Independent Investor: Pass the Plan

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
Both sides of the congressional aisle agreed on a framework for the multibillion-dollar financial market's rescue on Thursday afternoon. There will be further haggling on the details but it looks as if the deal will pass. It better.

That's not to say I'm happy about it. It ticks me off that we have to pay for the mistakes of a bunch of greedy bankers and brokers, but self-preservation dictates that we go along with the plan. As for the add-ons that Congress is proposing, the more the merrier. 

After all, the plan will be costing each of us more than $2,000 so we might as well have some of that money go to bailing out middle-class Americans.

Frankly, I was a bit surprised at first by the number of Americans who are against this bail-out. In discussing the situation with my wife, who is one of the most intelligent, intuitive people I know, it quickly dawned on me why.

"So why should we bail out a bunch of blood-sucking banks?" she demanded.

"Because if we don't you won't be able to get a car loan, a mortgage or maybe even a job in six months," I said

She looked at me cynically. In order to justify my statement, I knew I would need to explain the arcane business of credit swaps, derivatives and CDS defaults. I began but stopped, tongue-tied. I realized it was just too much to explain or absorb without a deep background in business and an hour of discussion.


Instead I boiled it down to this: the lifeblood of business is lending — overnight, weekly, monthly or yearly loans; it is what provides everything we produce, consume and save.  Without lending, everything stops.

Last week, the world stopped. 

Lenders were afraid to lend. Borrowers, no matter how credit worthy, could not borrow. If this credit freeze continued it would have ushered in a huge recession if not an outright second depression.

There will be ramifications, however. I believe the entire free-market model of the last 50 years will be re-examined while the unquestioned economic leadership of the United States since the end of World War II may now be in doubt. An overhaul and updating of the regulations is certain. 

What impact this will have on our financial institutions and the way we do business going forward will provide additional challenges and opportunities. One thing is for sure: it will be a brave new world for all of us.

Bill Schmick is a licensed investment adviser representative and portfolio strategist with Berkshire-based Dion Money Management, managing over $700 million for middle-class Americans from coast to coast. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-877-850-7942, Ext. 146 (toll free) or wschmick@dionmm.com. You can also visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill’s insight.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Passes $232.7M Budget

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council unanimously approved a $232.7 million budget for the upcoming fiscal year. 

It is a modest, almost 2.9 percent increase from FY26. 

"I do want to give the community kind of a heads up as we move forward on budgets. What we see coming out of the federal government that's trickling down to the states, it's going to be harder and harder for us as a community to meet our needs under the Proposition 2 1/2," Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said. 

"We're going to have challenges, as we've seen communities across the state trying to override the Proposition 2 1/2, because we have dwindling amounts of money coming from the state and federal government." 

She pointed out that, at the same time, utility bills are going up for both residents and the city, as are the costs of pavement and other items. 

The amended budget of $232,777,720, down from the $232,782,090 originally proposed, includes cuts to the Department of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and the restoration of funds for councilors to attend the annual Massachusetts Municipal Association conference. 

The Pittsfield Public Schools' $86,855,061 budget includes $68,886,061 in state Chapter 70 funding and $18 million from the city. With $345,000 in school choice and Richmond tuition revenues, it totals $87,200,061 and is an approximately $300,000 increase from the Pittsfield Public Schools' FY26 budget of $86.9 million. 

The district's budget will fund 13 schools, as Morningside Community School will retire in the fall, and includes the middle school restructuring. 

Councilors also approved the use of $2 million in certified free cash to reduce the tax rate, and appropriated $450,551 for parking-related expenditures. 

View Full Story

More Stories