| TOP STORIES AROUND THE COUNTY |
 |
Barrett Kicks Off Campaign Touting Experience, AccomplishmentsBy Tammy Daniels iBerkshires Staff 02:38AM / Thursday, September 17, 2009
 Mayor John Barrett III was surrounded by supporters at his campaign kickoff Wednesday night at the American Legion. |
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Mayor John Barrett III positioned himself as the "change candidate" as he kicked of his re-election campaign on Wednesday night.
Surrounded by enthusiastic supporters — many sporting "keep the mayor the mayor" stickers — at the American Legion, the state's dean of mayors urged his backers to help him win another two years in the corner office.
"This is a very emotional time. I believe so much, so much that this election could be one of the most important elections that this city has faced in a long time," said Barrett, adding that if his opponents "want change, fine. But tell us what they want to change that we haven't already accomplished."
Barrett's served 26 years, longer than any other mayor in Massachusetts history. Most young people in the city have never known another leader — he's been handing out high school diplomas for nearly a generation. But those same youngsters don't remember when the city was a dying mill town after its biggest employer Sprague Electric, closed up shop, he said.
"I keep hearing around this country and around this city that we need change," said longtime friend and political colleague Rep. Daniel E. Bosley. You don't need to switch leaders for that, he continued, "because [Barrett] has been the agent for change .... [He has] made this city change in a good way."
Bosley introduced the mayor to crowded room that included Berkshire District Attorney David E. Capeless, City Councilors Gailanne Cariddi, Michael Bloom, Lisa Blackmer and Marie Harpin, council candidate Dennis Whitney and local leaders such as Mary Grant and James Canavan.
Barrett's facing his toughest opponent in years in City Councilor Richard Alcombright. He's touting his long experience, critical connections and accomplishment in transforming the city from mill town to arts haven as the reasons to check the box next to his name on the November ballot.
He pointed to the millions of dollars poured into roads, ball fields, the water treatment plant, library and the schools, while keeping property taxes among the lowest in the state as change for the good.
"We rebuilt this city by going back in the neighborhoods," the mayor said. "You don't rebuild a city by starting in the downtown."
The goal has been to create an attractive and, most importantly, affordable city for young families. That means good schools and enough teachers, said Barrett, a former teacher himself. Over the past two decades, the average student-teacher ratio has dropped by more than a third, students can take advantage of a range of programs, Brayton School was rebuilt and Drury High reconfigured.
"It's important we make sure we continue these programs," said Barrett. "But we also want to make it affordable."
He rejected notions that the downtown isn't prospering, pointing to the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art as a cornerstone and the development of condominiums and small businesses on Main Street, along with redevelopment of the former Kmart building.
Who would have thought people would pay more than $300,000 to buy condos on Main Street? he asked. The city under his administration has sponsored the annual Beach Party, Downtown Celebration and Food Festival. It's also saved state properties like the armory and the skating rink.
But there's still more to do: additions to two of the elementary schools, which are now K-7, more road work and some $3.2 million in streetscape improvements to the city's main entrances made available by the late U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy.
"Yes, there's been some decisions along the way that have offended some people," he said. "But that's the job of the mayor. A mayor has to be many things to many people. He cannot, or she cannot, be the person who sits on the bus. That mayor has to drive the bus but make sure there's people sitting on the bus with him or her."
The city is facing dire years ahead, said Barrett, as the state economy continues to founder. "We face the toughest challenge ahead, even more than Proposition 2 1/2 ... We lost $2.8 million [in state aid] and the next two years are going to be more difficult."
The connections he's made over his career — he and Boston's Menino were the only mayors invited to Kennedy's funeral — will be critical to keeping North Adams in the loop, he said. "At least when I make a call to Boston or Washington, they take the call."
He acknowledged this election will be hard fought and that his experience could be held against him as well.
"It's going to be a tough one because I'm running on a record of making tough decisions, 26 years of having to say no to people when they wanted me to say yes, 26 years of sometimes having to say to the union leadership, 'no, we can't afford it.'" He thanked his supporters for never wavering in their faith in him over the years and asked them to stick with him again.
"I need you one more time. I cannot tell you how important the next two years are," Barrett said to applause. "I hope that in two years, we can say we done the job and we done it well." |
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary. Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com |
Ms. Daniels, you don't say how many people were in attendance. Transcript has it at "hundreds".
I count approximately 80-100 people in the room from your leading photo.
What is your estimate of the number of people in attendance at this event?
Editor: At least a couple hundred is probably right. I tend to be like the National Park Service when it comes to estimating (avoiding it) because I got in trouble once for seriously underestimating an event. I freely admit I'm not good at it; I count as much as possible but sometimes that's hard to do. There was a steady stream of people entering the hall for more than 30 minutes and he had a lot more than Ruberto did for his kick off. | | from: attendance | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
And ... did the Mayor really say "we done the job and we done it well" ?
Editor: Yes. I took it as a play on the term "yah, done good." Phrases that sound good talking don't always translate well in writing. | | from: attendance | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Waiting for your coverage of the two Alcombright Events that drew 3-4 times as many people. I know you USED to work at The Transcript, but hopefully you can avoid the blatant appearance of pro-Barrett bias.
Editor: I have neither the time nor manpower (nor inclination) to cover every campaign fundraiser in two cities. We covered Mr. Alcombright's announcements and one event. This was the mayor's campaign kickoff and so deserved coverage. | | from: Insight | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
"He rejected notions that the downtown isn't prospering"
This is what I don't understand. He doesn't even admit there IS a problem... so he is not even trying to fix it. No wonder Main Street is lined with signs for his opponent.
I don't get how he can keep saying everything is great around here. He touts the schools student to teacher ratio. That's simply because North Adams gets up to $10M a year in state aid for the schools. Student to teacher ratio means nothing if the schools fail in pretty much every performance category. Take a look for yourself:
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/ayp/ayp_report/district.aspx?linkid=30&orgtypecode=5&fycode=2009&orgcode=02090000&ayp_report_mode=DETAILED
Yet in his campaign literature, he says our schools are "are among the best in the Commonwealth." Once again, he doesn't even admit that there is a problem.
This scares me. I would hope our leader would be on top of these issues, and would be big enough to admit when it isn't working. | | from: Church Street Resident | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| estimate would be like 250 to 300 people.....i was their | | from: i was their | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
To answer the question of how many people attended the kick off, the room was packed early on, I took a quick count, the total of the night was well in excess of 1000 persons. Cars were lines up all over.
John Barrett has made some enemies in his 26 years as Mayor as he had to do what he was hired to do. He had to enforce rules, regulations that slum lords didn’t and still don’t appreciate. He has had to say no to projects that were not in compliance with regulations and he had to say no to unions that what big raises every three years that the city cannot afford. If Mr. Alcomebright should ever get in he will soon find out that one cannot be nice to people that he has to say no too as if he does then they walk all over him and the property owners of this city will pay dearly as will the elderly who are trying to stay in their homes.
John has down well and now needs the support of the many, this time more than ever before.
| | from: Many ar the Mayors kick off | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
NOBODY believes that there were over a thousand persons at this event. General consensus seems to be 200-300. Can't quite understand why you would deliberately write such outlandish statements. Shows a lack of confidence, like a guy who brags about the size of his one-eyed dolly.
I hope you aren't trying to help Mayor Barrett with these blatant lies, because you are instead reinforcing what so many people already suspect. That Barrett is running scared, and is using whatever means, WHATEVER MEANS left at his disposal to win this race. Honest or otherwise.
Very telling, indeed.
It's so transparent. It's so entertaining.
| | from: attendance | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
You, below me, are sooooo angry. It's going to be hard for you, when your candidate loses.
I was there, from the start to the finish. In total close to a 1000 people went through that door. Not everyone stayed, but a 1000 stopped in to show their support.
What you don't understand, like when Paul ran, is that there are a lot more supporters than you think. We will come out in droves to support JBIII.
Lawn signs don't vote.
| | from: wow | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Droves, huh? Well, then! If they're anything like the "well in excess of 1000", in a "quick count"... You might be right about one thing.
It's gonna be a whoopin'. | | from: attendance | on: 09-17-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| In all the photos around of this event, I see one face that is under the age of 50. | | from: anon | on: 09-18-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Still like to shout your answers, I see.
Seems hypocritical of someone that seems to complain so often about the Mayor's so called temper.
It's okay though. I can understand your frustrations as it's obvious your voting solely because of a personal dislike towards the Mayor. You, as well as those silly fools that post on Topix (and I know which one you are)try so hard to launch your own 'whisper campaign'. It won't work.
There will be a day when you (disgruntled former city employee), or you (slum lord) will finally leave the city we love.
A vote for John is a vote for an even better town than what him, and his administration have built over the years ( that includes Dick). Dick's time will come, it just won't be this election.
Voters, now is not the time to change. We NEED someone that has a direct line to Boston, and Washington.
Newbies can't pull this off. They do not have the clout yet. Maybe the other candidate should be working on this now, for an election two years from now, but lets not get him in there, to 'try it out'. Not the time.
Don't let your future suffer. It's not worth it to try someone new, just because.
| | from: hmm | on: 09-18-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Your one-sided reporting is so blatant it is laughable!! A lengthy article with 4 pix compared to barely a half page w/o pix. Pathetic!! | | from: | on: 09-18-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Please keep it balanced!!! | | from: What? | on: 09-18-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Dear Editor:
Don't in any way shape or form, feel any sense of obligation to justify your editorial actions to anyone that posts here. That would include me. I only ask one favor......
Kindly turn on the Buffoon Filter | | from: Tech Support | on: 09-18-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Dear Editor:
Please remove the comment from "anon" about people 50 years and older as it ageism. I would hope you would no sooner allow a comment that is racist. Of course, if the Buffoon Filter had been activated, the comment would have never have been posted. Please turn on the filter as I tend to believe that "anon" has no idea what "ageism" or even how the spell it. Time to add some Clorox to the gene pool. | | from: Tech Support | on: 09-18-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
I didn't know there was anything wrong with being 50 or older. It is like discrimintating against people who are stupid. If we did, we would take computers away from them and not let them post their parochial, one dimensional missives on this site. For more information on words containing more than one syllable, please see dictionary.com
(By the way-that is how you spell "crier", it is not "cryer") | | from: Town Crier | on: 09-18-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
What's more evident of age discrimination = pointing out that there is a dearth of diversity of any kind in the cluster of Barrett supporters in the photos, or the policies and personalities that create the dynamic where few people in their "child raising years" (is that polite enough for you?) appear to support John Barrett?
The only ageism I see in these comments is people assuming that I am under 50. | | from: anon | on: 09-19-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Anybody know if the debate this wednesday night will be televised?
Editor: I believe NBCTV is going to televise it. | | from: lefty | on: 09-28-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
|
Advertise on iBerkshires.com

|