image description
Shamus Heffernan is helping the Affordable Housing Committee as a local, volunteer liaison for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Here he shows locations where the committee could develop more housing.

Proprietors Fields Plans Expansion in Williamstown

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Local housing groups are planning a 20 -25 unit expansion of Proprietors Fields.

The Berkshire Housing Development Corp. and the current 60-unit complex's owners, the Williamstown Elderly Housing Corp., have begun planning the expansion in the wake of about 200 homes in the Spruces Mobile Home Park being destroyed by Hurricane Irene.

The groups are hoping to file an application for government funding to construct the additional housing by the beginning of the year. The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development and the state Department of Housing and Community Development as well as local sources are being eyed for possible funding sources.

Council on Aging Director Brian O'Grady and Affordable Housing Committee Chairman Catherine Yamamoto announced the planned development at a committee meeting on Wednesday night while town officials were discussing using the site for development. The Affordable Housing Committee is planning on doing a feasibility study on multiple properties in town to determine its development viability.

Committee members each have been taking looks at possible housing developments for each meeting as it prepared to ask the Community Preservation Act Committee for money to perform the study on the top three plots of land. On Wednesday, the group was intrigued by the possibility of adding four additional units to the Spring Meadow development on North Hoosac Road.

Committee member Cheryl Shanks said she had spoken with the owner, David Carver, about a possible addition. Carver can use the same blueprints and a development should only take about six months. The 6.8-acre plot is appealing because it is close to public transportation, has on-site utilities and the correct zoning. However, the committee did not like that only four units would be developed.

The group also looked at the Burbank property, off Luce Road, and the Lowry property, off Stratton Road. The town owns both properties but those were set aside for conservation and therefore requires a lengthy process to become usable.

The Burbank property is the largest at 140 acres and there is access and nearby utilities, Shanks said.


"It's a big open space and a lot of it is dry," Shanks said. "There is a lot of road access."

While much of the land is swampland, there is buildable land, she said.

The Lowry property showed promise because a lot of the work had already been completed. A 2002 feasibility assessment had been done for the purpose of building housing. While that property does have buildable lots, committee members were nervous about why the previous development failed as well as trying to get the land back from the Conservation Commission.

Those ideas are added to previously looked at locations — including reusing the Spruce park — and the members each took additional properties to examine before it craft its proposal.

"We want to look at everything and evaluate it on its own merits," Yamamoto said. "The approach and the solution is not one project, not one focus."

The group is hoping for multiple development projects in different parts of the town.

Tags: affordable housing,   Spruces,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories