| TOP STORIES AROUND THE COUNTY |
An artist's rendering of the proposed Walmart Super Center. |
North Adams Planners Want New England Look for WalmartBy Tammy Daniels iBerkshires Staff 12:59AM / Tuesday, January 12, 2010
 Planners Paul Senecal, left, Joseph Gniadek and Chairman Michael Leary listen to a presentation by Walmart representatives. |
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Residents may be divided on the benefits of a Walmart Super Center but they can agree one thing: It better look Colonial.
"This community has a pretty proud tradition when it comes to its larger shopping centers of demanding a New England style look ... I think the Super Stop & Shop is a classic example of that," said Planning Board Chairman Michael Leary at Monday's meeting. "We've had developers come in here with a cookie-cutter approach, for lack of a better term."
There was general agreement in the audience of nearly 60 who filled the seats and spilled out into the hallway for the first public hearing on the 160,000 square-foot slated for the city's former gravel pit on Curran Highway. More than a few were hoping to have their questions answered on environmental effects, traffic, lighting and construction.
Leary, however, limited comments to those processes under the board's purview, such as signage, materials and traffic. It didn't include philosophical debates on Walmart's policies and its effects on local business.
"The reality is this Planning Board cannot protect against competition," he said. "That would unethical and illegal as far as I'm concerned."
There was a bit of shock when the audience discovered that the Super Center was planning to be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Several questioned nighttime noise and light pollution. Councilor Keith Bona, however, noted "We've had 24-hour stores before who've slowly learned that the people in North Adams tend to go to bed early." That led Planner David Babcock to quip, "not tonight," nodding at the packed room.
Developer Ceruzzi Properties of Connecticut, operating as BVS 5401 Investors LLC, has a purchase-and-sales agreement with city to buy bought the gravel bank for the shopping center. It's already purchased the surrounding property, including the former North Adams Plaza to the south that may end up as a Lowe's Home Improvement Center. The new Walmart replaces the 15-year-old, 97,000-square-foot building at the former Coury's Drive-in.
 Anthony Israel, standing, asks a question during the public hearing. |
The Planning Board hearing on five special permits for the site is the first step on a long process that includes hearing and reviews by the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act office and the Massachusetts Highway Department, among others.
Ceruzzi was represented on Monday by local attorney Jonathan "Jay" Sabin. Mayor Richard Alcombright, who attended the hearing, had hoped a representative from Walmart would be there.
Audience members were able to express their concerns about increased traffic along secondary roads, availability of public transportation, safety issues, the size of the parking area, and the impact on wetlands and other areas.
North Adams resident Anthony Israel asked the board to request separate, independent reports on Walmart's findings and that future filings be made available in digital format to allow greater access to the citizenry. "Just to participate because it's a really big project whether you like it or not," he said.
Israel belongs to a group questioning the suitability of the megastore, which will include a grocery, but which was rebuffed in its calls for an economic impact report.
Administrative Officer Jay Green said the group was misinterpreting an ordinance that related to the effect of a development on the city's services — fire, police, public works — not its impact on the city's economy.
The developer's representatives had met with those departments on Monday afternoon; the only issue raised was the safety factor of allowing lefthand turns in and out of a South State Street entranceway, forcing traffic across four lanes.
The main entrance would be at Hodges Cross Road, taking the place where the so-called jug handle allows lefthand turns at the intersection. It would be removed in favor of a widened highway and a dedicated righthand turn from the southbound lane into the parking lot at the lights.
A traffic study that included both Walmarts (on the assumption another retail outlet will move into the older store) and inflated data from an earlier Lowe's plan found that about 540 trips (in and out) could be expected during peak times of late afternoon and evenings weekdays and about 700 during Saturday midday.
The chain's agreed to do further study on traffic impact along the Route 8 corridor up Route 116 in Adams. Its representatives have been in talks with the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, the Berkshire Regional Transit Authority, local and state agencies including Massachusetts Highway and the town of Adams relating to sewer hookup. Walmart will be responsible for all highway reconstructions, lighting and curb cuts.
A fire-supression system with a 4,000-gallon tank that's 25 feet tall and 55 feet in diameter will be installed in the rear of the building. The new store will include greater use of natural light, recycled materials and LEDs to reduce energy; native plants and trees will be used for landscaping to break up the parking lot and provide highway shielding. A rain garden is planned along with tanks to filter and disperse storm water.
 Councilor Michael Bloom makes a point to Planners Paul Hopkins and David Babcock. Fellow Councilors Keith Bona, Alan Marden, Lisa Blackmer and President Ronald Boucher listen with attorney Jay Sabin |
Architect Robert Eberts of Cross River Architects in New York thought the brand-new Walmart look was a good one. "The one thing we see is the gray box is gone, never to return, I hope," he said, displaying an artist's rendering.
But the crowd was having none of it. Planner Joseph Gniadek said he was sure he'd seen the same design in Worcester. An audience member dismissed it as "something you'd see in Arizona" and Councilor Michael Bloom wondered why there was no mountain behind it.
The board's hallmark has been an insistence on a New England look, said Bloom, who professed his support for the project — with the exception of the facade. "That picture right there looks like a stucco box that you could see anywhere in the country ... it should have a much nicer look, fitting North Adams."
Sabin said changing the roof on a building that large would be expensive and difficult, causing Leary to retort, "that's what they said in 1994." The current Walmart changed its look back then at the insistence of the board, and became a prototype for later stores.
"It's a gateway into the city. It should be something that Walmart's proud of, that North Adams is proud of having and something that would make people want to come," said Gniadek to applause from the audience.
Sabin was asked to return next month with more information on a righthand-only turn, pictures giving a better visualization on the size of the signs and the placement of parking lot islands, to work with Gniadek over more naturalizing and possible parking lot reduction and making the facade more Colonial.
 Gniadek said it was important to make the structure something to be proud of at the city's gateway. |
The hearing and public comments took up some two hours but despite worries that the meeting would get unruly (it was easily the most-attended Planning Board meeting in years) the audience was respectful of the board and followed the rules. Though one woman, who said she was neither a supporter nor an opposer, hinted that there may have been less polite comments being bandied about in the back. "I hope that we can be respectful to other people's opinions and act appropriately."
The hearing convinced Debra Benoit of North Adams that the development's a good one.
"Aside from the facade issue, I'm impressed with the detail, particularly with the traffic study, paying attention to our environment in the Berkshires, the sustainability of the building, the inclusion of a rain garden ... and I just think that it's a very good idea." |
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary. Comments are closed for this article. If you would like to contribute information on this article, e-mail us at info@iBerkshires.com |
Seems like our local officials are very talented in keeping the citizens from having any say on anything that matters. Like anyone cares what design style the new monopoly center is going to be presented in.
So much for democracy I guess.
I just wonder how much they are all getting in kickbacks for being corporate puppets.
Editor: Democracy means power rests in the people. That's why governmental bodies and officials are limited in the scope of their duties - they can't and shouldn't be making decisions outside their jurisdiction. Of course, it's easier to make nasty comments than learn how government functions. | | from: Ella | on: 01-12-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| What's this about citizens not having any say? Did you read the story? "Citizens" spoke for an hour, and will have another opportunity to do so. How is that restrictive? | | from: say again? | on: 01-12-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
HAS ANYONE WATCHED AN ADAMS SELECTMEN MEETING ON TV? IT'S EMBARRESING! THE ADAMS FAMILY, AKA, BUTLER AND HIS CRONNIES "THE SELECTMEN" SHOULD STOP WORRYING ABOUT THE PNA NOISE POLLUTION,WHO IS SMOKING WHERE AND WHEN AND FOCUS THEIR ATTENTION ON ATTRACTING TAX REVENUE INTO THIS SORRY [deleted] TOWN!
BUTLER YOU WANTED THIS JOB NOW SHOW US SOMETHING!
Editor: Besides being totally off-topic, would you please stop shouting. | | from: WATCHING NORTH ADAMS BRING IN TAX REVENUE | on: 01-12-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| How typical of people like Ella to think that any major developer who comes to North Adams is lining the pockets of city officials. The members of the Planning Board are volunteers. They are not even paid by the city, never mind any developers. Maybe Ella ought to get off her own duff and contribute to the city instead of criticizing it. | | from: typical | on: 01-12-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
I totally agree with the facade concerns. Check out these two supercenter facades:
http://www.terrapass.com/images/blogposts/wal-mart-supercenter.jpg
http://www.retailerdaily.com/uploads/wal-mart-supercenter.jpg
Judging by those pictures (both supercenters) Wal-Mart can clearly do a better job with making the architecture fit into a more traditional style.
Why they thought that monstrosity would fly in North Adams is beyond me. North Adams deserves a more architecturally appropriate facade. We aren't some backwater after all.
Editor: Here's some more. | | from: Jon | on: 01-12-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Are they serious? People are actually worried about the facade of a new Walmart building and that it look 'colonial' enough? For what?--Curran Highway? Let's be real. Has anyone actually looked at what is on Curran Hwy lately? A great deal of which is run down and just plain not nice to look at. A nice new Walmart is just what this area needs! More jobs, better access. And really? Who is worried about traffic on a highway that is already there and just a short distance from the old Walmart? I think the new one would be easier to access--and besides there are already a number of businesses at that intersection. I doubt one more with it's own turn would make a bit of difference once it's up and running. Honestly, I don't understand why anyone doesn't jump at the chance to improve North Adams and bring in more jobs. "....will the last one out please shut the lights off..." | | from: Cathy Moses | on: 01-12-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
So by your thinking, since Curran Hwy is a pit, we should keep it that way? Just because you have low standards doesn't mean the rest of us do. You might not realize it by North Adams IS BEAUTIFUL and has amazing Victorian architecture AND natural beauty. Go check out a New Jersey suburb if you don't get it...
This is a chance to try and bring Rt 8 up to par with Main Street. If the developer is willing to revise the plans to build something that we want, why on earth should we settle for a crappy box? Because we don't want to wait a month for revised plans? That would be incredibly short sighted. | | from: Pat Bekman | on: 01-12-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Response to Editor:
If democracy is power from the people than it is very logical why I suggested there is none in this case.
Request for hearing postponement so people had enough time to research the planning issues.. denied.
Request for economic impact report.. denied.
And they made it very clear they would not entertain in any way the primary thing people are worried about.
I'm not arguing that maybe the planning board has specific duties but the fact remains that the town has tried the hush this through from the beginning and has not provided a single outlet for those that have real concerns.
Instead they try to fool us with giving us a voice on a silly thing like how the front of the building looks.
They might be volunteer, but the way these volunteers seem so eager to tow the corporate line seems questionable to me and should be to you all.
But then I guess you guys are too busy getting feed pizza by Walmart to notice.
Editor: Pizza? Oh, you mean that meeting. I don't eat pizza bribes offered by superconglomerates. That would be unethical. My point was that the board cannot demand or reject things outside its purview, which relates to design and siting. They can't demand an economic impact report; it doesn't matter if the people want one or not.
Democracy lies in electing or petitioning city leaders to change the board's jurisdiction, create a new oversight board that covers economic impact or to engage in a master planning process that will allow citizen input to be expressed in formal policy.
As for the city "hushing" things up, I guess that depends on how aware you are of what's happening here. A big-box retail development's been in the works for years in that location and a Walmart or Sam's Club, along with Lowe's, have been most frequently rumored. I'm more surprised that people were surprised. | | from: Ella | on: 01-13-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
I would just like to know what are the plans for the old walmart.Another parking lot?Put in A Big Lots or Taco Bell, KFC.Just don't leave it.
Editor: You'd have to ask Walmart that. Would be a pretty big Taco Bell! | | from: Linda | on: 01-13-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Editor: I think there is some confusion about the "Economic Impact Study". My understanding is that the Planning Board requires the study but that it is relegated to defining the economic impact on city services like fire, police, health dept, etc. It is NOT a study of the impact on other retail establishments, downtown commerce, etc.
Some people are concerned with the fact that Walmart is conducting its own study and so can skew the findings in their favor. Distrust of a large corporation is probably merited given that they only answer to shareholders and a board of directors.
I don't know that it is within the board's purview to request an independent study to be certain of the potential additional burden on city services and Walmart can certainly afford to fund such a study but the board seemed satisfied with anecdotal reports from meetings held between Sabin and various city services.
Editor: You are correct. The city is defining economic impact as to how it relates to city services. I think it can call for an independent study since no study was actually done. However, if the police, fire, DPW and other department heads say there's no significant impact, it is unlikely to.
BTW, someone did raise the issue of fire coverage at the meeting. Walmart plans a pretty extensive fire suppression system, but any fire would likely mean the aid of neighboring departments. This is NOT unusual. Local departments, including North Adams, frequently request aid in fighting fires. | | from: Jon | on: 01-13-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| Are you people kidding me,you all worried about what a Super Walmart would look like or even to approve it coming to town? Anyone watching the news lately? Haiti is in ruins,its now considered the poorest country in the world with 1,000's of people dead and millions hurt..And all we have to worry about is the next best thing to happen to North Adams...WOW..Come on people stop worrying about Walmart and what it might look like..Walmart will be built like or not and it will attract many more businesses to our already empty artsie window filled downtown.. | | from: joke | on: 01-14-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| The actual city bylaw on this so-called Economic Impact Report only mandates that the developer submit a report on how the project will impact on city services. It's the developers responsibility to meet with police and fire, which they DID, and that is in the report they submitted to the city the Friday before the planners met. Those opposed have an entire month now before the next meeting to review it all they want. But to think that a developer would need to submit a report that studies how its development will impact on other businesses is just plain ridiculous. When Stop & Shop came in, did they submit a plan on how their store would close Adams Supermarket? When Staples came in, were they required to show how they would impact on the stationery store downtown? The biggest impact a new Walmart will have is on the supermarkets, and they can all compete. Price Chopper had a chance not that long ago to build a new super store where Lowe's is supposed to go. They didn't. Anyone bother asking why North County is the only section of the Berkshires without a Price Chopper super center? They built one in Pittsfield, Great Barrington and up in Bennington. And Lenox is poised for one later this year. How come the Golub clan is ignoring North Berkshire? | | from: bigger joke | on: 01-14-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
i just think cerruzzi is holdin the city of n adams hostage. you will get the lowes if u let us build the super ctr. cerruzzi questions if people will come to lowes. build it before i or someone else does....there is no other lowes around only in nearby ny state. those are jobs. the trades bring on the trades. traffic in five years i see sprawl like pittsfield. then emergency services will be stressed.this is fair warning!!!! oh yes people from the north vermont will come to oh our services will be stressed to pownal bennington
Editor: As much as I love Lowe's (Walmart? meh), turning the south end of the city into big-box sprawl is kind of depressing. Of course, the property tax revenues should help beef up our emergency services. | | from: sam restino | on: 01-16-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| The facade of a Walmart is akin to discussing the top layer of cancer cells on a growth. Think about where the money goes once it gets to China. Lets start with the thugs who run China. Google is now threatening to pull out of China because of Chinese hacking to STEAL their & our industrial, tec.& military secrets! What about the Chinese Naval build up, lead coated toys, poisoned sheet rock, substandard steel sold to the U.S. for the S.F. bay bridge. There is a COST to "saving". | | from: Dave | on: 01-18-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
| I was born and raised in North Adams. I now live in Pownal and work in Bennington. The one thing that I have noticed with all of this Walmart controversy is that, Bennington has been begging for a Super Walmart and North Adams wants nothing to do with it. Common Sense people. Put it where it is wanted. | | from: Felicia | on: 01-20-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
Doesn't Wal-Mart need a number of variances, including change of use, to be able to build on that site? Has the planning board looked at all possible uses for that land and determined that a super store is without a doubt the best choice? Is there no development that could serve the local population and also be attractive to tourists driving along Route 8 on their way to MoCA from the Mass Pike? What is planned for the old Wal-Mart property once it is vacated?
Editor: Walmart needs five special permits to be approved by the Planning Board, which cannot determine what is best for the site. The property is privately owned. What happens with the old building is up to Walmart. | | from: Maria | on: 01-20-2010 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0) |
|
|
Advertise on iBerkshires.com

|