State Auditor Publishes Election Reimbursements

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — State Auditor Suzanne M. Bump says the state must give cities and towns more than $2.48 million to cover the cost of extra mandated polling hours for the 2012 March Presidential primary, the September state primary and the November final elections.

The amounts dispersed vary wildly. North adams will receive $6,552 and Pittsfield $14,742, with smaller communities like Williamstown ($1,161), Clarksburg ($684) and Sheffield ($603) getting much less.

The auditor's Division of Local Mandates determined in 1983 that a state law requiring municipalities to keep voting places open three extra hours was an unfunded mandate and that the state must pay for the increase in election-day staffing costs. The hours are usually earlier and later than regular municipal elections.

"The intent of the mandate was to make it easier for citizens to get to the polls before and after work and increase participation in national and state elections," said Bump. "These extra hours increased the financial burden on cities and towns which we determined should be the responsibility of the state."

Every two years, DLM certifies how much the state must pay cities and towns to implement this state-mandated service by requiring communities to document additional election-day costs. This year, DLM streamlined the certification process by introducing an electronic certification form that all 351 municipal election officials were required to submit by the end of July. DLM then audited and certified each form and Bump forwarded a report detailing the costs to the secretary of state on Sept. 15. The secretary of state distributes the money to each community prior to the scheduled elections.

Bump certified $827,811 in extra costs for the March presidential primary, and $1,655,623 for the fall elections. The combined amounts range from $244,694 for the city of Boston to $99 for the small town of Ashfield in the western part of the state. Since 1984, DLM has certified more than $21 million for direct state payments to cities and towns for this mandate.


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Officials: Unlimited Trash Not Sustainable, Toters Offer Cost-Savings

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Unlimited trash pickup is not sustainable and will lead to higher taxes, city officials say.

Mayor Peter Marchetti began public outreach on Monday on the proposed five-year contract with Casella Waste Management for solid waste and recyclables. Older residents packed into the Ralph J. Froio Senior Center for the first of three community meetings.

On the table is a move to automated pickup utilizing 48-gallon toters, which would be at no cost to residents unless they require additional toters and would save the city $80,000 per year.

The goal is to execute a contract by July 1, the start of the fiscal year.

"Trash collection is not free. You're already paying for it as part of your taxes that you pay. In this administration, in this proposal there is no 'I'm looking to create a trash tax,''' Marchetti said, explaining that trash pickup for fiscal year 2025 is around $5.1 million and has doubled since he first served on the council in 2002.

"So we need to find a way to stem the cost of trash."

Some of the seniors praised the new plan while others had concerns, asking questions like "What is going to happen to the trash cans we have now?" "What if I live in rural Pittsfield and have a long driveway?" and "What happens if my toter is stolen?"

"I've lived in a lot of other places and know this is a big innovation that is taking place over the last 20,30 years," one resident said. "It's worked in most places. It's much better than throwing bags of garbage on the side of the road."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories