image description

Williamstown Parents Unhappy with School Budget Cuts

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Parents and teachers quizzed the School Committee on Wednesday over decisions to cut staff in trying to close a $210,000 budget shortfall even school officials told them to prepare for "dire" times ahead.

"Unless a miracle occurs, we are going to have to ask the town for an override next year," said Chairman David Backus. "We need to show the town we've done everything we can."

While voters passed a Proposition 2 1/2 override in 2004, they rejected one in 2005, forcing the school to cut $120,000.

School officials say declining enrollment and revenues, has lead to leaner budgets with little fat left to cut. Next year's $6.1 million budget is depending on Gov. Deval Patrick's pledge to level fund Chapter 70 education aid, but that, said Superintendent Rose Ellis, is a "wild card" until the Legislature's budget is set.

"The end game is July," she said. "A lot can happen until then."

The elementary school expects to lose three teachers by eliminating one section each of kindergarten, fifth grade and sixth grade; a kindergarten, three sixth-grade and two other paraprofessionals, and a 20 percent reduction in hours of a library position for a total savings of $211,000.


Superintendent Rose Ellis explains a budget item; left, School Committee members Margaret McComish and David Backus. Below, two women keep busy at the meeting.

Parents worried over rumors that art and music are on the chopping block discovered they had some basis in fact. Principal Stephen Johnson said he had spoken to staff about the possibility of further cuts but music and art were safe for the moment.

Ellis gave an overview of the budget, the areas of reduction and how those reductions affected the school and staff.

She said more than $90,000 in savings had been made through the school's union with Lanesborough earlier this year, along with expected reductions in legal costs because contract negotiations were winding up. The teachers' association agreed to increase its members premium split to 25 percent, up from 20 percent and in line with the rest of the town's employees.

However, the health costs are still up $45,000 for the district, and 5.2 percent overall for the town, and contracted wages for instructional staff is increasing $210,000, or 6.7 percent.

But the 60-odd residents who attended the public hearing on the budget in the school auditorium were not convinced that school officials had searched every nook and cranny for savings. They were also concerned by rumors that the school's art and music offerings were about to be cut.

Several suggested that the administration was top heavy and should reduce hours or cut their wages rather than sacrifice teaching positions; others expressed concern over increases in the teacher/student ratio because of reduction in grade sections.

Ellis and Principal Stephen Johnson said they were aware of the class sizes and had ways to deal with them. Johnson said he had spoken with faculty about the possibility that art and music could be affected as a way to keep them informed. Nothing had been decided yet, he said.

Many of the questions asked by the audience had already been answered by the committee over years of putting tight budgets together, such as searching for savings in energy, insurance and transportation. Others asked how they could help in lobbying for grants or planning school benefits.

Ellis suggested getting in touch with local lawmakers to impress upon them the difficulties the school was having. Backus encouraged residents to attend town meeting to vote to return $114,000 in special education funds back to the school district after state auditors moved it the town's free cash account last summer.

"It may be news to you," Backus told the crowd, "but we've known for years we're in dire times."

The town Finance Committee will review the budget on March 26; the School Committee expects to approve it April 8.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories