image description

Mount Greylock Moving Forward with Cost-Share Plan

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Williamstown School Committee member Adams Filson responds to comments at Mount Greylock.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee voted 6-1 to continue discussion on a shared-administrative agreement with School Union 71 but not before making some significant changes.

"I think this has the potential to be a good experiment but I'm not ready to vote on it tonight," said School Committee member Heather Williams, who wanted a final draft of the language first.

The committee spent more than two hours at an unusual Friday night meeting to going over the 13 points to the agreement with input from the district's legal counsel Fred Dupere and Williamstown School Committee members Adam Filson and David Backus, both of whom worked on the feasibility committee with Carrie Greene of Mount Greylock.

The board chopped the number of seats on the proposed administrative review subcommittee in half, from eight to four, and cleaned up and expanded on what they felt was ambiguous language.

The school district and the union, made up of the Williamstown and Lanesborough school districts, began discussing an agreement months ago as a way to share the cost of administrators — superintendent, business director and special education director and, if they so agree, special education and curriculum coordinators and an administrative assistant to the superintendent.

The deal nearly went down in flames two weeks ago when the state said the months of work were for naught because regional districts can't join superintendency unions, only towns. Dupere said after the meeting it was a matter of straightening out wording — the regional district's not joining the union but striking a cost-sharing deal with it.

Committee members, however, expressed concern over whether one board or another would have greater control over the advisory board and the fact that, as originally constituted, both Lanesborough (with two members) and Mount Greylock (with four) would have quorums on the review subcommittee.


School Committee members Heather Williams and Robert Ericsson and counsel Fred Dupere.
Dupere said the review committee was advisory only — the regional district and union would have final say over any actions. To avoid the presence of quorums, the board was cut to four with equal representation — one member each for Lanesborough and Williamstown for the union and one each from the towns for Mount Greylock. A subcommittee quorum would require four members.

The review subcommittee will be responsible for developing the superintendent contract, job descriptions and evaluation procedures; the school committees will be responsible for the evaluations.


The administration sharing is in part driven by the coming retirement of William Travis, superintendent of Mount Greylock (School Union 71, too, was prompted two years ago in part by the retirement of a superintendent). The savings will be minimal but are expected to open up new possibilities for staffing. Both co-Principals Ellen Kaiser and Tim Payne expressed excitement at the potential changes.

"You do yourself a favor by empowering the principals at the building level," said Payne, while Kaiser, who's been pulling double duty as business manager, was eager to get back to work on her real field — curriculum. "I'm ready to step up to the plate."


David Langston was the lone no vote.
David Langston, the single naye vote, strongly believes signing the agreement would jeopardize the school's quality. "We don't have a common budget, we have three different juridical bodies making decisions ... I think this is bringing things together in an institutional way that's not going to work."

He urged a longer time line and a serious look at real structural integration.

"To say that this doesn't work for anybody is simply not true," replied Greene, saying there were towns and school districts that have been using this sharing system for years. "They figure out every single year and every single contract season how to share the staff because they can't afford not to."

The board will take up the revised agreement at its next meeting on May 11.

In other business, the committee:

  • Approved the transfer of $60,000 from the Student Activities Savings Account to the checking account to cover end-of-the-year activities.
  • Accepted the lowest bid of $425,580 from Adams Heating & Plumbing to complete the second phase of the heating system upgrade. Committee member Robert Ericsson, who is acting as project manager, said he would have the bids for the locker room reconstruction and a time line for the project at the May 11 meeting.

The draft agreement discussed Friday night in PDF form.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories