The Independent Investor: Is Massachusetts Health Care Reform Working?

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
As the Obama health-care initiative occupies the nation's center stage, Massachusetts' landmark, employer-paid Medical Security Program continues to be touted as a model for national reform. This week's news that the program will run out of money by January, thanks to the high rate of the state's unemployment and ballooning medical costs, makes one wonder if the model is working.

Clearly the state's claim to fame is the decline in the rate of the medically uninsured to 2.6 percent. That feat should be applauded since the national average is closer to 15 percent. The Connector Board, an independent state agency, steers consumers to six private insurers that offer four different levels of coverage.

Coverage is mandatory ($1,000 penalty per year for noncompliance). The state subsidizes individuals earning $32,500 or less ($66,000 for a family of four) and no one can be denied insurance or charged higher rates because of their health or pre-existing conditions. Residents who cannot afford even the lowest-priced plan can apply to the board for a penalty waiver.

Today, rising medical costs are threatening the viability of the program. A Payment Reform Commission has been created to address this issue. In July, the commission released a report making a first stab at moderating costs through pursuing a "global payments" system. How such a system would be implemented or the time period required was not clearly delineated. Still, don't blame the state for going slow since even the best minds in the nation have yet to come up with a solution to medical cost containment. It's one of the issues that have stalled progress on the national level.

Another unanticipated problem with the Massachusetts reform is the lack of affordability among many individuals and families earning above the subsidized income level, especially for residents aged 50 to 64. Quite a few residents have been able to prove that the plan choices are simply not affordable at their income level while others opted to pay the penalty because it was cheaper than paying the insurance premiums.

In addition, the law allows insurers to raise premiums as people get older. In some cases, older folks can be paying twice the rate as a younger person. That makes sense on an economic basis since generally the older one gets the more health care one requires, but what if you can't afford it?   This can be a very real problem here in the Berkshires where the population is generally older than the state's average. Given the current recession and the high rate of unemployment, being forced by the government to buy insurance that you can't afford is the stuff of which nightmares are made.

Speaking of unemployment, the bill was passed in boom times (2006) when the state was enjoying full employment, so linking your job and insurance coverage seemed sensible. Today, an increasing number of our citizens are out of work and out of insurance without applying for state subsidies. That raises the costs of the program, thus the recent warning that the program will run out of money by the first of the year. To date, spending for the program has doubled from $630 million in 2007 to estimates of as much as $1.3 billion this year.

Dr. Susanne King, a child psychologist based in Lenox, is an outspoken advocate for a single-payer system of health care and has written frequently on the problems of the Massachusetts health-care system. Single-payer is a system whereby a single organization (the government, for example) would collect all health-care fees and pay out all health-care costs.

"We could save $8 billion to 10 billion if we moved to a single-payer system. You see it's not the distribution system — the doctors, hospitals, treatment — that needs fixing, it's the administration of this system that needs to be rethought," argues Dr. King.

Given the mounting fiscal troubles Massachusetts is facing, will the taxpayer be asked to make up the difference or will it be levied on the business sector? One thing is for sure, health-care reform is here to stay in Massachusetts but that doesn't mean it can't be remodeled to answer the challenges we face.

Bill Schmick is a registered investment adviser and portfolio manager with Berkshire Money Management (BMM), managing over $180 million for Americans in the Berkshires. Bill’s forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of BMM. None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-888-232-6072 (toll free) or at wschmick@berkshiremm.com. Visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill’s insights.

Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of BMM or a solicitation to become a client of BMM. The reader should not assume that any strategies, or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold or held by BMM.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Man Accused of Kidnapping, Shooting Pittsfield Man

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A Dalton man was arrested on Thursday evening after allegedly kidnapping and shooting another man.

Nicholas Lighten, 35, was arraigned in Central Berkshire District Court on Friday on multiple charges including kidnapping with a firearm and armed assault with intent to murder. He was booked in Dalton around 11:45 p.m. the previous night.

There was heavy police presence Thursday night in the area of Lighten's East Housatonic Street home before his arrest.

Shortly before 7 p.m., Dalton dispatch received a call from the Pittsfield Police Department requesting that an officer respond to Berkshire Medical Center. Adrian Mclaughlin of Pittsfield claimed that he was shot in the leg by Lighten after an altercation at the defendants home. Mclaughlin drove himself to the hospital and was treated and released with non-life-threatening injuries. 

"We were told that Lighten told Adrian to go down to his basement, where he told Adrian to get down on his knees and pulled out a chain," the police report reads.

"We were told that throughout the struggle with Lighten, Adrian recalls three gunshots."

Dalton PD was advised that Pittsfield had swabbed Mclaughlin for DNA because he reported biting Lighten. A bite mark was later found on Lighten's shoulder. 

Later that night, the victim reportedly was "certain, very certain" that Lighten was his assailant when shown a photo array at the hospital.

According to Dalton Police, an officer was stationed near Lighten's house in an unmarked vehicle and instructed to call over the radio if he left the residence. The Berkshire County Special Response Team was also contacted.

Lighten was under surveillance at his home from about 7:50 p.m. to about 8:40 p.m. when he left the property in a vehicle with Massachusetts plates. Another officer initiated a high-risk motor vehicle stop with the sergeant and response team just past Mill Street on West Housatonic Street, police said, and traffic was stopped on both sides of the road.

Lighten and a passenger were removed from the vehicle and detained. Police reported finding items including a brass knuckle knife, three shell casings wrapped in a rubber glove, and a pair of rubber gloves on him.

The response team entered Lighten's home at 43 East Housatonic before 9:30 p.m. for a protective sweep and cleared the residence before 9:50 p.m., police said. The residence was secured for crime scene investigators.

View Full Story

More Stories