image description

Mount Greylock High Raises Lanesborough's Assessment

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Mount Greylock Regional School District officials revisited Thursday night the previously approved budget to raise Lanesborough's assessment by $4,000.

School Committee member Heather Williams said there was an error in the enrollment numbers the committee used to build the budget and Williamstown actually has one fewer student.

"Williamstown was listed as having 312 students when Williamstown actually has 311 in the October 1st numbers," Williams told the committee. "That shifts the ratio of students slightly and it shifts the town assessments slightly."

The finance subcommittee found the error Tuesday, Williams said. The committee unanimously approved raising Lanesborough's assessment by $4,000.

Also on Thursday, Superintendent of Schools Rose Ellis proposed eliminating the dean of students position and replacing it with an assistant principal. The assistant principal would have an increased role in academics — including doing teacher evaluations — and middle school Principal Ellen Kaiser would take an expanded role as curriculum coordinator. Kaiser currently splits her time as principal and as curriculum coordinator.

"My purpose of doing it is to create a team focus on excellence in Grades 7 through 12," Ellis said. "The job, which would be shared with Tim [Paine], would have components around curriculum and instruction."

Ellis said the move should not affect the budget because the salary allocated for the current dean of students would be shifted to the new assistant principal. The school has currently budgeted $48,897 for the position.

"I'm confident that we can cover it," Ellis said.

The need for a dean is diminishing because the school hired a full-time psychologist and began a student support center, she said. Ellis also cited shrinking enrollment numbers but Williams countered that by saying enrollment is expected to stay fairly even through 2014.

"That position is focused on discipline and I know it may have been effective," Ellis said. "But I feel going forward that we need to build more leadership capacity in our building."

While Ellis was hoping to get the committee's approval Thursday, board members said they felt uncomfortable voting on it after hearing of it for the first time.

"I am reluctant to vote on it tonight because I would like to have some more thought about it and also talk to the community," David Langston, committee member, said. "I would like a report from the finance committee about the actual impact on the budget."

The committee set another meeting in two weeks to vote on the change.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories