William Levine opens the special town meeting with School Board Chairwoman Cynthia Lamore.
STAMFORD, Vt. — Stamford voters on Monday gave the go-ahead to continue down the path toward a potential school district merger with Clarksburg, Mass.
In a vote of 58-29-1, the special town meeting approved by paper ballot a continuing with Option 3 — a recommendation by the private consultants and the Interstate Merger Committee to create a unified district.
Also on a motion by Nancy Bushika, town meeting approved putting funding for the merger research on the annual town meeting warrant should the grant funds run out.
Clarksburg's Select Board is expected to set a date on Wednesday for its special town meeting. Approval by both towns will allow the merger committee, made up of members from both towns, to hire a part-time consultant or administrator to guide the effort through the legal, educational and governance issues.
Although the result was positive, the merger plan did receive some pushback from residents who questioned the decision to go with the third option proposed by Public Consulting Group.
Option 1 would mean no merger but would still require Stamford to take actions to comply with Vermont's Act 46 — legislation forcing school districts statewide to reorganize and consolidate. The measure was the impetus for Stamford to begin talks with Clarksburg rather than northward to districts farther away in Vermont.
Option 2 would leave the schools existing in their current grade K-8 configuration and share administrative services. This option was deemed as too costly, not as efficient in using building space and not providing educational benefits.
Option 3, which would create an early education center at Stamford and a Grade 3-8 school at Clarksburg within a unified district was determined by PCG, the merger and school committees as the best choice.
It would create larger classes so grades wouldn't have to be combined, more programming, better access to data, and early testing on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System instead of encountering it Mass high schools.
"We want to improve their chances and improve their educational opportunities," said Cynthia Lamore, chairman of the Board of School Directors.
But several residents thought there should have been a chance for voting on the other options.
"Why can't we go with Readsboro?" asked one man. "Clarksburg is a sinking ship."
Ed Fletcher asked why the committee couldn't "re-present" that past option with Readsboro.
"I came here expressly to vote as a parent and I would like to see the school remain as it is," said Nancy Lesage, who was concerned about how it would affect special education services.
Robert Bence said his son had graduated eighth grade with a class of 13 from Stamford, and it was great.
Members of the School Board and Merger Committee answer questions on Monday.
"But that's expensive and to have five pople in a class is really expensive," he said. "Can we afford a class of five people and give them a quality education?"
Lamore noted that the Southern Valley Unified Union School District of Readsboro and Halifax was having its own controversy in sending Readsboro's Grades 7 and 8 to Halifax because the class was so small.
Rejecting Option 3 was essentially a choosing Option 1, said school officials.
"As far as the state's concerned we have to show action, we have to show consolidation or merging with another district," Lamore said.
Stamford had voted not to join that school union two years ago, preferring to explore Clarksburg or gaining "isolated" status to go it's own way. School officials said there was little hope in becoming an isolated school although a few people thought the town should "push back."
But one man noted there has been pushback by towns and so far the courts have sided with the Board of Education. If they didn't choose Massachusetts, the state would decide.
"Vermont's not going to give us choices anymore," he said. "They're going to tell us specifically to join with Halifax. ... We're not going to have an option really."
Kelly Holland, a member of the merger committee, said the state has already stepped in to forcefully merge school districts when towns have failed to act.
"We're not trying to scare you, we're just telling you what we are seeing," she said.
Residents also brought up concerns over the condition of Clarksburg School, how the funding would work and how much control they would continue to have over the school building.
A small contingent continued after the vote to push for more research into becoming a town district with "isolated" status. Holland said she felt uncomfortable in doing a two-pronged approach because it would seem to undermine the town's commitment to an interstate merger in the eyes of Vermont. There was also, she noted, no money for that effort.
Lamore suggested they come to the School Board meeting on Tuesday to discuss creating a subcommittee to do some research.
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue; please keep comments focused on the issues and not on personalities. Profanity, obscenity, racist language and harassment are not allowed. iBerkshires reserves the right to ban commenters or remove commenting on any article at any time. Concerns may be sent to email@example.com.
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
Regulators Give Centers for Living and Rehabilitation High Marks for Infection Prevention
BENNINGTON, Vt. — The Centers for Living and Rehabilitation, part of Southwestern Vermont Health Care, has earned deficiency-free status, the highest given, on a survey meant to determine ability to prevent transmission of COVID-19 and other infections to those living, recovering, and working within long-term care facilities.
"CLR has always taken pride in its infection-prevention measures," said Suzanne Anair, the facility’s administrator. "When COVID-19 broke on the scene, our staff was ready to do what it took to protect patients, residents, and themselves. They have done a tremendous job."
On March 20, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, healthcare’s largest payer and most rigorous regulating body, declared that they would postpone normal survey activities in order to complete targeted infection-control surveys. According to the announcement, the purpose of the new surveys was to ensure "providers are implementing actions to protect the health and safety of individuals to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic." CLR's infection-focused survey was on April 9, 2020.
Infection-control measures are particularly important within long-term care settings, where shared living spaces among the vulnerable elderly population have led to high rates of infection and death.
CLR has cared for COVID patients and non-COVID patients throughout the pandemic. Leaders are proud to report that not a single known transmission of the virus has occurred at the facility.
"Considering that this is a contagious virus and our patients and residents are among the most vulnerable, we are grateful that we started to protect our building early by following CDC guidelines," said Dr. Jim Poole, CLR's medical director. "It is working."
One measure was restricting visitors to those providing medical care only.
After only two weeks of design, testing and manufacturing, Mack's team at Synectic fabricated an attachment to a snorkeling scuba mask. The mask covers the entire face and thus does not require the use of disposable masks and shields. click for more