help. Also in CCU we often see patients who need end-of-life care. In such times, a colleague takes over my other patients to allow me to spend one-on-one care to the patient or provide emotional support to families. This is all done by communication and collaboration between bedside staff, doctors and administration.
 
If Question 1 passed it would enforce rigid staffing ratios that are not geared toward patients' needs. Every patient is different, so we base decisions on acuity and collaboration rather than strict numbers. This approach allows us to communicate with doctors and other care team members to determine, "can we take more? Does this patient need one-on-one attention? What's happening on the ground right now and how can we make this work?"
 
This mandate would take autonomy away from me as a nurse. I need to be able to individualize care based on my own knowledge and comfort, not a rigid mandate.
 
The impact on the patients in our area would be severe. As a rural community hospital, we do not have access to ambulances on the scale of bigger cities do. If we are at capacity as decreed by the ratios and patients are arriving by ambulances that will tie those ambulances up. EMTs will be sitting in the driveway, caring for the patient until they are allowed to bring them in. Ambulances could also be forced to transfer patients to other facilities if our ratio is at the limit, this will put other community members at risk.
 
Safe staffing is crucial, but it needs to be individualized to each facility. Safe staffing should be created amongst each facilities health-care team and administration not by a bill that is rigid and across the board because patient care cannot be cookie-cutter.

LeeAnn Fleming-Hand
Great Barrington, Mass.

 

 


Tags: ballot measure,   election 2018,   


0 Comments
Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com

Great Barrington Forms Police Chief Search Committee

GREAT BARRINGTON, Mass. — The town has formed a Police Chief Search Committee to review applicants and recommend final candidates for the position.
 
Town Manager Mark Pruhenski has appointed the following eight individuals: Alf Barbalunga, chief probation officer for the Southern Berkshire District Court and Pittsfield Police Chief Michael Wynn, representing law enforcement; Great Barrington Finance Director Susan Carmel, representing town staff, and citizens-at-large Larissa Yaple, Mae Rose, Gwendolyn VanSant and Michael Bertelli.
 
"We are appreciative that so many residents stepped up to volunteer for this committee, and this reflects well on residents' dedication to local involvement, and to the future of our police department," Pruhenski said.
 
He noted that the committee members were selected from among 30 town residents who volunteered.
View Full Story

More Great Barrington Stories