image description
Planners Elizabeth McGowan,left, Chairwoman Amy Jeschawitz and Sarah Gardner seen in April at a board meeting. An Open Meeting Law complaint filed against the board, and specifically against members McGowan, Gardner and Anne McCallum was found without merit on Monday.

AG: No Open Meeting Law Violation by Williamstown Planning Board

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The attorney general's office determined there is no evidence of an Open Meeting Law violation by members of the Planning Board with respect to its deliberations on the Waubeeka Golf Links zoning bylaw earlier this year.
 
In a letter dated Monday and posted on the AGO's website, Assistant Attorney General Kevin W. Manganaro writes that "we find that the Board did not violate the Open Meeting Law.
 
"In reaching a determination, we reviewed the original complaint, the Board's response, and the request for further review filed with our office. We also reviewed the minutes of two Board meetings held on April 28 and May 4. Finally, we reviewed e-mail correspondence between Board member Ann McCallum and Director of Community Development Andrew Groff, dated May 2."
 
The complaint was filed by resident David Leja, who alleged three members of the five-person board met in private and "worked with a group of individuals, including an abutter attorney, to draft an amendment related to a proposed Waubeeka Golf Club Inn [sic] project."
 
The Planning Board made a formal response to the complaint in May, shortly after it was filed. At the time, the board decided there was no violation, a determination confirmed by the AGO this week.
 
The ruling from Boston puts a coda on a particularly turbulent and, at times, nasty 2016 town election season.
 
Spurred by the controversy over a proposed bylaw at the South Williamstown golf course, there were two contested races for the Planning Board.
 
One of the candidates, Sarah Gardner, was accused by name of violating the OML in the complaint, timed and released to the media just before town election day.
 
Gardner ended up losing her bid for a five-year seat on the Planning Board by a margin of 811-681, a difference of 54 percent to 46 percent.
 
Of the other two planners named in the complaint, Elizabeth McGowan was not standing for re-election, and Ann McCallum, whose term was not expiring, continues to serve on the board.
 
When the Planning Board considered the OML complaint, days after the election, Gardner speculated about its purpose.
 
"[Leja] stated that he was encouraged to file this, and I'd like to know who encouraged him because it was clearly timed to come out on election day," Gardner said.
 
A request to Planning Board Chairwoman Amy Jeschawitz for comment was not immediately returned.

Williamstown Planning Board Open Meeting Law Findings: OML_09212016 by iBerkshires.com on Scribd


Tags: open meeting complaint,   Planning Board,   waubeeka,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Article 41 on Williamstown Town Meeting Warrant

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The town warrant for the upcoming town meeting has just been published. Many people think Article 41 warrants thought and discussion prior to the meeting. Here it is verbatim below:

Article 41. We the undersigned citizens [they are not listed on the warrant] of Williamstown submit this petition to respectfully request the amendment of bylaw 4.12a to include the display of the Progress Pride flag (designed by Daniel Quasar) as an expression of the Town's official sentiments.

WHEREAS: Inclusion and Representation: The addition of a Progress Pride flag to the list of flags permitted for display by the Town is essential to reflect the diversity and inclusivity of our community. It serves as a meaningful gesture of respect, support, and recognition of the LGBTQ+ individuals and allies with the Town of Williamstown.
WHEREAS: Symbol of Equality and Unity: A Progress Pride flag is globally recognized as a symbol of equality, acceptance, and unity. By officially allowing the display of a Progress Pride flag alongside other recognized flags, the Town of Williamstown can showcase its commitment to fostering an inclusive and supportive environment for all residents, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
WHEREAS: Importance of Visibility: Public visibility of the Progress Pride flag serves to create a sense of belonging, safety and affirmation for LGBTQ+ individuals and their families. It sends a powerful message of solidarity and support, contributing to a more welcoming and cohesive community.
WHEREAS: As concerned citizens, we believe that the inclusion of the Progress Pride flag in the official display of flags aligns with the values of diversity, equality and inclusivity that we hold dear in our community.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
Bylaw 4.12a shall be amended to say, "and fourth, a Progress Pride flag."

The DIRE Committee unanimously recommends the adoption of this article.
The Select Board unanimously recommends the adoption of this article.

Donna Wied
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories