Election 2009: Lamarre Details Stance as Councilor

Print Story | Email Story
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — I am David Lamarre, a candidate for North Adams City Council. I'd like to share some thoughts on how I see the City Council's role and provide some insight into how I'll approach my responsibilities as a councilor.

Remembering that the strength of a community is found in its citizens, not its government, I believe that the City Council should serve to keep the wires of government and the people tightly connected. As a city councilor, I will work in collaboration with the mayor, councilors, community groups, businesses and individual citizens on urgent issues, routine council business and community initiatives.

These four steps — thinking independently, listening attentively, debating respectfully and acting collectively — are my framework for navigating the sometimes choppy waters of local government. I will make them the hallmark of my service to North Adams.

City councilors have a responsibility to think independently and avoid influences that may shortchange the process or ensure a predetermined outcome. Thinking independently requires confidence with a balance of creativity, perspective and experience, important elements to building a foundation for collaboration. Each of us bringing our own thoughts to the process of government enables the city council to draw from a deeper well of imagination and expertise. Without independent thinkers we risk missing the opportunities of fresh ideas, creativity is stifled, experience discounted and perspective unbalanced. Independent thinkers inspire spirited debate, challenging the status quo. 

We should listen attentively to a variety of points of view and adjust our own thinking to incorporate ideas that will help us achieve the best results. I've often found that when I talk less and listen more I get greater satisfaction from the results of a collective effort. Having given others the opportunity to be heard helps me formulate a more informed opinion and channels my decision making process in a positive way.

That doesn't mean that I'm shy about speaking up. It means that the better I listen the more thoughtful, concise, and meaningful my position is when I do speak. You can't begin a discussion by shutting out opposing points of view and hope to move toward a fully informed decision.

Public debate is the filter that clarifies issues and validates actions. A councilor should debate respectfully while pushing others to present thoughtful positions. Debating respectfully requires setting aside egos and political gamesmanship in favor of reaching the best outcomes. There is nothing like a good and fair argument to affect a positive conclusion. In the end everyone feels like they were a part of the process, their opinions were valued and they're gratified from the effort.

For my part, I'll argue for my positions and can hold tightly to a conclusion. I'm not afraid to be the odd man out or the dissenting opinion on a hot -button issue because compromising principles, values or ethics is a bitter option. The important thing is that government representatives and the people of North Adams trust the process and look ahead optimistically, assured that we're all doing our best to govern in a way that delivers maximum benefit for our city.

To act collectively, as civic leaders, is the last step. Acting collectively means that leadership doesn't end with the council vote. This is where the hard work truly begins. Acting collectively to advance our mutual interests becomes the responsibility of all councilors, no matter where we stood on the issue at the outset. To do otherwise forces a return to the status quo, is not respectful of the process and undermines our progress. Follow through to implementation and conclusion is essential, otherwise we risk that all the thinking, listening and debating has been for nothing.

Thank you for considering my point of view. Cast a vote for civic pride by casting a vote for me, David Lamarre, on Tuesday, Nov. 3.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Cost, Access to NBCTC High Among Concerns North Berkshire Residents

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff

Adams Select Chair Christine Hoyt, NBCTC Executive Director David Fabiano and William Solomon, the attorney representing the four communities, talk after the session. 
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Public access channels should be supported and made more available to the public — and not be subject to a charge.
 
More than three dozen community members in-person and online attended the public hearing  Wednesday on public access and service from Spectrum/Charter Communications. The session at City Hall was held for residents in Adams, Cheshire, Clarksburg and North Adams to express their concerns to Spectrum ahead of another 10-year contract that starts in October.
 
Listening via Zoom but not speaking was Jennifer Young, director state government affairs at Charter.
 
One speaker after another conveyed how critical local access television is to the community and emphasized the need for affordable and reliable services, particularly for vulnerable populations like the elderly. 
 
"I don't know if everybody else feels the same way but they have a monopoly," said Clarksburg resident David Emery. "They control everything we do because there's nobody else to go to. You're stuck with with them."
 
Public access television, like the 30-year-old Northern Berkshire Community Television, is funded by cable television companies through franchise fees, member fees, grants and contributions.
 
Spectrum is the only cable provider in the region and while residents can shift to satellite providers or streaming, Northern Berkshire Community Television is not available on those alternatives and they may not be easy for some to navigate. For instance, the Spectrum app is available on smart televisions but it doesn't include PEG, the public, educational and governmental channels provided by NBCTC. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories