image description

Mount Greylock Moving Forward with Cost-Share Plan

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Williamstown School Committee member Adams Filson responds to comments at Mount Greylock.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee voted 6-1 to continue discussion on a shared-administrative agreement with School Union 71 but not before making some significant changes.

"I think this has the potential to be a good experiment but I'm not ready to vote on it tonight," said School Committee member Heather Williams, who wanted a final draft of the language first.

The committee spent more than two hours at an unusual Friday night meeting to going over the 13 points to the agreement with input from the district's legal counsel Fred Dupere and Williamstown School Committee members Adam Filson and David Backus, both of whom worked on the feasibility committee with Carrie Greene of Mount Greylock.

The board chopped the number of seats on the proposed administrative review subcommittee in half, from eight to four, and cleaned up and expanded on what they felt was ambiguous language.

The school district and the union, made up of the Williamstown and Lanesborough school districts, began discussing an agreement months ago as a way to share the cost of administrators — superintendent, business director and special education director and, if they so agree, special education and curriculum coordinators and an administrative assistant to the superintendent.

The deal nearly went down in flames two weeks ago when the state said the months of work were for naught because regional districts can't join superintendency unions, only towns. Dupere said after the meeting it was a matter of straightening out wording — the regional district's not joining the union but striking a cost-sharing deal with it.

Committee members, however, expressed concern over whether one board or another would have greater control over the advisory board and the fact that, as originally constituted, both Lanesborough (with two members) and Mount Greylock (with four) would have quorums on the review subcommittee.


School Committee members Heather Williams and Robert Ericsson and counsel Fred Dupere.
Dupere said the review committee was advisory only — the regional district and union would have final say over any actions. To avoid the presence of quorums, the board was cut to four with equal representation — one member each for Lanesborough and Williamstown for the union and one each from the towns for Mount Greylock. A subcommittee quorum would require four members.

The review subcommittee will be responsible for developing the superintendent contract, job descriptions and evaluation procedures; the school committees will be responsible for the evaluations.


The administration sharing is in part driven by the coming retirement of William Travis, superintendent of Mount Greylock (School Union 71, too, was prompted two years ago in part by the retirement of a superintendent). The savings will be minimal but are expected to open up new possibilities for staffing. Both co-Principals Ellen Kaiser and Tim Payne expressed excitement at the potential changes.

"You do yourself a favor by empowering the principals at the building level," said Payne, while Kaiser, who's been pulling double duty as business manager, was eager to get back to work on her real field — curriculum. "I'm ready to step up to the plate."


David Langston was the lone no vote.
David Langston, the single naye vote, strongly believes signing the agreement would jeopardize the school's quality. "We don't have a common budget, we have three different juridical bodies making decisions ... I think this is bringing things together in an institutional way that's not going to work."

He urged a longer time line and a serious look at real structural integration.

"To say that this doesn't work for anybody is simply not true," replied Greene, saying there were towns and school districts that have been using this sharing system for years. "They figure out every single year and every single contract season how to share the staff because they can't afford not to."

The board will take up the revised agreement at its next meeting on May 11.

In other business, the committee:

  • Approved the transfer of $60,000 from the Student Activities Savings Account to the checking account to cover end-of-the-year activities.
  • Accepted the lowest bid of $425,580 from Adams Heating & Plumbing to complete the second phase of the heating system upgrade. Committee member Robert Ericsson, who is acting as project manager, said he would have the bids for the locker room reconstruction and a time line for the project at the May 11 meeting.

The draft agreement discussed Friday night in PDF form.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fitch, Barrett Meet in Debate for State Representative Seat

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The two candidates for the Democratic nomination to represent the First Berkshire District on Beacon Hill found a lot of common ground Thursday on some issues but differed on what is needed to get things done in their only scheduled debate leading up to the Sept. 1 primary election.
 
The incumbent, John Barrett III, and Andrew Fitch, a North Adams city councilor, met in a theater at Williams College's Paresky Center in a forum sponsored by the town's chapter of the League of Women Voters, fielding questions submitted by the public and posed by moderator Jennifer Howlett for just less than an hour.
 
The pair agreed at least in part on issues ranging from same-day voter registration to assisted suicide to the statewide ballot initiative to repeal the legalization of cannabis in the commonwealth.
 
But they parted ways when asked whether they would support efforts to institute a single ballot primary and whether the current Legislature has been responsive enough to respond to a 2024 ballot initiative to have the state auditor audit the House and Senate.
 
Barrett argued that the Legislature already conducts audits and puts the results on the state's website. He further pointed to a lawsuit brought by Auditor Diana DiZoglio over the issue.
 
"She went to court, and the court asked her, are these the four things you wanted [from an audit], and she said yes," Barrett said. "We gave her legislation that gave her the four things she wanted."
 
Calling himself a "big fan of audits," Barrett argued that he participated in them as mayor of North Adams for 26 years. He called efforts to have the state auditor conduct the audit of the Legislature a "Republican thing" and a "sad game."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories