Independent Investor: Rolling Over Your 401(k) — Or Not

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
So you've just been laid off or down-sized or fired, regardless of the term used, you are now looking for another job in an environment that is less then ideal.

The phone rings and a hard-charging financial adviser gives you his sales pitch on why you should roll over your 401(k) tax-deferred employment plan at your former employer into an IRA right now. Before you agree consider your options.

The first thing to consider is whether you have been happy with the performance of your now ex-employer's handling of your retirement account. Aside from matching your contributions at some level (usually 3 to 5 percent) of your yearly contributions, have you been happy with the way your money has been invested?  For many employees the answer has been a resounding "no" since last year many 401(k) plans have lost anywhere from 20 to 50 percent of their investment value.

But as long as your balance is greater than $5,000 you still might want to leave your money there until you find a new job for the following reasons:

If you are 55 years old but less than 59 1/2 and you are out of a job for a protracted length of time you may need to tap your 401(k) savings to support yourself. Depending on your retirement plan, you may be able to withdraw money without paying a penalty. You may also "loan" yourself some money from you 401(k) plan as well. Once you roll that money over into an IRA you may not have that freedom. In addition, assuming you get a new job and your new employer offers a 401(k) plan (most do) you can then roll your old plan into your new one tax-free.

Of course, there are benefits to rolling your money over into an IRA. In this environment, anything can happen to a company so leaving behind your 401(K) out of neglect or laziness is not too smart. I did that several years ago only to discover that while my 401(K) sat in cash I missed a four-year bull market in stocks. Normally, there are far more investment selections in an IRA while most 401(K) plans are restricted to a fairly limited menu of investment choices.

So how does one rollover a 401(K) plan? First we must understand the difference between a transfer and a rollover. When you transfer your 401(K) you never take physical custody of your funds as they move between your old 401(K) plan and your new IRA account. You can open such an account at a broker, money manager, bank or a mutual fund IRA. This is the preferred process.


With a rollover, your old company sends you a check after liquidating your investments in the plan. You then have the responsibility of depositing this amount into a rollover IRA account within a certain amount of time (usually 60 days). If you are under 59 1/2 and do not get this accomplished, you will be subject to a 10 percent penalty tax so make sure you have your rollover account set up beforehand.

In addition, when the company makes the check out to you it is required to withhold 20 percent of your money for taxes. Even though you deposit the full amount before the 60-day time period is up you won't get the withheld money back until you file your taxes in the following year. That means you have to come up with the additional 20 percent of your money within that 60 days in order to roll over the full amount. Unless you have a very good reason, I advise readers not to take this route.

Normally, you can transfer any investments you already have in your 401(K) to an IRA. However, sometimes if you also own company stock in your plan there may be added capital gain or income tax consequences so it is best to consult an accountant in those circumstances before transferring company stock.

Whatever you decide, don't make the mistake of cashing out your 401(K) when you leave your job.  Unfortunately, about 45 percent of laid-off workers and 66 percent of workers under 30 who have lost their jobs take their money and run. Not only do you pay a 10 percent penalty for doing that (if you are under 59 1/2 years old) but you also pay income tax on the money as well. But the worst consequence is invisible and unrealized. That cash could have continued to earn, compound and earn more money again and again for years into the future at a tax-free rate.

Losing your job is bad enough, don't compound it by throwing away your future retirement as well.

Bill Schmick is a licensed investment adviser representative as well as a registered financial consultant. All views and opinions expressed by Bill in his columns are strictly his own. Direct your inquiries to him at 1-518-610-1553 or wschmick@fairpoint.net. You can also visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill's insight.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Passes FY 2027 Budget, Warrant Articles

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Town meeting on Tuesday approved an almost $14 million fiscal 2027 budget, and approved bylaws for short-term rentals and signage, and for public safety vehicles. 
 
Of the 20 warrant articles, one, Article 7, to use free cash to pay prior fiscal year bills of $941.27 was indefinitely postponed by Moderator David Rolle because the bills were for the fire association.
 
Some 247 of the town's more than 2,600 registered voters filled Lanesborough Elementary School, debating articles during a meeting that lasted more than three hours. 
 
The town's 2027 spending plan is up more than 10 percent, with the main increases from higher enrollment in the regional schools and the McCann Technical School renovation project.
 
Voters approved the assessment of $7,586,284 for Mount Greylock Regional School. They also approved Article 11, which was the use of $16,298.48 in free cash for the McCann's roof and window replacement project so as not to impact the budget. 
 
Ambulance Director Jen Weber is planning 24-hour coverage, which means more staff and a hike in her budget. Article 5 asked the town to appropriate $234,100 to operate the Ambulance Enterprise Fund for salaries and expenses, which passed.
 
Fire Chief Jeff DeChaine spoke to the audience on his articles and the need for a new truck to replace the 1996 fire truck, listed on the warrant articles for a total $813,366, which includes a $100,000 contingency cost on whether a 2026 model-year chassis can be secured before new emissions standards in 2027. If they get the 2026 chassis, that contingency likely won't be needed.
 
View Full Story

More Stories