| TOP STORIES AROUND THE COUNTY |
 |
Recount Countdown in North AdamsStaff reports
iBerkshires
03:01PM / Saturday, November 21, 2009
David Lamarre and Keith Bona, both at left, wait for a decision on a challenged ballot on Saturday at City Hall. |
Update Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009: Keith Bona, who was behind by three votes to newcomer David Lamarre, picked up enough after Saturday's recount to secure the ninth seat on the City Council. Bona was returned to the council by a mere two votes: 2,448 to 2,446.
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Election officials began the recount of City Council ballots at 9 a.m. this morning but there's no guarantee the ninth city councilor will be determined by Saturday's end.
"We should have the ballots counted but I don't know if we'll have the [vote] tally," said City Clerk Marilyn Gomeau at about 2:30 p.m. If not, Gomeau said the counting will begin again on Sunday. "I don't want to look at this on Monday."
Poll workers were steadily making their way through more than 5,000 ballots today to determine the placement of candidates David Lamarre and Keith Bona. Lamarre lead former council member Bona by only three votes in the Nov. 3 general election, prompting Bona to call for a recount.
This is the first time in a decade that the city's done a recount. That recount saw Bona drop from eighth to ninth and hang onto his seat by a single vote.
This past election saw seven incumbents and eight challengers vie for the nine council seats. Of the incumbents, only Robert M. Moulton Jr. lost his seat and newcomers David Bond and Michael Boland were elected.
Election officials were working in teams of two — one reading off names and the other marking them on a control sheet — on packets of 50 ballots at a time. Counters were toting up the control sheets as they were completed. Challenged votes meant a huddle with Gomeau, members of the Board of Registrar of Voters and the candidates.
While the election ballots had been screened by machine during the election, the recount had to done either completely by hand or completely by machine. The issue has been whether the machines correctly identified marked ballots. If the circle beside a name was not completely filled in, the machine may not have registered it. More than 11,000 "blanks" had been registered in the election.
 Election officials read off the ballots. Right, packets of ballots ready to be counted. |
Of course the opposite is true, too. Bona said he lost one vote that the machine had recorded but which the Board Registrars rejected: "It was a pencil mark right in the middle of the circle."
Both Bona and Lamarre were keeping a close eye on the count, along with a number of other observors including Councilors Lisa Blackmer, Gailanne Cariddi and Marie Harpin. All the City Council votes have to be recounted since the top nine vote-getters are elected.
Bona said it was difficult to determine who was ahead or behind at this point because both had gained and lost votes.
Gomeau praised the dedication and professionalism of the election workers.
"These people are fantastic," she said. "Without them this would never be able to take place." |
| Reading this led me to wonder how accurate any election results are. | | from: tess | on: 11-21-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| We bought the election machines thinking we would have an accurate count. How silly are we. I am wondering if any other candidate was affected by the recount. | | from: | on: 11-22-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| If anyone had the opportunity to witness the recount, they will now have a better understanding of the elction process. It proved the machines are accurate, it's the inaccurate markings placed on the ballots that make the votes uncountable by the machine, but it is very evident that the machine only will read what is properly marked on the ballot. My hats go off to all the wonderful workers who worked so very hard and never complained. To the two canidates in question my, you are both truely gentleman.It shows it is truly the Democratic way. | | from: City Clerk | on: 11-22-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I have never been part of an election process (other than as a voter) but honestly, my reaction is that this story proves how ACCURATE the machines are. The variance was exceedingly small and could easily be explained by any number of HUMAN errors (including that of the voters themselves). | | from: EK-NorthAdams | on: 11-23-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Now that we have a new mayor maybe the City Clerk will not be such a grump and talk to people with respect in her office. | | from: Clerk | on: 11-23-2009 12:00AM
I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
|
Advertise on iBerkshires.com
|
