image description

Anthony Museum Opening Delayed to 2010

Staff ReportsiBerkshires
Print Story | Email Story
ADAMS, Mass. — Continued research at the birthplace of the town's most famous daughter means the opening of the long-anticipated museum will be put off at least a year.

The board of directors of what is now the Susan B. Anthony Birthplace and Museum announced late last week that the museum will not be ready before early 2010. Still, 2010 will offer some nice round easy-to-remember numbers to mark the opening.

"Next year is the 90th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, and Susan B. Anthony's 190th birthday," said board President Carol Crossed in a statement. "The opening of the museum will be in conjunction with other national events to celebrate women's suffrage."

The 19th Amendment brought women the constitutional right to vote, a right that Anthony fought long and hard for but didn't live to see.

While her home in Rochester, N.Y., has been a museum for some years, her birthplace on East Road passed that her father built in the early 1800s passed from the family's hands long ago. It was purchased in 2006 by Crossed after another failed attempt to turn it into a museum of some type.

Transforming the private home into a historically accurate domicile with educational components has proven difficult for its new nonprofit owners as well.


The second floor, which includes offices and a custodial apartment has been completed, an addition demolished and the formerly white two-story structure painted a more traditional creamy color with black touches. Work has begun on the parking area and visitor's center.

Paint and other elements were being researched to bring the interior as close as possible to the condition it was in when Anthony was a child.

"We're letting this house tell us. We can't tell the house," said Crossed during an open house last March on the civil rights activist's 189th birthday. "We can't come in and assume things. We have to go very slowly and let it speak to us."

It had been expected to open in the spring, and then July. Historic accuracy has slowed the process, but in the end, according to board member Lorraine Robinson, it will be worth it to the community. 

"You have to do this right," said Robinson, a board member and chairman of a committee created to determine how best to preserve the building. "The town of Adams has waited more than 25 years to properly honor one of our nation's most famous women. What's another six months?"
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Progress Means Moving on Paper Mill Cleanup

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Our town is facing a clear choice: move a long-abandoned industrial site toward cleanup and productive use or allow it to remain a deteriorating symbol of inaction.

The Community Development team has applied for a $4 million EPA grant to remediate the former Curtis Mill property, a site that has sat idle for more than two decades. The purpose of this funding is straightforward: address environmental concerns and prepare the property for safe commercial redevelopment that can contribute to our tax base and economic vitality.

Yet opposition has emerged based on arguments that miss the point of what this project is designed to do. We are hearing that basement vats should be preserved, that demolition might create dust, and that the plan is somehow "unimaginative" because it prioritizes cleanup and feasibility over wishful reuse of a contaminated, aging structure.

These objections ignore both the environmental realities of the site and the strict federal requirements tied to this grant funding. Given the condition of most of the site's existing buildings, our engineering firm determined it was not cost-effective to renovate. Without cleanup, no private interest will risk investment in this site now or in the future.

This is not a blank check renovation project. It is an environmental remediation effort governed by safety standards, engineering assessments, and financial constraints. Adding speculative preservation ideas or delaying action risks derailing the very funding that makes cleanup possible in the first place. Without this grant, the likely outcome is not a charming restoration, it is continued vacancy, ongoing deterioration, and zero economic benefit.

For more than 20 years, the property has remained unused. Now, when real funding is within reach to finally address the problem, we should be rallying behind a practical path forward not creating obstacles based on narrow or unrealistic preferences.

I encourage residents to review the proposal materials and understand what is truly at stake. The Adams Board of Selectmen and Community Development staff have done the hard work to put our town in position for this opportunity. That effort deserves support.

Progress sometimes requires letting go of what a building used to be so that the community can gain what it needs to become.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories