| TOP STORIES AROUND THE COUNTY |
Clarksburg Talks Burglary12:46AM / Thursday, November 19, 2009
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — More than 30 residents packed into the Selectmen's meeting on Wednesday night to find out more about the investigation into a half-dozen break-ins here and in nearby Stamford, Vt.
The arrest of a suspect in a rash of burglaries stretching from Southern Vermont to South County has calmed some fears but residents are continuing their crime watch with the support of town officials and police. Read More ....
|
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary. Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com |
According to the article in transcript and eagle, he isn'accused of theft in Clarksburg - or Stamford!
..."In the Berkshires, Veremko is suspected of house breaks in Pittsfield, North Adams, Lanesborough, Dalton, Richmond, Hancock and Williamstown, according to law enforcement officials."...
This guy has been a busy little beaver in other towns, but he isn't associated with the break-ins around your area (unless they think Clarksburg is part of North Adams!)...if he has stuff from your homes in his possession, there would have to be a buddy of his still out there though...
I've never read a description of your 'guy'... care to share it?
Editor: He is connected to two or more break-ins in Clarksburg. | | from: Hoya | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
The desription in Clarksburg is a tall, thin white male. 22-26. Short brown hair, black hooded sweatshirt, big baggy jeans and sneakers.
He was witnessed coming and going through the woods. Doesn't match the Veremko arrest and to my knowledge the Lenox guy may be linked to Clarksburg but has NOT been charged in any of the cases yet. The Clarksburg Police are urging the public to stay alert and be vigilant. That kind of tells you what you need to know. I did read that the Lenox guy was charged with "receiving stolen property". Again, you have to read between the lines here as the police won't tell the public very much. If I lived in Clarksburg, I'd be very concerned. Generally it's a drug addict and he isn't going to kick the habit because he might get caught in a B&E. | | from: Watching in My Town Too | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Seeing how they haven't charged the bum in Lenox arrest for any of the Clarksburg cases I'd suggest they look for a local drug addict who knows the area. If he's on foot and coming and going through wooded areas than chances are he is a local person and most likely already well known to the cops.
Perhaps they can use the same "probable cause" that Lenox used to bring in a person who matches the description and is known the cops. See if they have an alibi that matches up for the times when these poor residents were broken into. Guess you'd call that being proactive.
Editor: Who says he's not being charged for the Clarksburg break-ins? Police agencies and the DA's office are working to charge him with a whole lot of stuff. There's been some confusion because the Lenox press release left out Clarksburg among the towns hit by break-ins even though Chief Williams has been among the lead investigators. | | from: Ya Think | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| So selectman if you are in full support of the Community Crime Watch. How are you going to support it? Are you going to buy us signs? Are you going to put flyers in our tax bills to alert us. What is your part in helping out? | | from: The townies | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
I know that I don't feel any better after last night's meeting. Basically we were told we might have something, there might be a connection, we may have a break......but watch out, they are still out there!
Editor: What he said was there was an arrest and possibly more coming on THESE break-ins. That doesn't stop somebody else with no connection to these people from doing it. | | from: Middle Roader | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I'm hoping that they can round up these other connections asap. The town residents are very uneasy with the "wait and see" approach, the cops hoping for a break like Lenox got. | | from: Hoping | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Exactly editor. So what is the town doing to prevent other people from doing B&E's? Oh yeah, that's right, they asked the citizens to protect themselves.
Editor: Well, what do you want them to do? This is your town, your government, your taxes. But consider this: There's more than 500 homes in Clarksburg but four break-ins (less than 1 percent). Two are definitely linked to a suspect in custody, the third may be (along with another one from months ago). The fourth appears to be a completely different situation.
So you've got three break-ins, an arrest and hot leads on accomplices.
I'm all for holding town officials' feet to the fire but just yelling "do something" isn't constructive. And how do they PREVENT future break-ins? Put a cop at every house? | | from: Middle Roader | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| FYI- When I was driving home from the Selectmen's meeting last night I saw the cops sitting on Middle Road by the school trying to catch speeders. Perhaps they think the B&E guy go would go speeding by. | | from: Time Traveler | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
If the Town of Clarksburg is so supportive of the Community Watch program, why did they NOT return the 2 request calls to reserve a meeting space at The Clarksburg Town Hall? Why do we all have to drive to Stamford to meet up there?
FYI- I heard that the next Stamford/Clarksburg Community Watch meeting is scheduled for December 5th in Stamford. I will be there! It is time to get organized and hear the information. | | from: hun? | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Per Time Travelers post, I don't feel that sitting by the school is doing much to prevent anything. A police car driving around sounds like a good place to start. Regarding taxes editor, they are incredibly high compared to services provided.
Editor: I live in Stamford. I know from taxes vs. services. | | from: Middle Roader | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| How about a camera set up at Cross Rd and Middle Rd, where all the suspicious stuff seems to pass through? Can the town do that for us? | | from: Idea Man | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Hey Idea Man, the town cant do that. Probbaly an evasion of privicy. Have to protect the rights of criminals, that is important.
Editor: They probably could, if the taxpayers were willing to pay for it. But what would it prove? That somebody walked or drove through the intersection? That's not a crime. And what happens when a break-in occurs on the other side of town? | | from: Micheal C | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Dear Editor: Re:Taxes Plus in Clarksburg we got a bonus this year. The residents who do pay their sewer bills were rewarded by helping to pay for all the people who don't. Isn't that wonderful? No worries, the board promised it's only a one time thing. Ha! And then you wonder why we have no faith in the Selectmen. Go figure.
Editor: Well, the state ordered that not the Selectmen, who incidentally don't have much control over how the taxes are collected. That's another town official. | | from: Middle Roader | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
So what CAN the Town Of Clarksburg do for us?
NOTHING???? Nothing at all? | | from: Idea Man | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Editor: You all do know you can also comment on the story posting here, right? It's set up so you can reply to each other faster. Rules still the same: no name-calling, slander or threats. | | from: | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Dear Editor: I know the sewer issue is seperate from this one, however, what the selectmen DID have control over was posting the names of the residents who DIDN'T pay their sewer bills so that everyone else could pick up the tab. That is a fact. That list should have been made public, it is a public record. I'm hoping the town residents don't mind picking up my tab for sewer this year because I think it's my turn to take a year off.
Editor: The list is public. You could have gone down to Town Hall and seen it anytime. The threat of posting made a lot of people pay up, which was the whole point. Of course, townspeople can always petition to have any delinquencies published in the media. | | from: Middle Roader | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
I'd rather pay higher taxes for police and fire protection. If people aren't happy with town government vote them out at election time. You can start wit the high and mighty Selectwoman M's Lefave
Editor: I was at town meeting when several residents suggested raising taxes to prevent town workers from being furloughed. They were decisively voted down. You can vote out the board but it won't make any difference if voters won't approve higher taxes. | | from: ski bumb | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Couldnt the board just put flyers in the next tax bill that alerts residents to the recent breakins and how to protect thier homes????
It is the LEAST they could do.
Why not!? | | from: huh | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Buck up people! Look at yourselves crying for the government to do something. How quickly you are willing to pay higher taxes, give up your privacy for public surveillance, and request unlawful searches.
How about taking a little responsibility for your own safety? Before you shell out more money for hit and miss police coverage, printing fliers, or driving all over the neighborhood causing more confusion - maybe you should consider something like this
http://www.spygearco.com/MiniVersaSpyCameraUSB-PE.htm
or some of the similar services from companies like ADT.
I keep the shotgun loaded, but for when I'm not home, this is the route I trust more than a chance sighting by police or crime watch.
Editor: nevermind | | from: Stamford Vigilante | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I take full responsibility for the protection of my family or I should say Mr Glock does. But I do believe a change in town leadership is long overdo | | from: ski bumb | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| It seems to me that the residents of Clarksburg need to take responsibility for themselves and not expect the Police Department or the Selectmen to solve all their problems. Even with an increased police presence, burglaries will happen. Drug users are desperate and they are careless. If residents paid attention to the happenings in their own neighborhoods,this thief would have been caught much sooner. My only criticism is that I wish we were informed sooner so that we could have been more diligent in watching our neighborhoods. I honestly don't think that a Neighborhood Watch program, that involves a coordinated effort on the part of residents to commit to a specific time and patrol a given area, will work in such a rural setting. Again, we do need to take responsibility for ourselves and work WITH the police and selectmen, both of whom have been criticized unfairly. Let's stop putting the blame on anyone other than the culprit and pay attention to what's happening around us. | | from: Long time resident | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I keep hearing more rumors that there are attempts at houses on Pine Dr. and Hudson Brook Rd. that happened after Stefan was arrested. Must not be OUR guy? Our guy is busy during the day it seems 11-3PM. We need to be on the look-out. | | from: well,well,well | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
When the editor of iberkshires states that the "Stamford Vigilante" poster is their "new boy/girl friend"-it is totally inappropriate and makes me lose respect for their site. Especially since the poster stated that he waits with his shotgun loaded. What BS- I would think an editor would be more intelligent and less biased. I live in Stamford and have found all of these vigilante comments disturbing. You do understand that there is a difference between vigilant-on the alert and vigilante-somebody who punishes lawbreakers personally rather than relying on the legal authorities? Maybe you could get a posse and hang people before the law gets them. I already know the editor is not going to agree with me. This is what I have learned from posters-anyone who looks different, has a junky car, a tattoo, is looking for a dog or is not recognized by some local is suspect. How about getting a life- If our houses are robbed it is a terrible thing but some of these comments are just so reactionary.
Editor: Just a joke. Jeesh. I take it back (sorry Vigilante). Vigilante and I have disagreed on the gun thing on another story but I agree with comment on people's seeming willingness to give up their privacy and grant unlawful search and seizure for security. That's all. I don't believe in vigilantism - and I don't get that Vigilante does either. But I'll let Vigilante talk for him- or herself. | | from: shocked | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
When the editor of iberkshires states that the "Stamford Vigilante" poster is their "new boy/girl friend"-it is totally inappropriate and makes me lose respect for their site. Especially since the poster stated that he waits with his shotgun loaded. What BS- I would think an editor would be more intelligent and less biased. I live in Stamford and have found all of these vigilante comments disturbing. You do understand that there is a difference between vigilant-on the alert and vigilante-somebody who punishes lawbreakers personally rather than relying on the legal authorities? Maybe you could get a posse and hang people before the law gets them. I already know the editor is not going to agree with me. This is what I have learned from posters-anyone who looks different, has a junky car, a tattoo, is looking for a dog or is not recognized by some local is suspect. How about getting a life- If our houses are robbed it is a terrible thing but some of these comments are just so reactionary.
Don't take is personal Editor, this post is from the "I don't mind if someone breaks into my home and steals all my possesions, but if someone is speeding up my road and hurts my prescious doggie, I'll kill them" Hahahahahaha Talk about needing to get a life! | | from: | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I take it "Long Time Resident" is a selectmen in disguise. Real tough to figure that one out. | | from: Benji | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| The guy arrested is not the only one that did Clarksburg.Pay attention. Keep you eye out. Clarksburg PD has not made an arrest. Protect your homes. Call in any suspicious guy cutting through yards and into the woods on foot. You towns people need to smarten up! | | from: info | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I cant tell you how I know... but your guy is still in Clarksburg looking for an empty house and walking through the woods and cutting thru your yards. I wouldnt want to ruin the CPD case, but no point of all of you being ignorant. There needs to be an arrest made in this town. They havent got them all yet. Stay watchful. Be smart. If something doesnt look right... it probably isnt. | | from: | on: 11-19-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Looks like the Wilson's made The Eagle. That is JUST one house...but the others are not solved. Don't let your guard down. | | from: | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
I have heard the same things as the last post. Wilson's is obvious as it's in the Eagle, and perhaps 1 other break-in can be linked to this guy. However, the CPD have to be able to put together enough evidence to charge him with the actual break-in otherwise he'll only get charged with receiving stolen property for those. We'll see what he gets charged with.
Regarding some of the other break-ins, I understand that those were not done by the Veremko guy. The descriptions and the manner of the break-ins don't match.
It's pretty obvious that the Clarksburglar is still out there and looking for an unoccupied house to steal from. Keep an eye out for yourself and your neighbors and call 911 when something doesn't look right. It's about the only thing we can do.
One thing is for sure, these morons who do this all end up getting caught sooner or later. Look at the genious in Lenox arrest, not exactly the smartest guy you'll ever meet. The Clarksburglar is the same. He's a dope. The reason these small town guys end up stealing is because they are idiots who can't earn an honest living with their pea-sized brains. Add in a drug addiction to a brain that already doesn't function very well and you have a common petty thief who steals from intelligent hard-working people. It's always been that way. No matter how many get caught, the next loser is right there to try his luck. Better hope the Clarksburglar doesn't pick the wrong house with a homeowner prepared for him. His luck may really run out, for good! | | from: Me too | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Thanks me Too. There were two calls to police yesterday afternoon of a suspicious person heading into the woods on Middle Road just over the NA line and again on Cross Road down by the fire station. He's not done yet folks. All of these calls to Police are making his life harder but he has nothing else to do but to keep trying. | | from: Remington Arms | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| This is getting crazy. Mike Williams is working his butt off for you people. Cut him some slack, and as far as Deb LeFave goes think about it. She makes $1,000 or less each year to deal with everything. I think she deserves a lot of credit sticking it out this long. Help make positive changes. We look like a bunch of rednecks to everyone reading this. | | from: Someone who Cares | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Dear Someone Who Cares,
Finally we hear from the selectmen! Woo-Ray! | | from: Cyrus | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
To Shocked - Just to be clear, I don't sit and wait with my shotgun loaded. I go about my normal day, with my shotgun loaded. I have no intention of targeting anyone outside of my home BUT if they enter my home against my will - I will take matters into my own hands. Now you can read into that last bit whatever you want. I am a law abiding citizen and will remain that, but I do know what my rights are.
My point was, and is, people need to learn how to take care of their own and stop crying that the underfunded, over-worked police need to do more. | | from: Stamford Vigilante | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Ive got pitch forks and torches whos got the rope? come on people tell the police what you see but you dont need to plaster it here. what were the people heading into the woods guilty of getting fresh air! | | from: | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
No wonder people are confused, just look at some of the posts here.
In one comment they tell you to get off your butts and help yourself, not to depend on the overworked and underpaid town officials. Then when townspeople do just that they post another comment about not taking thengs ionto your owns hands, let the police handle these things.
Which is it? Just for the record I vote for people helping each other. Even the Town Selectmen thought the neighborhood watch is a great idea, and they are taking a lot of heat on the issue. It seems like the watch is off to a good start, lots of concerned citizens. I hope they can keep it going! | | from: November's Child | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I agree. Get yourselves some guns up here. Williams works as hard as he can. He is only 1 man who can only do so much. If you are sick of this guy breaking houses and robbing your community every year- then do something about it. I agree with arming yourself. This guy should know this is the wrong town. Pick another town. We have every right to fight to get our freedom and security and power back. He stole it from us enough. We need to do what we can within the law and our rights. I think it is ridiculous that criminals are getting more rights than us. | | from: Agree | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| That guy had on the black hoodie and match the description - I hear. I think it is suspicious if someone walks up your driveway to cut thru your back yard -dont you? If not .. tell me where you live and I will allow for that type of thing to happen at your house. The Neighborhood Watch is in full effect. I make NO APOLOGIES. Clarksburg residents are doing the RIGHT thing. Residents DO NOT ever question your gut instincts, no matter what that guy writes. We appreciate your call. | | from: | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I'm with you. Williams is a great guy who is doing all that one person can do. He's trying, lets help him out. | | from: Agree With Agree | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
in response to
"Don't take is personal Editor, this post is from the "I don't mind if someone breaks into my home and steals all my possesions, but if someone is speeding up my road and hurts my prescious doggie, I'll kill them" Hahahahahaha Talk about needing to get a life!"
I never said I would kill someone who hurts a dog, I don't even have a dog. I have had pets killed by cars and it is traumatic for the driver and pet owner-but it never was intentional... I also never said I didn't care if someone breaks into my home, believe it or not just because you don't own a gun and want to kill an intruder doesn't mean you want your house broken into. Can you hold those 2 opposing thoughts in your mind at the same time? I am against loaded guns for safety reasons-I don't think this is unheard of among responsible gun owners. I don't get all excited about hunting for "dirtbags" either, I want people punished in a legal way. Meanwhile we will have to agree to disagree about handling a criminal break in. However, Speeding on my little back road will continue to be a problem long after this criminal is locked up and if a child is killed by a speeding car it will be an avoidable tragedy and much worse to that child's family than any amount of money stolen in a break in.
| | from: Really? | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Did anyone see the guy rolling a suitcase through town today at 330PM? He looked suspicious. His black hoodie was unzipped and not over his head tho. Wondering if anyone else saw him and found that strange? | | from: wondering | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| No I didn't see it, but if you did and you thought it to be suspicious, then you should call the police. | | from: concerned | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I think the police were called. | | from: | on: 11-20-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Another week, another lack of a Clarksburg arrest. Thankfully, the Lenox Police were able to make one to help solve two of our cases. | | from: ZZZZZZ | on: 11-21-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| My kids saw the guy with the suitcase when they got of their bus. They called me I told them to call Clarksburg Police. They got the answering machine. I told them call 911. They did and they were told they were the 3rd call on the same person. | | from: SCResident | on: 11-21-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Good work Clarksburg resdients. Hey...not sure if the police ever followed up on this.... but there was a call on Thursday with a person who match the description of one of the breakins in their back yard at around 330PM in the middle of town. | | from: | on: 11-21-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Hey, does anyone know when the next Stamford/Clarksburg Community Watch meeting is???? | | from: | on: 11-21-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Important Update: There is a report that Elvis has left the building. The "Suspicious Fellow" reportedly has left town. God help them wherever he lands. Good riddence Clarksburglar....for now. If and when you come back, we will know and we'll be ready and waiting for you. | | from: Benji | on: 11-22-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I heard that everyone should save the date as December 5th. (daytime) | | from: info | on: 11-23-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| It sure has been quiet the past 3 days.... maybe he DID leave afterall.... No sightings. | | from: | on: 11-23-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
How do we know this kid has left town? Did his mother tell someone that? ... I really hope Elvis has left the building because I think we could all use a little piece of mind knowing things are back to normal. We should always remember to keep our eyes open for abnormal activity though. Never put your guard down.
Editor: This comment has been edited because of unproven allegations. There's been a rush to judgment on an individual with absolutely no credible evidence and it's reaching the level of harassment. I caution posters to think twice before commenting. | | from: concerned citizen | on: 11-23-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Apparently Vt Police feel satified
http://www.thetranscript.com/ci_13854849 | | from: Stamford Vigilante | on: 11-24-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Editor.... you have no idea how much WE KNOW and how much evidence we actually DO have. None of us would jump to conclusions. We have not only common sense - we have facts. We are good town's people with families. None of us would like to be falsely blamed. We have been on very good considering.....
Editor: Yes, you've been patient and most comments have been very circumspect on identifying the individual. Thank you for that. The comment in question, however, cast aspersions on a family member and I felt that was going to far. | | from: Info | on: 11-24-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| The police can be satisfied ... whatever .. but you WONT shut up the people that live in Stamford who did not find thier things in Lenox and have not had their cases solved with the latest arrest. Stamford residents have their guns ready and are keeping an eye out for each other. | | from: Info | on: 11-24-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| The Selectmen in Clarksburg (and perhaps Stamford) would like all the townspeople to believe that the person arrested by LENOX POLICE is responsible for all of the recent break-ins. That is just not true. I understand their desire to calm fears and to paint other residients who know a lot more than they can possibly share as crazy vigilantes. That is not fair. I read one comment that a resident was "satisfied" with the arrest and he was now comfortable locking his door and getting back to life as normal. Good luck with all that. All of the homes broken into had their doors securely locked and in some cases a dog close by. The facts are Veremko will be charged with 1 Stamford break-in and perhaps 2 in Clarksburg. That's it folks. That means the person who is responsible for the other 3-4 break-ins in Stamford and 2 of the most recent ones in Clarksburg is still out there walking around. Reports of some Elvis-type person leaving the building shouldn't let anyones guard down. I'm sure he hasn't gone very far, and they always return. They need to be caught, not moved to another area to continue their crimes. The Editor should interview the local police and see if they have any other suspects or if the buy into the theory that Veremko did them all, I think they'd be very surprised. | | from: In The Know | on: 11-25-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Ok, did a convicted criminal just move back to Stamford? (Who did these types of crimes in the past?) I heard someone just got out of jail? Is this true or false? | | from: Question | on: 11-25-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| That's right! we are not stupid people. And yes, I do live in Stamford and I WILL have my gun ready if and when this lowlife, druggie dirtbag decides to visit my house or my neighborhood. I work TOO HARD for my things to let someone walk in and help themselves!! If I am being too harsh for the editor. OH WELL!! | | from: concerned citizen | on: 11-25-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I think the Neighborhood Watch is working! Everyone should come to the next meeting. | | from: Info | on: 11-25-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| When and where is the next meeting? | | from: Question | on: 11-26-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Members are working on organizing a meeting for December 12th. | | from: Info | on: 11-28-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Four break-ins/attempted break-ins in NA. All doen during the day. Sounds familiar. | | from: CCR | on: 12-07-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
|
Advertise on iBerkshires.com
|
