image description
The new Youth Center will be designed based on the depictions of option 3.

Williamstown Youth Center Location Chosen

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Youth Center Executive Director David Rempell said that construction is expected to begin in October and last eight to 10 months.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — It's option three.

Months of contentious debate over a new Youth Center to be built on school land boiled down to a two-hour debate and a unanimous decision on Wednesday.

The new Youth Center will be built south of the school and be oriented in a north to south manner along the parking lot as depicted in the third of six options the architects submitted.

"I think option three is the best option loosely defined. I would say the building on that orientation on that drop-off would be my preference at this point," said School Committee member Huff Templeton.

The committee essentially gave the center an amount of land, up to 15,000 square-feet, in the location of option three for the architect, Black River Design, to develop detailed plans on. Those plans need to pass permitting and a final approval from the committee.

"We're really voting on an approximate sight," Adam Filson, committee chairman, said. "This building could move five feet there or ten feet there. The precise location is really going to be dictated by the building code, the zoning code, all of the codes which we don't have jurisdiction over. We're going to let those codes govern the precise location. Once that's done and they're ready to submit that final plan that's when we can also approve again the final location."

Option three stood out, according to committee members, because it was easiest for the school to use for indoor recess because of secure access on the south side of the school, did not cut off views of the playing fields, did not need a new fire lane and caused only minor impact on the playground.

"I asked our board if there was a preference and it gave us a little taste of how difficult this decision is but there was a preference for option three," Youth Center President Paul Jennings said. "While perhaps option four was a better building for the Youth Center in terms of lighting and energy efficiency, there wasn't that much lost with option three. Overall, in terms of how the two buildings can work together and how that option addresses, as best we can, the concerns of the neighbors."

The motion specified that the center needed to be oriented as depicted on the sample design with the two-story-sized gymnasium closer to the school, in the same approximate location and the overall building can not exceed 15,000 square feet of land.

The committee specified the amount of land the building could be on after a lengthy discussion about the measurements. The Youth Center has submitted plans that referred to the building being 12,000 square-feet but Town Manager Peter Fohlin said the dimensions submitted by the architect are closer to 15,000. Youth Center Executive Director David Rempell explained that the approximately 12,000 square-feet refers to usable interior space.

The committee and the center now has a timetable, developed by Fohlin, to adhere to in order to break ground in October – a groundbreaking date four months later than originally proposed. The Youth Center wanted to break ground in June and complete most of the construction while school was not in session but heated debate delayed the project.


"The construction manager said that construction would take about six months but I'm going to estimate more like eight to 10 months," Rempell said. "We initially wanted to break ground in June as soon as school was out but because of rethinking of the plans and the options, that obviously needs to be pushed back."


Elementary School Committee Chairman Adam Filson said the committee just gave approval to move forward and will still need to approve the final plans.
In December, the committee ruled out two options that were developed to attach the center to the school because it would essentially require the school to be divided into two structures to adhere to fire code. In January, the committee ruled out two other options that positioned the center south of the school but in an east-to-west orientation. Those options were ruled out because they would require a new fire lane and would bisect adults' views of the playing field while supervising students.

Option four to position the school in the northeast corner of the campus remained a possibility but it would have required uprooting the drainage system, making it more difficult for the school and the center to share because of secure access to the school. It would also have required a new fire lane.

"It's only been four months since last September when we first presented the site plan. For some of us I suggest it seems like it's been four years," Rempell said. "The options that we sent the school committee came as a result of the public forum and the input we received from the community."

In 2009, the School Committee approved a new center to be built on the property after they reviewed an outline for a two-story building located south of the current school. Last October, Youth Center officials returned to the board with a more specific plan to create a single-floor structure that would nearly double the building's footprint.

The increase in footprint caused heated debate in the community regarding a reduction of green space and invasion of the playing fields. Additionally, the design submitted in October would uproot the playground; the committee formed a 13-member panel to develop options to keep the playground intact. The panel developed three options that centered around repositioning the playing fields.

Concurrently, the center's architect developed six other options that included changes in location and orientation.

The committee then met twice with town officials to discuss permitting restrictions and develop a timetable for decisions.

The proposed 12,000 square-foot building will replace the current center, which is in deplorable condition. The center has raised more than $3 million, including a $100,000 donation from Greylock Federal Credit Union two weeks ago.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Friday Front Porch Feature: A Cozy Place to Be

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Are you looking for a move-in ready home close to the downtown area? Then this just might be the house you're looking for.

Our Friday Front Porch is a weekly feature spotlighting attractive homes for sale in Berkshire County. This week, we are showcasing 193 Cold Spring Road.

This 1950 single-family has four bedrooms and two bathrooms. The house is 2,184 square feet on a little less than an acre of land. The price is $469,900.

The house not only comes with a 3.5-car basement garage but also a detached two-car garage with additional storage space above. The house includes the kitchen appliances like the dishwasher, range, and refrigerator, and has a fireplace, screened porch, and back deck. The home is also generator-ready.

We spoke to Suzette Lyons with Burnham and Gold Real Estate, which has the listing.

What do you think makes this property stand out in the current market?

Lyons: Location, location, location!! This property is a short distance from downtown Spring Street. It's nestled conveniently away from the road and provides substantial privacy. Plus, the home has a well-maintained exterior and interior.

What was your first impression when you walked into the home? 

What a gem! The workmanship is lovely and shows the home has been loved. There is an abundance of space with four bedrooms for family or work/home office space.

The opportunities are endless.

Do you know any unique stories about the home or its history? 

The home was built in the mid-1950s by the owner of Yeadon Farm Dairy on the edge of the farm, now the Thornliebank/Buxton Hill neighborhood, with lumber cut from the property.

Along with thick plaster walls and ceilings on the first floor, quality craftsmanship is abundant throughout.

The house has been owned by the same family who built it and the grandson has made every effort to match the original design and style with all of the renovations, including custom-milled natural woodwork for the private second-floor primary bedroom suite. Family pride in ownership is evident in every space of this well-constructed and maintained house now waiting for a new family to call it "home."

What kind of buyer would this home be ideal for? 

This home appeals to many buyers. There are four bedrooms sufficient for a full-time family, singles or second homeowners. Opportunity for in-law suite. Also, ample room for a home/office business. Lots of storage space with 3 1/2 garages and additional storage space above the oversized two-car garage.

Are there any standout design features? 

Lots of personal touches with natural woodwork throughout, freshly painted light colors to maximize natural light, new flooring in several rooms. Spacious four-season room for relaxing or home/office use. Also, offers a beautiful primary suite on the second floor.

What would you say to a buyer trying to imagine their life in this space? 

A peaceful retreat in the woods. Cozy up to the fireplace on winter nights, enjoy the morning coffee on the back porch or the four-season sunroom. Spend the afternoon gardening in your beautiful yard and connecting with nature. A pet-friendly home offering a fenced yard and durable flooring. A family friendly home directly on the school bus routes.

How would you describe the atmosphere or feel of this home? 

The home has a welcoming feel with natural elements offering a place of comfort and belonging.

You can find out more about this house on its listing here.

*Front Porch Feature brings you an exclusive to some of the houses listed on our real estate page every week. Here we take a bit of a deeper dive into a certain house for sale and ask questions so you don't have to.

 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories