image description

Williamstown Selectmen Won't Back Farm Bylaw Changes

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Board of Selectmen unanimously voted not to recommend warrant articles that would allow farms to have music or celebrations on their grounds.

Board members did, however, move to recommend a less intrusive request to hold physical or creative classes in music, dance, yoga or similar activities. No one spoke in favor of the bylaws.

The zoning law amendments had been brought forward by Cricket Creek Farm, which has been hoping to boost its revenues by hosting weddings and large celebrations. The issue has run into opposition from neighbors in South Williamstown and concerns from the Planning and Zoning boards. The Planning Board voted on March 1 to recommend the bylaws after a compromise was reached over language.

"I want to find other ways to support farms ... This is not smart," said Selectman Tom Costley. "It's not what a farm was intended to do. I understand farms need to be creative but if I moved there, it's not what I would have expected."

The bylaw change would allow local farms, as defined in the town's Right to Farm bylaw, to host events with amplified music between the hours of 10 a.m. and 11 p.m. The Selectmen worried about the effects of traffic and noise on the rural areas and dirt roads.

"I'm concerned about the impact on a particular area of town," said Selectman David Rempell. "Weddings are weddings — they're huge celebrations."

Selectwoman Jane Allen had issues with a bylaw that would leave complaints and compliance for multiple events in the hands of the ZBA.

Moderator Mark Gold, speaking as a resident of South Williamstown, said the town could be setting a precedent in changing bylaws for a specific industry so it could engage in activities outside of its main business.

"This has been boxed in a 'save the farms' package ... no one is saying this is good for the town and no one is saying this is good for the neighborhood," he said. "This is about revenue for the farms."


He asked what would happen if a group of physicians came and asked for a bylaw change to aid their business. "The cost, frankly, is way to high for the people who live there and sets a dangerous precedent."

(Gold said he would step down as moderator during the time the three articles are on the floor; former Moderator Stan Parese will take over.)

The selectmen voted 5-0 not to recommend the bylaw to town meeting; after a short debate they also felt they couldn't recommend a complementary article that would have allowed small concerts (40 people or less) until 9:30 p.m. because it didn't define if the music was acoustic or amplified.

The board failed to give full support for long-debated bylaw to allow second dwelling units in certain areas, voting 4-1 to recommend it. The bylaw, formulated by the Planning Board, would allow property owners to create so-called "mother-in-law" apartments within single-family homes, by adding on or building a detached structure.

Allen was the lone vote against recommendation, citing concerns over drainage, setbacks and permitting, some of which had been raised by the Zoning Board. 

"It's hard because I know the affordable housing supports this," she said. "I'm all for more affordable housing in Williamstown but I'm not sure this article has been vetted well enough. ... I think there are unintended consequences."

The annual town meeting set for Tuesday, May 15, at 7 p.m. at the elementary school.

Tags: affordable housing,   agriculture,   bylaws,   development,   town meeting,   warrant,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories