Candidates Set for Mount Greylock School Committee

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee will have at least three new faces on the seven-person panel after the Nov. 3 general election.
 
This week, the district released the names of the candidates who have been certified for the ballot.
 
One of the committee's three seats assigned to Lanesborough residents is up for election.
 
Incumbent Al Terranova chose not to run for re-election. Michelle Johnson, a runner-up two years ago, is the lone candidate for the four-year position.
 
In 2018, just after the full regionalization of the district (and the elimination of the Lanesborough Elementary and Williamstown Elementary School Committees), Mount Greylock's seven seats were split into either two-year or four-year terms in order to create staggered terms in subsequent biennial elections.
 
In addition to Terranova, Williamstown's Alison Carter and Joe Bergeron were elected to two-year terms in 2018.
 
Carter has chosen to not run for re-election. Bergeron resigned from the committee last year, and his appointed replacement, Jamie Art, is not running for the seat in his own right.
 
Meanwhile, Dan Caplinger, who was elected in '18 to a four-year term, also stepped down from the committee mid-term. His appointed replacement, Carolyn Greene, is running to serve out the remaining two years on the term.
 
All three of the Williamstown resident seats are contested.
 
Greene is being challenged by Elisabeth Beck.
 
There are three candidates on the ballot for the two four-year seats up for grabs (formerly Bergeron's and Carter's Caplinger's). Newcomers Julia Bowen, Jose Constantine and Jude Higdon-Topaz have secured places on the ballot.
 
The top two vote-getters from that group each will win a seat.
 
Voters from Lanesborough and Williamstown vote in all the races on the ballot.

Tags: election 2020,   MGRSD,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Affordable Housing Trust Hears Objections to Summer Street Proposal

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Neighbors concerned about a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week raised the specter of a lawsuit against the town and/or Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity.
 
"If I'm not mistaken, I think this is kind of a new thing for Williamstown, an affordable housing subdivision of this size that's plunked down in the middle, or the midst of houses in a mature neighborhood," Summer Street resident Christopher Bolton told the Affordable Housing Trust board, reading from a prepared statement, last Wednesday. "I think all of us, the Trust, Habitat, the community, have a vested interest in giving this project the best chance of success that it can have. We all remember subdivisions that have been blocked by neighbors who have become frustrated with the developers and resorted to adversarial legal processes.
 
"But most of us in the neighborhood would welcome this at the right scale if the Trust and Northern Berkshire Habitat would communicate with us and compromise with us and try to address some of our concerns."
 
Bolton and other residents of the neighborhood were invited to speak to the board of the trust, which in 2015 purchased the Summer Street lot along with a parcel at the corner of Cole Avenue and Maple Street with the intent of developing new affordable housing on the vacant lots.
 
Currently, Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity, which built two homes at the Cole/Maple property, is developing plans to build up to five single-family homes on the 1.75-acre Summer Street lot. Earlier this month, many of the same would-be neighbors raised objections to the scale of the proposed subdivision and its impact on the neighborhood in front of the Planning Board.
 
The Affordable Housing Trust board heard many of the same arguments at its meeting. It also heard from some voices not heard at the Planning Board session.
 
And the trustees agreed that the developer needs to engage in a three-way conversation with the abutters and the trust, which still owns the land, to develop a plan that is more acceptable to all parties.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories