The Berkshires online guide to events, news and Berkshire County community information.
   FEBRUARY 14, 2012 |
NORTH ADAMS, MA • NOW: 21 °   
MEMBERS SIGN IN | SIGN UP TODAY!   
Send news, tips, press releases and questions to info@iBerkshires.com
Noteworthy
TOP STORIES AROUND THE COUNTY

@theMarket: Gold Takes Center Stage as Markets Waffle

By Bill Schmick
iBerkshires Columnist
07:23PM / Saturday, September 05, 2009
Print | Email |
Important
0
Interesting
0
Funny
0
Awesome
0
Infuriating
0
Ridiculous
0

Bill Schmick
September arrived and stocks dropped on cue right out of the box with the S&P 500 breaking the 1,000 level on Monday. For four days in a row, the indexes moved lower before once again turning higher on Thursday and Friday.

It was as if all the hype about how bad the months of September and October usually are was a self-fulfilling prophecy. The problem for me is that corrections don't usually occur when everyone in the world is expecting them.

Clearly we had some encouraging economic news this week with 30-year, fixed mortgage rates falling to 5.08 percents, unemployment numbers, although still rising, were less than expected, the service sector improved and August retail sales numbers were mixed. That was good news since investors feared a rout in the back-to-school sales this year.

Yet, this improving picture did little to boost investor sentiment. Nor should it, say the bears, since much of this news has already been discounted by the markets. In order to move the markets higher, they say, something unexpected must occur. Although, I suspect the markets will continue to climb despite this bearish sentiment.

This week, however, it was gold that took center stage. Ever since reaching a high of $1,003 back in early March 2008, gold has been in a trading range mirroring the U.S. dollar. As the dollar declined, bullion moved higher and vice versa. Gold has always been considered a viable alternative to the world's paper currencies, especially in times of uncertainty. Recently that inverse relationship with the greenback appears to be wavering. This has both confused and confounded investors who have no use for gold on a fundamental basis.

On the other hand, technical analysts are excited by the recent action as gold came within 50 cents of breaking $1,000 this week before pulling back a bit on Friday. If it hits $1,000 it will be the third time gold has hit this magic number. This, according to analysts, would be an extremely positive development and would convince many traders that we would be on the verge of a new bull run for the metal.

John Roque, an old friend and a well-known technical analyst at WJB Capital Group Inc. in Manhattan, has created a relative ratio of gold to the S&P 500 stock index from December 1928 to the present. John breaks that time period down into four cycles. In the period between the late 1920s through the early 1940s (cycle 1) gold reached a peak of 4.5 times the S&P 500. During cycle 2, in the early 1970s, gold declined to 2.7 times the S&P. In Cycle 3, around January 1980, gold peaked at nearly 6 times the S&P. So far in this, the fourth cycle, this ratio has only been as high as 1.4 times which is slightly below the long-term average of 1.5 times the price of the S&P.

Now, that does not mean that gold necessarily will peak at four to five or even six times the S&P but it is reasonable to expect gold prices to at least reach or even move somewhat higher than the average. That could translate to a price of around $1,150 ounce or better.

I recall many analysts, who could be called  "gold bugs," have predicted that once gold breaches the $1,000 mark for a third time it will not go below that level in our lifetime. That of course remains to be seen. Traders who buy and sell commodities, unlike stocks or bonds, are largely guided by technical price levels.  Gold, for example, can be less than 10 cents away from a new price level (say, $1,000 ounce) but until it actually breaks that level, traders will only give you even odds that it will.

For those readers who want to play gold, I suggest you buy a mutual fund or exchange traded fund that invests in several commodities — basic metals, precious metals, maybe agriculture and oil — so that you spread the risk.  Commodities are speculative and not for the faint of heart. On its own, gold can easily move up or down as much as $30 ounce whipsawing unwary investors.

So if you can't stand that kind of heat, stay out of that particular kitchen and instead use my diversification suggestion. Otherwise, good hunting and let me know how you do.

Bill Schmick is a registered investment adviser and portfolio manager with Berkshire Money Management (BMM), managing over $180 million for Americans in the Berkshires. Bill’s forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of BMM. None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-888-232-6072 (toll free) or at wschmick@berkshiremm.com. Visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill’s insights.

Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of BMM or a solicitation to become a client of BMM. The reader should not assume that any strategies, or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold or held by BMM.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com
The gold to SP500 ratio is truly meaningless. It is great to look at in retrospect but it has essentially zero power in indicating where gold will go in the future. A sample set of 3 previous cycles (all determined in retrospect mind you) with peaks ranging from 2.7 to 6? I like the article but it is not true that you can expect it to reach the average in "this cycle" (which has not been defined as of yet either...it will only be determined in retrospect). This is not rigorous analysis. This is something for the county fair.
from: money mgron: 09-07-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Yet gold is up $10.20 this morning to just under $1,007 per ounce.

from: back in realityon: 09-08-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Dear Money Manager,
Thanks for your comments. I passed them along to John Roque who said it is only one of many variables he uses to determine the direction of the price of gold. He suggests, rather than simply criticize, you offer your own rigorous analysis, that is, unless you don't have one.
from: Bill Schmickon: 09-08-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Mr. Schmick,
Obviously from Mr. Roque's response I have offended him perhaps indicating that he is a bit insecure in his 'analysis'. In that regard, I think the advice you offer in your column is apropos: if you can't stand the heat stay out of that particular kitchen. When an analyst offers his thoughts in a public forum, they are unfortunately subject to critique.

The point was that the (ubiquitous) market index (Dow or S&P 500) to gold ratio is backward looking and has no value in determining a target (nor trend) for gold. The fact that gold is up today has nothing to do with the validity of the ratio as an investment tool. I do not know Mr. Roque nor his background but it is a simple point to prove - only not in this forum. Finally, I do offer my analysis to my clients.
from: money mgron: 09-08-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

money mgr says, "... is backward looking and has no value in determining a target (nor trend) for gold."



It sounds as if "money mgr" needs to buy a Statistics 101 textbook, go to the glossary, and read the defnition of "reversion to the mean."


Remember tech stocks in 1999? There was a reversion to the mean.


Remember financial stock in 2007? There was a reversion to the mean.


Remember the selloff in March 2009? There was a reversion to the mean.


...there seems to be a trend here.
from: back in realityon: 09-08-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

@back in reality
Stats 101 is exactly why the ratio is NOT useful. Do a true statistical analysis (scatterplot, Rsquared, significance) of the ratio and tell me if it proves robust. Consider - what was the ratio during previous cycles? What is the distribution of the sample data? I'm afraid it's likely that money mgr's contention is correct if you do a true analysis (not simply making elementary remarks that tech stocks were mean reverting.)
from: gold monkeyon: 09-08-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

As American author (and investor) Mark Twain famously said, history may not repeat itself, but it rhymes.
from: The Classicson: 09-09-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Gold Monkey,

Your reference of Modern Portfolio Theory terms does nothing to support your argument that reversion to the mean is not an applicable force that drives the price of an investment.

You are suggesting that valuation based on ratios (such as price-to-earnings, price-to-book, etc.) are meaningless tools.

True, such ratios have no "timing" power in regards to calling the precise move at a particular time, but to suggset that reversion to the mean does not occur in the investment world is ammateurish and naive.


And it is completely ridiculous to suggest that a scatterplot has any sort of predictive power. It's a misguided and obvious red herring used to distract from the facts.

And your inclusion of the coefficient of determination (or "rsquared", as you so cutely call it) is just too far out of context - clearly you don't know what you're talking about.



from: Back in Realityon: 09-09-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

@back in reality:
MPT? My comments were not derived from MPT. Your comment only makes me believe you aren't familiar with MPT.
I did not argue with reversion to the mean in every context, only this particular one and more specifically its presentation. I would suggest reading my comments again.

I never said that reversion to the mean does not occur in the investment world. Again, I would suggest you read my comments again or, to be fair, have someone read them to you.

I never said scatterplots were predictive. They are a statistical analysis tool that are often used in regression analysis. The rsquared (and consequently correlation) are within the context of a regression analysis.

Your comments are nonsensical.
from: gold monkeyon: 09-09-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

When "gold monkey" started making up that he actually knew something, gold was almost $1,000 per ounce.

Today, October 6, gold is at an all time high, trading at $1,045 per ounce.

For all of gold monkey's rantings and ravings, he lost out on a 5% trade over just a couple weeks. What is that? Something like a 120% annualized return?

Looks like gold monkey better get smart!
from: Back in Realityon: 10-06-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Gold is up AGAIN!

It seems that Gold Monkey don't know his flung feces from his missing chromosome.
from: Back in Realityon: 10-08-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Interesting.

September 4 to October 9

S&P 500 +5.41%

Gold +5.22%

Gold to S&P 500 Ratio Dropped from 0.98 to 0.97.
from: berkshire reson: 10-12-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)


RECENT STORIES



MOST VIEWED STORIES | MOST COMMENTS
iBerkshires.com Text Ads
www.mountainone.com
www.NARHCares.com
www.thewilliamsinn.com
waterstgrill.com
Advertise on iBerkshires.com



 
View All
Boys BB: Mount Greylock at...
2/9/2012 Lee High School defeated Mount Greylock Thursday...
Girls BB: Drury at Lee
2/10/12 Hot-Shooting Lee on Point against Drury, Friday...
2012 Bay State Games
[Photos by Paul Guillotte]
Vermont Lumberyard Fire
An Eagle Lumber Co. warehouse on Robillard Road in...
Father-Daughter Valentine's...
Dads and daughters were all dressed up for the 18th annual...
Boys BB: Pittsfield at Drury
2/8/12 Wednesday, was senior night at Drury High School....
Girls BB: Greylock at McCann
McCann fell to visiting Mount Greylock 55-30 at the...
Girls BB: Wahconah at Drury
Drury held on to beat Wahconah 47-45, Tuesday night at...
Boys BB: Monument at Drury
Monument Mountain outlasted Drury 53-51 in overtime on...
Girls BB: Taconic at Greylock
Taconic took down Mount Greylock 52-46 at the Mountie Dome...
Boys BB: St. Joe's at PHS
1/30/12 St. Joe's 70-64 win over city rival Pittsfield High...
2012 Annual UCP Telethon
United Cerebral Palsy of Berkshire County's 49th annual...
Boys BB: Hoosac Valley at...
Bird Breaks Out to Lead Devils over Hurricanes, on Tuesday...
Girls BB: Hoosac at Drury
Drury outscored Hoosac 27-13 in the second half in route to...
Boys BB: Drury at Greylock
Drury held on to beat Mt. Greylock 45-39 at the Mountie...
Girls BB: Drury at Mount...
1/16/12 Fourth-Quarter Run Pushes Devils Past Mounties...
Boys BB: Mount Greylock at...
2/9/2012 Lee High School defeated Mount Greylock Thursday...
Girls BB: Drury at Lee
2/10/12 Hot-Shooting Lee on Point against Drury, Friday...
2012 Bay State Games
[Photos by Paul Guillotte]
Vermont Lumberyard Fire
An Eagle Lumber Co. warehouse on Robillard Road in...
Father-Daughter Valentine's...
Dads and daughters were all dressed up for the 18th annual...
Plus...


| Home | A & E | Business | Community News | Dining | Real Estate | Schools | Sports & Outdoors | Berkshires Weather | Weddings | Berkshires Map |
Advertise | Recommend This Page | Help Contact Us | Privacy Policy| User Agreement
iBerkshires.com is owned and operated by: Boxcar Media 106 Main Street, P.O. Box 1787 North Adams, MA 01247 -- T. 413-663-3384 F.413-663-3615
© 2008 Boxcar Media LLC - All rights reserved