image description

Independent Investor: Treasury Floats a Mortgage Trial Balloon

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
Wednesday night, the U.S. Treasury Department leaked the rough details of a plan designed to boost home sales. The scheme would use the weight of government-owned mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to "encourage" banks to lend money a full point below existing 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages. OK, I admit, that got my attention.

No, it isn't a total solution to the housing mess since it does nothing to solve the foreclosure problem, which continues to worsen. Nor does it allow homeowners struggling with high adjustable-rate payments to refinance at the lower rate. What it could do however is allow as many as 2.5 million Americans to make a hefty dent in the growing inventory of unsold homes.

To me, the plan would make more sense if they permit re-financings. Otherwise, we would end up with a two-tier interest rate scheme: one rate for new buyers and a higher rate for everyone else. If history is any guide, it would take less than a nano-second before some enterprising mortgage company figures a way to arbitrage the two rates while circumventing the intent of the plan.

Some critics rightfully argue that it would help those least in need of a bail-out. It would allow the wealthy or those with jobs with financial assets to buy up real estate at bargain basement prices with the lowest interest rate in 50 years.

True enough but riddle me this, dear reader: how else are we going to get those buyers sitting on the fence to actually plunk money down on a home? Prices have already dropped 20 to 30 percent and still the inventory of houses for sale continues to rise. Without an incentive will housing prices have to fall by 20 percent, 40 percent or even more?

There will also be a salutatory ripple effect on overall mortgage rates as well as home equity loans. As more and more houses are sold at the lower rate, I believe it will pressure other lenders to lower their rates in order to attract some of that new business. That would benefit those most in need.

Take my situation for example. Fortunately, I'm one of those writers who follow my own advice. Over the last few years, I've managed to pay down debt. At the same time my wife lost her job this summer and prospects for employment seem dismal. I vacillate between wanting to buy a home closer to work and enjoying my debt-free security. I've been looking and waiting for home prices to decline further. If this 4.5 percent fixed-rate plan actually happens, I would be sorely tempted to take the plunge.       

Detractors of the plan argue that the last thing the country needs right now is for another couple million of us to go into debt. Since hundreds of thousands of workers are projected to lose their jobs next year, saddling oneself with a 30-year mortgage could be financial suicide. Others say that lowering interest rates is what created the housing bubble in the first place and this plan is simply an attempt to revive that process.

Clearly, it would do nothing for those who are unemployed or shortly will be losing their jobs. Banks lend or re-finance on the customer's ability to re-pay not on what collateral the borrower can put up. Recent forecasts point to a doubling of this year's 2.25 million foreclosures by the end of 2009 because of job losses and the recession.  The government has already begun to address those issues through a variety or programs.

However, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress on Thursday that "more needed to be done" to stem foreclosures in the country. He outlined several new avenues lawmakers should consider. No doubt, the new administration will do just that. And yes, it would be nice if someone could come up with one simple solution for the myriad of problems that seem to pop on a daily basis in this economic maelstrom.

But wishing gets us no where. This plan actually addresses part of the demand side of this housing problem and because it does it deserves our attention.

Bill Schmick is a licensed investment adviser representative and portfolio strategist as well as a registered financial planner with Berkshire-based Dion Money Management, which manages more than $500 million for middle-class Americans from coast to coast. Direct your inquires to Bill at 1-877-850-7942, Ext. 146, (toll-free) or e-mail him at wschmick@dionmm.com. You can also visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill's insight.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Town Meeting to Vote Budget, Bylaws & Vehicle Purchases

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Tuesday's annual town meeting includes a $14 million operating budget, new short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units and sign bylaws, and free cash article appropriations.

Voters will gather at Lanesborough Elementary School on June 9 at 6 p.m. to decide on 20 warrant articles.

The fiscal 2027 budget is up a little over 10 percent. Some of the main increases are the Mount Greylock Regional School District and McCann Technical School: the McCann assessment is up more than 30 percent based on factors including enrollment and the school renovation project, and Mount Greylock's is up 11 percent.

Article 11 is for the town to vote to approve from free cash the sum of $16,298.48 for the McCann Technical School roof and window replacement project so as not to impact the budget. Article 3 is  appropriate $7,586,284 for Mount Greylock Regional School assessment.

Another notable increase was in life and health insurance, showing an increase of about 26 percent.

Ambulance Director Jen Weber is planning 24-hour coverage, which means more staff and a hike in her budget. One of the articles asks the town to appropriate $234,100 to operate the Ambulance Enterprise Fund for salaries and expenses.

Many town departments are looking for new vehicles. The Fire Department is looking to replace its outdated 1996 fire engine. There are two articles related to the truck at a total of $813,366. Article 12 would transfer $225,000 from free cash into the Fire Truck Stabilization Fund; Article 13 would transfer $605,000 from the fund and authorize the borrowing of $208,366.08.

The total includes a $100,000 contingency cost to cover any additional costs if a 2026 model-year chassis cannot be secured before new emissions standards go into effect in 2027.

The board at its last meeting moved the $225,000 transfer to come before the borrowing article, changing the stabilization number. If the $225,000 is not voted on, then they will amend the next article's number on the floor, subtracting the $225,000. This shows the borrowing number significantly lower.

Article 17 asks for the transfer of $80,000 from free cash to replace a police cruiser.

Police Chief Rob Derksen's aim is to replace one vehicle every other year, meaning the oldest vehicle gets replaced about every 10 years. 

He stressed that if delayed this year, the town may have to double up in a future year to get back on schedule, and that paying later usually costs more. The article will ask for $80,000 from free cash, the vehicles used to be funded by the BHRD.

Lastly, the Highway Department is looking to replace a 2014 International dump truck that will be a total of $330,000 and will take two to three years to receive.

Money will be used from last year's approval of $250,000 from free cash for the replacement of a 2012 highway front-end loader that was underspent $49,261. Town meeting is being asked to approve  a transfer of $53,274.85 from free cash and the use of $227,464 from funds from the Sale of Town Real Estate to fund the balance.

Other free cash proposals include $1,200 to purchase software to support tracking and ongoing maintenance schedules of town-owned vehicles; $42,000 for the replacement of the Highway Department's storage shed roof, $200,000 to reduce the tax levy.

View Full Story

More Stories